JT's picture

JT

image

Interpretation please?

Hi all, I haven't been on here in a while but thought it was a good time to reenter the fray.

 A few nights ago, I saw a news clip with Stockwell (doris) Day announcing 9.5 billion dollars for new prisons.  He said we needed them because crime rates are rising but when pressed on the issue and reminded that stats show a decrease in crime, he said that it was because the crimes were unreported.  So, which of the following seems to be the case:

The conservatives have a plan to arrest perpetrators of unreported crime to fill these new prisons?

They're spending 9.5 billion to give us the impression we're all in great danger and without our Harperite saviors, we'll be overrun with rampaging (but anonymous) criminals?

Good old Stockwell's been given the job of Treasury Board President as an affirmative action plan to put those who are incompetent to work?

All the polls are wrong and we really are in great danger if we don't lock up many more people?

 

Have I missed any other answers?

Share this

Comments

RitaTG's picture

RitaTG

image

I feel that indeed we do need

I feel that indeed we do need more prisons but not for Mr. Day's reasons.

Presently the prison system is overcrowded and that does not work well for the inmates or the staff.    We know a person that is an inmate and it is not going well.

In my opinion there are 2 major problems with overcrowding and 1 big problem even beyond that.

Problem 1:    Overcrowding raises tensions within the prison population and makes it much harder for staff and inmates to cope.

Problem 2:     Overcrowding means that prisoners that should be retained are released way too soon and are again out there to reoffend which often happens.   The deterrence effect of having to "do the time" is greatly reduced because they know they will be released soon.    I volunteer at a local mission so I have seen some of this.

Problem 3:    This is the big one ..... there are not enough resources available for inmates for counselling, therapy, detox, education in many aspects and other such things to reduce the likelyhood of reoffending when released.  These resources must be increased both within the prisons themselves and also just as important ... aftercare and followup.

I have a few questions:    What would others think of mandatory (no time reduction or parole) prison terms for those found committing a crime with a weapon or carrying a concealed weapon such as a handgun?     I am very concerned with the increase in handgun use and there has to be a way to help deter this.   Yes there are knives and even common objects used as weapons and all that sort of thing would have to be worked out.    To me, there seems to be a need to take such offenders off the streets and stop the revolving door.     I would suggest and escalating system so that there is a significant increase in the sentance for subsequent offences.

Another question is this:  What do others think should be the conditions for bail for a person accused of crimes with weapons etc?     Should the bail conditions be stricter and grow even more strict with the person having a record of such?

If we are going to do such things then more prison space is required and I strongly feel that far better resources for the inmates during incarceration and afterwards is a must.

Thoughts please?

Hugs

Rita

GeoFee's picture

GeoFee

image

If you plan to prosecute a

If you plan to prosecute a war, you need to develop resources of various kind. For example, war against the poor would require police powers to manage the poor and prisons to house the delinquent and recalcitrant. To accomplish this you will siphon monetary resources from programs and processes ordered to support and encourage those pressed by the constraints of poverty. We will of course be asked why any government would make war on the poor - as if the phenomenon was scarce in history.

MikePaterson's picture

MikePaterson

image

Rita, you're right... as far

Rita, you're right... as far as you go. The modern Canadian prison system is a travesty of what a " "justice" system should provide. But we DON'T need prisons. We need rehabilitative programmes and fits, and foremost, a serious commitment to ending poverty in this country. And we need better mechanisms for restorative justice.

The prisons are to accommodate the longer sentences the Conservatives are bringing in to show they care about law and order even though, thanks to the same folk, we won't have the information to know where poverty is going. Then there's the warplanes -- a gesture to help the recovery of the U.S. economy as, after all, they are our BEST friends. 

Prison reforms -- and far cleverer sentencing options -- are urgent and essential. At the moment, there are very few programmes going and it's not unknown for a stupid young guy who's gone joy-riding in someone else's car or who has sold some weed, to get a six-month sentence during which he picks up a drug habit and HIV ... his sentence is thereby turned into a death sentence.

The Harper government MUST go! It's being driven by a totally anti-democratic and highly unjust ideology.

GeoFee's picture

GeoFee

image

MikePaterson wrote:The Harper

MikePaterson wrote:
The Harper government MUST go! It's being driven by a totally anti-democratic and highly unjust ideology.

 

With what will we replace the present government?

RitaTG's picture

RitaTG

image

MikePaterson ...... would you

MikePaterson ...... would you please give me your thoughts on how to address the issue of the use of weapons such as handguns during crimes etc?     I certainly agree that much improved social programs will be a huge help.   But how would should we handle the more hard core element that will always be there?    I hope you can decipher what I mean by that. 

Hugs

Rita

MikePaterson's picture

MikePaterson

image

 Hi Rita: It seems to me that

 Hi Rita: It seems to me that we have an entertainment industry the glorifies violence and glorifies guns. There is very rarely any attention given in entertainment to the healing and suffering of assault victims, the criminal proceedings and family grief, the guilt and the insurance and family financial consequences of getting shot dead. We are used to seeing complicated and deep-seated problems solved in half an hour or so of violent action on prime time television. And this is the cheapest most accessible for of "entertainment" and it's watched on average around six-seven hours A DAY by young people, including young people who, large as a result of poverty, racism and under-education, face a number of complicated and deep-seated problems... with the opportunity to get a gun and solve their problems in half an hour or so.... a bloody outcome seems likely.

 

I know a few good country boys who covertly brag about possessing hand guns. (I've even heard heard it said that it doesn't matter to much if a gun gets stolen because it'll wind up in Toronto and take out a few of them blacks... yes, this is in Canada and not too long ago). My solution? Lock up anyone with an unlicensed weapon. Give the gun registry some teeth. Most of the handguns (I know long guns are less of  athreat but they can and do get cut down) seem to come in from the U.S. that's a border protection issue. We should not let a single hand gun cross the border. This is where clampdowns have to happen... getting guns off the street... and combating the poverty and prejudice that marginalise have-nots. Poverty generates criminality as dysfunctionality: evolutionary scientists say that the prospect of a short and precarious life increases the good sense of high risk, quick-return action... like drug running and robbery.

JT's picture

JT

image

 Hi all, incompetence of Day

 Hi all, incompetence of Day aside, I think what much of this discussion is now about is the purpose of our prisons.  If we have them to hide away those with whom we do not wish to deal with, more is better.  If we have them as institutions through which we bring those who have strayed back into community, we are failing miserably.

Yes Rita, there is a protective aspect to the prison system.  Those who have shown a predilection of violence should be removed for the protection of others and to re-train them to be a functioning part of society.  Unfortunately, it has never been shown that there is a strong correlation between number of prisons, or length sentencing and decrease in crime.  If there was a connection, the US would be one of the safest countries in the world.  Also, the system we have now which is over crowded and under funded does little to actually rehabilitate (remember the Harperites cutting out funding for prison farms) and is instead a criminal university where young people learn from the best of the worst.  We want to train them to be members of our societies, not members of criminal cultures.

If this money was intended to make our prisons more theraputic and healthy places, I'd aplaud. It seems though that this money is being spent to keep us scared.

There was a great line from the movie K-pax: "Let me tell you something, Mark. You humans, most of you, subscribe to this policy of an eye for an eye, a life for a life, which is known throughout the universe for its… stupidity. Even your Buddha and your Christ had quite a different vision; but nobody's paid much attention to them, not even the Buddhists or the Christians."

RitaTG's picture

RitaTG

image

MikePaterson ..... I agree

MikePaterson ..... I agree with so many of your points! ..... we are a society that glorifies violence and makes it into entertainment.   In many ways I feel we are in the same league as the old Roman coliseum games.   Your story about the "country boys" was especially disgusting and I realize that we have such.    Your thoughts on handgun control speaks right to the issue of getting guns like that off the streets.    There we see a need for prisons as there will always be those that unfortunately that is the restraint needed.

JT and MikePaterson .... I heartily agree that social programs to address the root issues is by far the best way to deal with crime on a large scale.   For every dollar spent on prisons I would love to see 5 spent wisely on sound programs.   I have never been a fan of prisons for the purpose of punishment.   Prisons should be used first and foremost to protect the public and just as important ...rehabilitate....     There are those we do need protection from and I feel we can all agree there are such cases BUT that need not be the norm.   I have seen the results of prison applied as a criminal college and I have watched young people graduate time and again.    Some no longer come to the mission anymore as they have graduated to the "big house".     Our mission tries its best to offer practical programs for those that are caught up in that lifestyle.

I am so glad to hear the comments from both of you and I sincerely hope that there would be a day soon when we as Canadians face this issue properly and compassionately and do what is right.

Thank you and HUGS

Rita

MikePaterson's picture

MikePaterson

image

 It's been a while, but I did

 It's been a while, but I did some regular prison visiting in Kingston Ontario, and my daughter more recently did a nursing placement at a penitentiary.And things seem to have gor worse rather than better over the past 30 years.

I think my daughter and I'd agree: most inmates are sad and stupid, expressing violence mostly as anger and for want of communication skills. Many are not violent at all... drug addicts, abused kids, losers, victims of bullies and foster parent families, victims of the system... screwed up sad, sad people with nowhere else to go. A few are systematically vindictive, manipulative, cruel and entirely self-focused. They do okay in prison because they quickly get into positions of running things. They recruit a following by giving other inmates addictive drugs and brutalising them... and these are the victim-people who really should be somewhere else.

And there are some who clearly should be in mental health wards.

Prison officers seem mostly to survive on strength of their cynicism, camaraderie and black humor... there aren't resources for them to do much more than stop inmates getting out. Some guards are very well intentioned but totally frustrated, and the inmates are truly tiresome to deal with because they seem hell-bent on making life as screwed up and self-damaging as they can.

In a civilised society, things would be very different. As it is, there is no honest attempt to work out why, for example, aboriginal peoples are so extremely over-represented in Canada's prison populations, and then other poor people and minorities... and how to do something to change that: again, it comes back to poverty and abuse and what is, frankly, a racist, selfish and greedy society.  To improve prison conditions and effectiveness, we have a lot of work to do on ourselves, our communities and the education of our young people. We have to shift some core values. That's an enormous challenge.

Jim Kenney's picture

Jim Kenney

image

I once read that in old

I once read that in old Jewish law, property crimes met with property punishments and  bodily crimes (such as assault or murder) were met with bodily punishments (like beatings and imprisonment).  We have too many people in jail who should not be there, as pointed to by a couple of the posters above, resulting in inadequate resources for the people who should be there, and premature release of people who are dangerous to others.  As disgusted as I am by the crimes of people like Conrad Black, and as much as I dislike his attitude, his crimes should have been dealt with by property/financial punishments rather than imprisonment.

I will be making a post in the Marijuana thread in a few minutes dealing with related issues.

Back to Politics topics