
Introduced by the Revd. Cheri DiNovo (NDP - Parkdale-High Park), this private member's bill would amend the Ontario Human Rights Code to protect Ontarians from discrimination on the basis of gender identity.
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada
Comments
Kinst
Cheri's a United Church
Posted on: 11/29/2009 16:35
Cheri's a United Church Reverend and an NDP MPP.
Bill 224 was reintroduced on Nov 19, 2009.
Facebook group!
http://www.xtra.ca/public/National/Ontario_MPP_reintroduces_gender_ident...
What do you think? You don't have to be from Ontario.
sighsnootles
go cheri... wow. i didn't
Posted on: 12/01/2009 08:32
go cheri... wow. i didn't know that this was even an issue here until now.
thanks for posting this, kinst!!
InannaWhimsey
We do live in the future,
Posted on: 12/01/2009 13:33
We do live in the future, where the miraculous is commonplace, and the strange is normal.
I like it here.
Next up: Different-Spirited people, Transpecies Operations, and Right-to-Murder (when Resurrection Technology becomes perfected, of coise).
Just a Self-writing poem,
Inannawhimsey
SG
Cheri DiNovo has been one of
Posted on: 12/01/2009 09:54
Cheri DiNovo has been one of the LGBTQ communities allies, from the pulpit and the floor of provincial Parliament.
sighsnootles
InannaWhimsey wrote: Next
Posted on: 12/01/2009 15:50
Next up: Different-Spirited people, Transpecies Operations, and Right-to-Murder (when Resurrection Technology becomes perfected, of coise).
what do you mean by this, inanna??
InannaWhimsey
sigsnootles, rights for
Posted on: 12/01/2009 19:52
sigsnootles,
rights for TG folk became possible when the technology to achieve transgender surgery became cost-effective.
Now, just imagine a world where our technology has advanced to the point where we don't have to worry aboot dying, we heal from most injuries pretty fast. We have extended our lifespans to the point where death has become pretty much consensual. Thanks to genetic modification technologies and extensions of current stem cell research, we now can grow new bodies for ourselves and download our 'selves' into them. We can tweak our genome and cells so that we can grow a tail, or wings, or even add another species to us, so we can have Polar Bear/Human hybrids etc etc ('transpecies operations'). I can see there being people in this world who will want to participate in Murder, consensually, since death won't be permanent (unless wanted). Or people building bodies or somehow age-regressing themselves and being polymorphously perverse.
I think that this world is going to happen, eventually, and that what is immoral today won't be tomorrow, as always seems to happen.
Of course, we will have people who won't want to be modified. The 'Nats' lets call them. And people who will want to become 'Machine Spirits' or whichever...
The Rights of Tomorrow will be mind-blowing. I can't wait :3
Just a Self-writing poem,
Inannawhimsey
Kinst
What have you been reading
Posted on: 12/01/2009 20:14
What have you been reading lately InannaWhimsey?
Sounds like someone's a sci fi person.
InannaWhimsey
Kinst, I have an omnivorous
Posted on: 12/01/2009 22:28
Kinst,
I have an omnivorous mind.
SF is so today. Today, we have artifical cells (both made from scratch & made from cell-material). We have manufactured DNA with the creator's signature on it. We have Spider Goats. We have cloning technology. We have the # of poor falling for the first time since humans began. We have designed switches that can turn off if someone is observing them. We have the ability to turn skin cells into spermatazoa and ova. We are learning how to make computers that will utilize superposition and entanglement. If the Gulf War hadn't had intervened, a sizeable percentage of the poor populations in the world would have "free electricity" right now.
And much more. Miracles are happening all the time and it is just gonna accelerate. Blink, and I find that the world has changed again :3
(since I'm in school, I have been reading school work. not much time for reading conscious fiction)
Just a Self-writing poem,
Inannawhimsey
chansen
Apparently, fallacious
Posted on: 12/01/2009 21:15
Apparently, fallacious "slippery slope" arguments write themselves as well.
MC jae
Kinst wrote:What do you
Posted on: 12/01/2009 22:27
Hm, Kinst, I really don't know. What exactly is "gender identity?"
What does the APA say about this?
InannaWhimsey
chansen wrote: Apparently,
Posted on: 12/01/2009 22:31
Apparently, fallacious "slippery slope" arguments write themselves as well.
Now it's my turn to be bemused.
What do you mean by this, m'dear? I think most here, so far, are on board for the OP :3 There are no demons or monsters here, just people who are excited at how we as a species are growing.
Just a Self-writing poem,
Inannawhimsey
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: Growth doesn't
Posted on: 12/03/2009 07:18
Growth doesn't mean inverting your penis.
sorry, what do you mean by that??
Marzo
Beshpin wrote: Growth doesn't
Posted on: 12/03/2009 07:21
Growth doesn't mean inverting your penis.
What kind of craziness is Beshpin spouting now?
MC jae
Beshpin wrote:That growth as
Posted on: 12/03/2009 23:54
If I understand the issue correctly, Beshpin, and I'm not claiming at all that I do, some people who have penises (penii?) don't need to have their genitals inverted to become women. They believe that they already are women.
Well then don't have one.
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: That growth as
Posted on: 12/04/2009 06:59
That growth as a society doesn't mean people should be inverting their penis to become a woman.
If we're going to talk about this, then what makes a man or a woman? Thought? How they feel? Those are as ludicrous as socially ascribed gender roles.
I have been and will always be strongly against trans-gender operations.
well then, as a conservative, you should just NOT HAVE ONE and leave the rest of us to our own business, correct??
Free_thinker
"will always be strongly
Posted on: 12/04/2009 15:37
"will always be strongly against trans-gender operations."
You're 18-29. How can you rule this out so categorically? What if your child was transgendered?
chansen
Free_thinker wrote: "will
Posted on: 12/04/2009 16:04
"will always be strongly against trans-gender operations."
You're 18-29. How can you rule this out so categorically? What if your child was transgendered?
There's always conversion therapy, which is about as scarring as being waterboarded, and about as effective.
Mendalla
Given some of the stories of
Posted on: 12/05/2009 16:50
Given some of the stories of discrimination and outright abuse I've heard from the TG pack on my other board, this is welcome news. Too bad only one of them (who currently lives in Ottawa) will benefit if it passes, since most of them are Americans. IOW, she has my total, 100% support and if I was in her riding, I might well switch my vote back to the NDP over this.
Unfortunately, it's a private members bill that will likely be vociferously opposed by some, possibly even in her own caucus. In other words this is going to be an uphill battle. So, if you are in favour of this bill, write to your MPP, folks. The more support they hear, the more likely it is that this will get the votes it needs.
Mendalla
Mendalla
Beshpin wrote: That growth as
Posted on: 12/05/2009 16:56
That growth as a society doesn't mean people should be inverting their penis to become a woman.
If we're going to talk about this, then what makes a man or a woman? Thought? How they feel? Those are as ludicrous as socially ascribed gender roles.
I have been and will always be strongly against trans-gender operations.
I don't care if you like what they are or not. For them, it's not a matter of choosing their sex; it's a matter of correcting a problem (having a male body when they are female in nature or vice versa) and they deserve better than this kind of scorn. Bottom line is that are HUMAN beings and should have HUMAN rights, regardless of whether you like what operations they've had or not.
Mendalla
InannaWhimsey
Beshpin, I don't see the OP
Posted on: 12/05/2009 22:07
Beshpin,
I don't see the OP as being aboot SRS (Sexual Reassignment Surgery), but, rather, aboot discriminating against someone based on Gender Identity. Discrimination should be based on ability :3
In related news, if the people that qualify for SRS do have something 'wrong' with them, then we should be able to change that, somehow. Ways should be figured out to change that. Medicines, etc. Right now, I view SRS as quite a crude way of doing it (did you know that not all Transexuals go through SRS? Hormone treatments are much more common) but, with time, we'll get better at it, until I imagine a treatment that will be as easy as changing your clothing or taking a pill.
Beshpin, aren't you just going to love the world that is coming, where everyone gets the the world they want...won't that be an uncertain world? :3
Just a Self-writing poem,
Inannawhimsey
Marzo
InannaWhimsey
Posted on: 12/06/2009 08:05
Beshpin,
I don't see the OP as being aboot SRS (Sexual Reassignment Surgery), but, rather, aboot discriminating against someone based on Gender Identity. Discrimination should be based on ability :3
In related news, if the people that qualify for SRS do have something 'wrong' with them, then we should be able to change that, somehow. Ways should be figured out to change that. Medicines, etc. Right now, I view SRS as quite a crude way of doing it (did you know that not all Transexuals go through SRS? Hormone treatments are much more common) but, with time, we'll get better at it, until I imagine a treatment that will be as easy as changing your clothing or taking a pill.
Beshpin, aren't you just going to love the world that is coming, where everyone gets the the world they want...won't that be an uncertain world? :3
Just a Self-writing poem,
Inannawhimsey
This seems completely unreal to me and I don't see what it has to do with transexuality and sex-change treatments.
I am not opposed to sex changes although I'm inclined to feel that it is a positive thing for a person to accept his or herself as androgynous, a feminine man or a masculine woman without going through the hormone changes and surgery.
If sex change treatments make a person happier then I stand corrected.
How does everyone get the world they want?
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: My child
Posted on: 12/06/2009 16:16
My child will not be trans-gendered, as I will raise them to be who they are, not who they want to be. I will teach my children to be happy and confident with themselves, not assuming that they are somehow broken.
ROTFLMAO!!
man, i just about spit my coffee across the computer screen when i read that!!
do you honestly think that YOU are going to change the face of parenting children in our world today!??!? like NOBODY ELSE in this whole entire world is even close to being as competent a parent as you are going to be someday!?!?
ROTFLMAO!!
If anyone thinks they were built wrong, they should commit suicide, because an operation isn't going to change how they were built, only how they are mutilated.
only if you are a depressed psychopath.
if you are in your right mind, you can look at gender reassignment as a possible answer.
TG operations are just a small step removed from eugenics and gene manipulation.
WHOOOP!!!!
holy crap, dude, you are in rare form today!!!
i think you need to have a few beers or something.
MC jae
Beshpin wrote:My child will
Posted on: 12/06/2009 16:37
Your children will be who they are, no matter what your intentions may be.
They will be wonderfully created in the God-image. Transgendered or not, they will be in the God-creation-spectrum, which is a diversity-rainbow. If they are transgendered, that is not a choice they will consciously make.
sighsnootles
umm, yeah. thats what i
Posted on: 12/06/2009 16:47
umm, yeah.
thats what i MEANT to say. it just came out as 'ROTFLMAO!!'
well put, aquila.
InannaWhimsey
Marzo wrote: What do you mean
Posted on: 12/06/2009 17:55
What do you mean when you say "everyone gets the world they want"?
Perhaps this could be a Forum Topic or Blog that I could write in the future? Thank you for the inspiration :3
(how it relates to the OP is that I see, as time goes on, people's personal Rights being made into 'Law', and how exciting that is. as time goes on, ``morality`` becomes more fine-tuned)
Nobody will get the world they want, all this crap is just some of the benefits we get from living in a society of so much surplus. Our culture is bullshit and frankly once we start having real problems to deal with again, things will be very different.
I wouldn't confuse your current life state and your feelings in regarding it with the 'state of the world' or 'the state of your society'. I find that to be unscientific thinking.
I think all you can really state is that, to you, at this time, such-and-such seems to be the way it is.
You have much more power and choice over what you are writing and thinking than you may think. Who knows, maybe writing the way you do gives you kicks? But either way, you create your 'world'. You are rich beyond measure.
Which is also a choice. Wether you think of the world as good or bad or bad and good is your choice. To say otherwise is to give up your own responsibility for your views and beliefs.
I am not saying that, say, when you get into a car accident, you can will your injuries to heal instantly or for the accident to never have happened. But that after it happens, you have a lot of control over the MEANING of the event. And we've found out that doing that can even lead to objective states.
It's easy to say that the world is falling apart, or that society deserves to fail, or that we're raping existence...there are people and organizations and ways-of-thinking that encourage this. It is trendy. What is hard is trying to break free of that.
You always have a choice, even if it seems like you don't.
Just a Self-writing poem,
Inannawhimsey
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: Actually, you
Posted on: 12/06/2009 19:24
Actually, you can mold a child very effectively, I would call into question the parenting of any person who is interested in being transgendered.
LOL!!
oh you can, can you??!?!
ROTFLMAO!!
so, how many kids have you raised, besh???
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: Hang on a
Posted on: 12/06/2009 19:52
Hang on a second, did you actually just say that you think being TG is not a choice? Is it WRITTEN INTO YOUR GENES? Are you honestly trying to tell me right now that gender role is written into genes?
Do I need to explain behavioural genetics to more people? Genes are not the be all and end all when it comes to behaviour. Behaviour is a culmination of both environment and maturation.
LOL!!
how many kids have you raised again??
MC jae
Beshpin, it seems to me that
Posted on: 12/06/2009 23:24
Beshpin, it seems to me that you are sideswiping an important question here.
What would you do if your child announced to you that they were transgendered?
Please don't just answer something along the lines of "Oh, that would never happen because I of how I would have raised them."
SG
Beshpin, You are entitled
Posted on: 12/07/2009 01:02
Beshpin,
You are entitled to your opinion. I am also entitled to tell you as a TG person that you really are making me sick, no matter what it is you are TRYING to say.
You said, "That growth as a society doesn't mean people should be inverting their penis to become a woman."
I would in some ways agree. As a TG person, in this society, we classify people as male OR female. I fit neither. I fit both. I went to my wife's Christmas party in a suit and tie. It is who I am and what I wanted to wear. If I had a moustache or was clean shaven with 5 o'clock shadow or went into the men's room it would cause no stares or not even be noticed. I know people who have started hormones so life is easier. Not because a hairy chest or a moustache or breasts make a person, but because society says they do. Boys have _ and _ and __, Girls have __ and __ and ___. I feel for those people who do things, not because of their wants/needs, but because of societies BS.
You said "If we're going to talk about this, then what makes a man or a woman? Thought? How they feel? Those are as ludicrous as socially ascribed gender roles."
I would agree that what makes a man or a woman is not about genitals or the way a mind thinks or emotions or who does what around the house.
You said "I have been and will always be strongly against trans-gender operations."
I would ask "Why?" If it is not your body, what makes it "wrong"? Is tattooing wrong? Ear piercing? Breast augmentation or reduction? What change of the body is it that touches on your gross or wrong button?
As a trans gender person, any operation I have is a trans-gender operation. Oh did you simply mean gender reassignment? Do you equally get out of joint about a woman who chooses masectomy over risk of breast cancer or a tumour? Do you crap over breast reconstruction? Are women determined by breasts? I would say no. Do you get out of joint about men choosing orchidectomy over prostate risk or cancer? Do you blow a gasket about penile reconstruction? Are men determined by testes or penis? I would say no. So, if it is not the fashioning of boobs, vagina, penis... if it is not body modification... it is something deeper. What is it?
Patient and doctor discussing options, risks, success and failure... make decision that are THEIRS. Personally, I saw no point in skin grafts and risk to create something not as well constructed as a prosthesis. I was well informed by my medical team and it was MY decision. I could make it because there was no person in my life railing for sugery and no people railing against it.
You said, "My child will not be trans-gendered, as I will raise them to be who they are, not who they want to be. I will teach my children to be happy and confident with themselves, not assuming that they are somehow broken."
I will pray to God that they are not TG. It is hopeful that you seem to dance around society and gender roles and the like, but they would meet disapproval and be hurt, angry... feel judged... by your words the same way as I currently do.
You said" If anyone thinks they were built wrong, they should commit suicide, because an operation isn't going to change how they were built, only how they are mutilated."
This is where you made my stomach churn. The suicide comment, which appears to have been removed. Can you aplogize for a statement made it haste or in anger or spur of the moment or without thinking.... Or are you content, as it appears, to leave it stand?
Because my mentally ill mother, no matter how hard it was for her, never would have suggested I go kill myself. Yet, there is a bit in what you say here that aligns with those who work with transgender folks. If you have problems, work them out. A new physique won't change them. You are the same person inside before and after surgery. It simply aligns your body with your self-image.
That you say some sickening thing about ANYONE committing suicide and THEN you go on to say this: "I would call into question the parenting of any person who is interested in being transgendered." ??? Somehow, to you, is a parent that says "go kill yourself" somehow superior to a transgender parent? Hmmm...
You said, "feeling that you're the wrong gender sounds to me like a case of dissociative behaviour."
It can sound to you like anything. You are not a trained medical or mental health professional and it shows. You also have no little to no grasp of transgenderism/transexualism. One has to be examined by mental health professionals. It used to be determined that people had gender identity disorder but the professionals have largely realized that transgender people do not all have confusion or emotional distress. Soon the APA will no longer place any diagnosis on transgender folks. The medical and psychiatric community are beginning to understand cross-living or "third sex".
A disassociation between genitals and societal gender roles means many who are NOT transgender would be disassociative.
Some feel they must align the appearance of their body. Some can function with gender roles and identities and some forge one for themselves. It is whether you can function with the way society is and within gender roles.
Exploring the possibility of being transexual is pretty standard for almost all TG people. Yes, so you are advocating suicide or contemplation of it.....
Gender dysphoric does not mean sex reassignment. I live fully in the opposite sex gender role without surgery. I do not have complete revulsion at my genitals. I also sympathize with those who cannot function in our society and dual gender roles and those who are repulsed by their genitals.
It is also ruled out, by trained professionals, that there is body dysmorphic disorder (delusions about body changes), malingering (professed mental distress for benefit), borderline personality, disassociative identity disorder (split personality). Other things, even things like OCD, are looked for that may play a role in whether one will get a green light for gender reassignment.
Maybe you need a peek at transexual protocol and resources for transgender care so you can make at least an informed objection.
SG
Now, back to the real issue,
Posted on: 12/07/2009 01:14
Now, back to the real issue, not people's ick factor....
As a TG person, I can be told under current law that the dress code is business professional and business professional for people biologically female is a dress and pantyhose. I would feel like I was in drag. I would have/do have no recourse. It means that TG folk often work, regardless of ability, in work that requires no professional business attire. They are often underemployed.
I would look like Ernest Borgnine in drag. I would feel, in my soul, worse than that. My last dress was a forced wearing in my early teens and I cried until I vomited over it. I would rather beg on the streets than work in a dress.
I can be fired for "dressing inappropriately" not being unkempt or slovenly or wearing anything different than is seen around the office, nothing provocative, but deemed inappropriate for my gender. I can be refused housing. I can be denied care by a doctor.
I will not say I am sorry for believing I deserve human rights and treated equally.
If a person can do the job without a dress then so too can I. Damn it!
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: 0, does that
Posted on: 12/07/2009 09:29
0, does that mean that I don't know the difference between observational, classical and operant conditioning?
if you truly believe that a child who is transgendered wasn't born that way, but rather conditioned to be that way by their parents, then YES. you have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you understand what aversion therapy is? How about behaviour modification techniques?
yes.
i have a bachelors degree in nursing, specializing in pediatric nursing, psychiatry, and family centered care. i also have a professional certifcate in foster care, with a strong component of behaviour modification techniques. finally, i currently co-facilitate courses for other foster parents in areas of family centred foster care, as well as training biological families proven techniques in discipline.
i know exactly what aversion therapy is, as well as the latest behaviour modification techniques.
on top of that, i am in the process of raising three biological children, and have done extended care for 13 foster children, working very closely with biological parents to help them learn to care for their children upon their return to the home.
this is why i can tell you, quite competently, that you are talking out of your ass if you seriously believe that a child who is transgendered was 'made that way' by 'questionable parenting'.
These are all tools that have been misused in the development of a child that feels they are not in the right body.
again, the fact that you make a statement like that shows that you have NO IDEA what you are talking about when you discuss concepts like aversion therapy or behaviour modification techniques. in fact, you sound like someone who has watched 'a clockwork orange' and now feels they can be a psychiatrist.
I mean, no offense, but feeling that you're the wrong gender sounds to me like a case of dissociative behaviour.
on what professional grounds do you make that claim, besh?? do you understand what dissociative behaviour is??
While this can vary in degree from mild to severe, at the point where you're changing your genitals to align with an idea of what you think you are I would probably deem it severe.
considering that people who get gender reassignment surgery only do so after years of mental therapy, i wonder on what grounds you make a claim like this... because with this statement, you are basically calling into question the competence of psychiatrists with years and years of education and experience.
how many years of psychiatry training and experience have you had, besh??
ninjafaery
Beshpin's going to raise his
Posted on: 12/07/2009 14:29
Beshpin's going to raise his kid in a Skinner Box, doncha know.
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: sighsnootles
Posted on: 12/07/2009 17:12
if you truly believe that a child who is transgendered wasn't born that way, but rather conditioned to be that way by their parents, then YES. you have no idea what you are talking about.
You're kidding right? I've read the material, it's a .37-.40 correlation between women and a .50-.57 correlation in men. Heritability does not mean there is no choice, it means that there is a tendency to adopt those behaviours. As there is in many other things that have strong correlation between family (crime, intelligence, etc.).
you've 'read the material'?? first of all, where does this 'material' come from?? did you read it as part of a course of study, or did you just pull it off the net and determine that you are now qualified to make the difinitive statement on transgendered people are and have experienced in their lives?? how do you explain TG people with brothers and sisters who are not??
because for me, it sounds like you are stating that its the parenting skills of the parents which is responsible for the child being transgendered, and i'm curious to see what studies you have found that back this statement up.
on top of that, i am in the process of raising three biological children, and have done extended care for 13 foster children, working very closely with biological parents to help them learn to care for their children upon their return to the home.
So then, what if your children were TG? Is there any biological indication for them to turn out that way?
if my kids were TG, i'd make an appointment with our family doctor to begin the process.
again, the fact that you make a statement like that shows that you have NO IDEA what you are talking about when you discuss concepts like aversion therapy or behaviour modification techniques. in fact, you sound like someone who has watched 'a clockwork orange' and now feels they can be a psychiatrist.
I'm not saying that people can be programmed like a computer, but you can certainly instill gender identity into a child. If not, then where does gender identity come from? Is it in mens genes to watch hockey while women watch figure skating?
besh, above you are making statements about percentages as it relates to inheritance, and now you make a statement like THIS?!?!
really, besh, what kind of formal training DO you have??
on what professional grounds do you make that claim, besh?? do you understand what dissociative behaviour is??
I'm not making these statements under the claim that I am any sort of psychiatric or psychological professional. Though it does help your argument to undermine my person. I guess it's easy to argue when you argue fallaciously.
so, you are saying that you really have no training or study in the field of psychiatry then??
well, that certainly frames your statements differently...
considering that people who get gender reassignment surgery only do so after years of mental therapy, i wonder on what grounds you make a claim like this... because with this statement, you are basically calling into question the competence of psychiatrists with years and years of education and experience.
I am not calling into question the usage of TG operations to "cure" gender identity disorder.
thats not what i said, besh... what i said was that current psychiatric practice and study pretty much flies in the face of what you are saying here. i am saying that its laughable that you feel confident in saying all that you have said here.
how many years of psychiatry training and experience have you had, besh??
Fallacious ad hominem
nope, again i am simply attempting to understand where your 'information' is coming from, and from what place you are in that you can state that it is parenting techniques which are responsible for TG in their offspring, to the point where you feel comfortable saying that you would call their parenting skills into question.
can you cite some sources, please??
MC jae
ninjafaery wrote: Beshpin's
Posted on: 12/07/2009 20:13
Beshpin's going to raise his kid in a Skinner Box, doncha know.
*chuckle* I had much the same thought, ninja, though I didn't know there was such a thing as a Skinner box.
SG
Beshpin, Do you travel
Posted on: 12/07/2009 21:06
Beshpin,
Do you travel outside your box? We had to fight and go to the Human Rights Commission to get what progress there is that younguns take for granted as always being there. I can tell you that business professional attire was WHATEVER the employer deemed it to be and it CAN BE and STILL IS gender based.
A TG friend who once worked nights and weekends on a Beer Store program for the Ontario call centre giant, Minacs, now known as Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc., left that position because moving to another program and working 9-5 meant a company dress code. That dress code was a jacket and skirt for females. Pants were not allowed. When pants were eventually allowed, by going to HR and claiming discrimination, they allowed women were to wear slacks and closed toed shoes AND hose. That is less than 8 years ago.
I am sorry, but me in pantyhose is like a woman in a jock strap.
Want to know what a person with a birth vagina faces, that is gender based and ridiculous if you ask me...read:
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=1435848
Now, imagine that person has a birth vagina but lives TG or as the opposite gender or is simply butch. Yeah, I can so picture me wearing makeup in my skin coloured tights and my skirt. Again, Ernest Borgnine in drag.
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: sighsnootles
Posted on: 12/08/2009 08:04
you've 'read the material'?? first of all, where does this 'material' come from?? did you read it as part of a course of study, or did you just pull it off the net and determine that you are now qualified to make the difinitive statement on transgendered people are and have experienced in their lives?? how do you explain TG people with brothers and sisters who are not??
because for me, it sounds like you are stating that its the parenting skills of the parents which is responsible for the child being transgendered, and i'm curious to see what studies you have found that back this statement up.
I don't need any specific study, the first thing you learn about behavioural genetics is that heredity only creates a tendency towards one behaviour or another. It does not forgo blame, it explains why.
so, you have said that you would question the parenting practices of parents with a child who identifies as TG.
what studies do you base that statement on??
I was asking about how you would explain where your child's GID came from. Not what you would do about GID.
i'm saying that it would have nothing to do with my parenting skills.
again, cite your studies that back up your claim that parenting skills are responsible for offspring who are TG, and that children are not born TG but created to be TG by their parents.
really, besh, what kind of formal training DO you have??
I'm a psych major. So then, where do gender roles come from?
again, besh, i'm questioning your statement that parents create offspring who are TG. show me your data to back that up.
as you are a psych major, i look forward to seeing it.
How does it affect my argument other than to undermine my expertise, therefore assaulting my person? What you're doing is argumentum ad hominem, in the same way that:
John makes the claim that apples are red.
John is not an apple farmer.
Thus, we can safely reject the claim that apples are red.
not at all.
it is more like:
john claims that apple varieties (granny smith, macintosh) come about because of how the apple farmer prunes the trees in the fall.
john is neither an apple farmer or a scientist.
therefore, we should seriously question johns statement before accepting it as fact.
Quite to the contrary, professionals in the psychological and psychiatric field have deemed that the best resolution to GID is SRS. This does not mean that any sort of personal or societal progress is happening, merely that there is a "solution" to GID.
again, besh... lets see some data.
Unfortunately, unless you have access to databases such as psycinfo or psycarticles you would not be able to follow the links I have used. You might be able to find the study by Coolige, Thede, and Young online somewhere.
well then, lets see it.
i am curious to see what data you have to back up your claim that people who are TG have parents with 'questionable' parenting skills.
Parenting has much to do with how children view gender norms and roles. Even sociologists know that young children learn much about their role in society through imitation.
i don't dispute that, besh... i have seen it first hand.
what i do dispute is that a person who is TG has parents who created their GID.
Quite frankly, we're carrying on a debate that has raged in psychology for more than 100 years. What has more to do with psychology, nature or nurture? Since neither of us is going to convince the other and because there is enough data to support either premiss, I move that we try to migrate the conversation from whether or not GID is heritable and more towards the original argument, which was how prevelance of SRS in society contributes to "progress", or rather how having SRS could be considered growth of our species.
so, rather than actually show me some data to back up your claim that people with TG have parents with 'questionable parenting skills', you want me to just believe that this is an accepted theory, without having seen any data to support this claim??
i'm not sure why i should do that...
If you'd like to talk more on the issue of where gender roles come from, I'd be more than willing to discuss that.
again, besh... its your claim that 'questionable parenting skills' lead to people who identify as TG that i'm taking issue with.
so far, you haven't shown me any data to back that claim up.
sighsnootles
Beshpin wrote: Actually a
Posted on: 12/08/2009 08:06
Actually a skinner box is quite different from what is being shown. A skinner box is a small box or aparatus that usually has an electrified floor and a level/pecking point. Why bother explaining, I'll just find you a picture...
holy crap, besh... i'm not even going to touch that one.
SG
Beshpin, With lines like,
Posted on: 12/08/2009 09:33
Beshpin,
With lines like, "I don't need any specific study, the first thing you learn about behavioural genetics is that heredity only creates a tendency towards one behaviour or another. It does not forgo blame, it explains why."
You, in my opinion, lose all credibility coming at this from any sort of scientific angle. I know few, who know science well, who claim they do not need specific studies, because their mind is already made up or that would not be open to new research.
I may agree that heredity and a genetic marker create a tendency. Let's say we are speaking of breast cancer, it does not mean all people with that family history or genetic markers will go on to have breast cancer. It also does not mean that there is a concrete something more that can solve it all neatly in a bow or one can "blame" it on. I will not leap, as you have to conclusions.
Now, simply using a word like "blame", again seems more personal than scientific. Perhaps, try "causal" to at least appear to be coming at it from a scientific angle.
The concept of what we call gender comes from many places. There are those, like yourself, who lean more to believe it is conditioning in life. Nurture. There are others who lean to believe gender comes from social roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes considered. Nurture. There are others who will cite "masculine" and "feminine" attributes, behaviours without conditioning or societal influence. Nature. Gender identity is hard to assess in animals, science seems to understand that. It is difficult to distinguish in animals between gender identity and sexual orientation.
Science will also tell you that studies focus on gender role behaviours because gender identity is graded and hard to quantify.
Science will also tell you hormones play a role in human behaviour and acknowledge it is difficult to devise experiments that examine that role. They ackowledge cultural and societal variables but they also look at things like congenital adrenal hyperplasia and Klinefelter. Now, all those with hormonal imbalance or congetital conditions do not feel TG. So, one can, as I do, believe that endocrine and psychological factors must interact. Have you looked at the research on the role of androgens role in gender identity/behaviour? What about research by Imperato-McGinley, Peterson, Stoller, Goodwin...
Yes, there are those who believe that human gender identity is more complex than animals. Personally, I view that as anthropocentric.
We do know that in animals we can change their sex postures (deemed male and female behaviours) during coitus by hormonal manipulation.
Gender identity and gender role behavior usually develop in conformity with the sex assignment and the sex of rearing.
One can, as you have, decide that sex assignment at birth influences the parents and thus attitudes and the way a child is treated. Youc an decide that those social factors determine the human gender identity and that it is irreversible after early infancy. You would be in the company of folks like Money and Lev-Ran.
Yet, one cannot pretend that is the only game in town.
One can also have a diametrically opposite interpretation. You can look at me. I was considered typical female at birth, reared female but began showing tomboyish behaviour early and growing more and more masculine. Another obvious example is Caster Semenya. It blows holes in gender being soley societal or how one is reared.
What of the Dominican Republic family with a 5
-reductase deficiency who 18 of 19 affected, those raised female, changed gender role behaviour at puberty? There are those who believe reversal can happen after the age gender is assumed fixed by others.
IE Whatever role hormones may play may not happen fully until puberty.
There are still others who see gender as fluid.
Again, there is not one way. Although you prefer the "my way or the highway" approach.