mrs.anteater's picture

mrs.anteater

image

Church commune

Our earth and we are in trouble. Ecologically, we are consuming too much energy and water per capita in the Western world,

Socially, we are developing to more and more single parents or single seniors who are financially disadvantaged and often struggle to make ends meet.

At the same time, we are called to be the Church, a community of people who care for eachother. 

Before I got married, I explored several christian communes as an alternative lifestyle, but then ended up in the good small old family structure. However, the idea never left me.

Here in rural NS, people only seem to live together if they can't afford to live on their own, taking boarders in or live as a multi generational family clan. Or you buy some property in a seniors co-op and isolate yourself among peers.

What happened to the idea of the communes of the sixties and seventies, when people lived together who shared an idea/ lifestyle? Is it not time to start this all over again for the sake of our planet as well as as a social or religious model?

Are there any examples on the west coast?

Share this

Comments

joejack2's picture

joejack2

image

I lived in a 'modified'

I lived in a 'modified' commune setting in Toronto for two years in the 1970's during graduate school.  The same dysfunctional problems arose in that setting as you'd witness in a 'nuclear family'.  There were those who did more than their share of the work, etc. and those who went along for the ride.  The more people you introduce into a situation, the more complex the structure becomes.  In this situation, everyone had his/her own private space, locked doors, privacy, etc. but the group dynamics became unwieldy.  You still have a pecking order in which one or two people consider themselves 'the leaders' and the rest are expected to go along.  They ended up with several 'nuclei' of groups that often would conflict with others.  A few attempted communal settings fell apart because of power struggles, etc.  Yes, human beings are aggressive and self-centred: including you and me.  Conflicts went unresolved, and the resultant crisis situations were destructive.  I prefer to keep it simple anymore.  I no longer own a car (I can drive no longer anyway), I recycle, and I can direct my environmental impact better than in the communal setting.  I used to rent a facility that even had a composting toilet.  Boy, was I environmental and green, eh?  I'd recommend keep it small and keep it simple.

mrs.anteater's picture

mrs.anteater

image

Thanks JoeJ, I just read the

Thanks JoeJ,

I just read the book: " I am a Hutterite"- which gavea very interesting look into those religious communities- and yes, the same struggles which in the case of the writer's story even lead to the death of a child because the leader didn't allow the parent to take the car to go to the hospital in time. Still, is there no hope?

Tabitha's picture

Tabitha

image

Hey I read that book this

Hey I read that book this summer to. Found it fascinating as I have consulted to schools on H colonies-and enjoyed meals with the colonies.

Rev. Steven Davis's picture

Rev. Steven Davis

image

 The idea of the religious

 The idea of the religious commune is very similar to the Book of Acts description of an early Christian community: Acts 4:32-37. We would likely define this today as a socialist society: all possessions held in common, etc. As a model Christian community, it obviously didn't last long. By the time of Paul, he was clearly writing to Christian communities that were not communal. With the exception, I suppose, of monasteries (which I don't think we're exactly speaking about) the model has come and gone and never lasted in any significant way for very long. The model is also easily abused. Jonestown was a type of commune, after all. The very fact that such communes don't seem to be able to sustain themselves long-term may point to a structural difficulty in the model, which might well stem from the disillusionment described by joejack2 when the people in the commune discover that, after all, the grass ain't greener.

Tabitha's picture

Tabitha

image

I wonder if Aaron-admin2 has

I wonder if Aaron-admin2 has anything to add.

He was part of Sojourners. At one time it had a residental component. Christian commune? Sort of.

Could someone flag this post as offensive so Aaron sees it?

Thanks

Witch's picture

Witch

image

Sorry Tabitha but could I ask

Sorry Tabitha but could I ask you to clarify please?

 

Is there something you find offensive? Or are you simply suggesting using the reporting mechanism to get Admin's attention drawn to a thread he might find ionteresting or could comment on?

 

I certainly wouldn't find anything wrong with the latter.

MistsOfSpring's picture

MistsOfSpring

image

Communal societies work

Communal societies work better when the people involved literally need each other to survive.  People are less willing to share and cooperate and bend their will when they don't have to.  I've thought a lot about communal living recently because I think that that's more in line with how humans are "meant to" live biologically, but having been raised in the western world, I'm not sure that I could give up my independence and autonomy for the benefits provided in terms of community support and environmental responsibility.

 

I've tried to envision a communal style of living that could work these days and the best I can come up with is townhouses surrounding a huge shared yard with gardens (and likely greenhouse in this climate) and a large common building for shared meals, laundry facilities and socializing.  People would still be free to have their own private homes and raise their children in their own way, but each family would contribute to the common good by using their own skills: some would volunteer in a shared child care facility, some would take care of the lawns and gardens, some would do maintenance on the buildings, some would tend to the sick, etc.  People would have their own jobs and lives outside of the commune and all activities wouldn't have to be shared...perhaps just one meal a day in the communal dining hall that everyone comes together for, and people do their own breakfast and lunch at home, for example. 

 

It would be a great way to save money and develop a healthy sense of community.  Yes, there would be some who do more than others.  That's inevitable.  If the people who came together genuinely cared for each other AND believed in the idea, I think it would have a better chance of working.  I'm still not sure that I could do it personally, but this is the kind of model I could see working best for me.

mrs.anteater's picture

mrs.anteater

image

Thanks Mist, I thought that

Thanks Mist,

I thought that way, too. I would add that solar panels, heat pump heating could become more affordable for the single group. I also think that it needs a common purpose and include the disadvantaged. Seniors or accessible housing, neigbourly help as driving to appointments and picking up groceries, looking after kids. Not everybody would have to do everything.

Like you, I don't know if I would be able to live like that.

But then again, isn't that what we are called to? Did Jesus say: Love eachother, but keep a distance? When I was in my twenties, I volunteered at the Catholic Workers for a couple of months. I found life was easier, when all you had would fit into a backpack.

 

Tabitha's picture

Tabitha

image

Hi Witch. I was asking to be

Hi Witch.

I was asking to be flagged just to get Aaron's attention. No i have the utmost respect for Sojourners- no concerns aboout offense at all.

You just can't flag your own post.

Hey wait a minute-I can do a wondermail. I'll try that.

Nope-I got  2 messages-one said private message sent-other one said" admin2 cannot receive private maessages"

crazyheart's picture

crazyheart

image

Send to aaron

Send to aaron

carolla's picture

carolla

image

hi mrs. anteater ... you

hi mrs. anteater ... you might be interested in looking at the Catholic Workers Movement ... they do operate a number of homes in Canada - not perhaps your theology, but an example of living cooperatively - http://www.catholicworker.org/communities/commlistall.cfm

 

There are a number of houses here in the Toronto area, which do reportedly include LGBT folks - it would be interesting to see how that jives with Roman Catholic beliefs. 

carolla's picture

carolla

image

Perhaps the other example

Perhaps the other example that comes to my mind is L'Arche communities ... they are quite remarkable, but likely a little different in their focus than you were meaning.

mrs.anteater's picture

mrs.anteater

image

Carolla, I stayed at the

Carolla,

I stayed at the Catholic Workers in New York City for 6 months back in 1989- I guess that's where the idea came from. Actually, that's where my love of North American people started, because I met just amazing people there. Probably ended up in Canada partially because of that, LOL.

I knew they had some houses in Canada, but didn't know where. Thanks for the link. It's been a long time. Quiet a few workers back then were LG-I guess that's when I completly lost any prejudice I might have had until then, because they had such great personalities and were so loving. We ran a homeless shelter and a soup kitchen, visited people dying of aids in the hospital, distributed blankets and hot beverages on the streets...

Jadespring's picture

Jadespring

image

   A few years back when

 

 A few years back when looking for a place to buy and live I did look into the idea of what can loosely be called intentional communities.  In this case with an eco somewhat back to the land bent.    There's a few around and more being created every year.  They did and still do have some appeal personally.  I don't have any interest in a commune style living arrangement because I know about the success rates and the negatives.  Just not my style.  

 

What I looked into were ones that were mostly based on private housing and mostly private lifestyle arrangements with the sharing part being some communal gardens and some communal animal husbandry arrangements. Also shared are basic infrastructure resources.  So for instance you would own your house and a bit of land but there would be shared fields and shared pasture.   I find this type of arrangement appealing because basically it mimics the 'family farm' type lifestyle while taking into consideration modern conditions and necessity.     For instance it's very difficult to support yourself with just farm income and a good many single families that do farm have some sort of off farm income now because it's necessary for survival.   Basically what this means is you have two jobs and a crap load of work.   I don't mind hard work but working 18 hours a day kinda takes away from some of the benefits of such a lifestyle.   When some of this sort of work is shared for mutual benefit of those sharing it helps.     Having animals pretty much ties you down and with animals forget about taking any days off.   Animals don't have weekends . :)     

 

  Do you want to take a holiday? Even just a long weekend?  Ha, forget about it, unless you have a nice neighbor who is capable of helping with the daily care.   This is especially a necessity if you have any animals that need to be milked.  While it is possible now to work out mutual care arrangements with a traditional neighbor arrangement, you do my place and I'll do yours it is a pain.  The being tied down factor is one of the main reasons that right now I only have chickens.  Would love to get a couple of milk goats, a few sheep and possibly a couple of pigs or cows to raise for meat.   Haven't taken the plunge though because once they're on site there is a big trade off in terms of restrictions vs benefit.     Living in a semi-communal arrangement with a bunch of people where the neighbor help arrangement is built in is appealing for this factor alone.    Heck it would be wonderful to have at least one day a week to take off from daily chicken chores.  :)    

 

 Then there is also the other types of help factors.  The communal barn raising is an example.   Help me build mine and help me build yours, even if it's just a garden shed.  Doable by one person but more quick and more fun with more people.   Of course with a good group of neighbors and friends this type of thing can still happen, especially if you provide beer and burgers but in a situation where people have chosen the same general lifestyle it's a lot easier to arrange.   

Rowan's picture

Rowan

image

For anyone interested in

For anyone interested in 'simple living' you might want to have a look at this webite.  These folks don't live communally exactly, but they way they live and run their farm is rather interesting

 

http://pgburrell.home.mindspring.com/

carolla's picture

carolla

image

oh mrs. anteater - that's so

oh mrs. anteater - that's so interesting that you actually lived in a Catholic Workers Movement house ... I learned about them recently when actually trying to search out some supportive housing options for a client of mine ... sounded very interesting for sure.  Nice to hear it was such a positive experience for you. 

lastpointe's picture

lastpointe

image

 Some communities live as Co

 Some communities live as Co ops.  My sister in law lived for years in a co op townhouse community.  Each person rented their own home but there was a board that oversaw the community.

Committees that looked after, among other things, renovations and upkeep.  A certain amount of money was paid into this pot.  I can't now remember ihow much of the rent was diverted this way.

 

This money would do things like replace windows, new fridges, new furnaces, new playgrounds.  Everyone was expected to participate in order to live there on some committee or other.

 

But like all large groups, some homes really participated and some did not.  Issues arose one year when all the fridges were getting old and a decision was made to start replacing them.  The squabbles over who first was long and loud as i recall.

 

On the other hand, they kept rent low and the idea that the community would replace things that normally an owner would was good.  Of course at the end it was only rental housing so no one built up any equity.  A any landlord would have had to replace things anyway.  In this situation they just had more control over how to do it.

retiredrev's picture

retiredrev

image

My late father-in-law did

My late father-in-law did business with a Hutterite community near his place in Manitoba.  I visited there with him.  Alcoholism among the men was high. They used electricity in their barns, so the men stayed out in the barn and 'worked'.  I must admit their pig barns were odourless with the latest in air exchange technology.  They were allowed to use 'modern' devices in the barn.  The women were relegated to 'women's work' and having babies by the dozens.  One young man left the colony and, when he tried to return, had to crawl on his hands and knees in front of the entire community to the pastor's house every day for a week and beg for forgiveness.  I found that more than a little excessive and quite abusive.  Inbreeding among the population was a problem.  I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that the rumour of 'hiring' young college students for 'stud' purposes were just that; a rumour.  In any communal community, the possibility of abuse always exists and some people are more equal than others. 

mrs.anteater's picture

mrs.anteater

image

lastpointe, We had a co-op

lastpointe,

We had a co-op community idea starting here as well, it also included being partially property, but they wanted it exclusively for seniors. I am not sure if it finally succeeded, because when I heard about it, they had already tried for several years to get it started. I didn't find it appealing to choose to live with all old people- who is going to help eachother out when the majority needs help to be able to stay in their home?

Where would be the young people to keep the old one's mind open for change?

It was also planned in the local university town, the most expensive place to live around here- so it was exclusive in many ways.

 

 

Hilary's picture

Hilary

image

My sister lives with her kids

My sister lives with her kids in a government subsidized co-op because she is currently on a fixed income.  She loves that there are always neighbours watching over the kidlets when they're playing outside, that she knows everyone who lives in the area, and that she has some responsibility on the gardening committee.  She never has to wait long when her fridge (or something else) needs repairs, because the man next door to her is on the maintenance committee.  That kind of communal living is perfect for her family; I'm so glad it exists.

Back to Church Life topics