FishingDude's picture

FishingDude

image

Stay in dull marriage or get divorced?

A friend of mine is a firefighter and was married to a woman who had 2 children from a previous marriage, they then had 3 more together, all living in the same house! we grew to know them through the years but it all crashed and he had to get his own place for a while. He seemed a survivor. The wife actually spoke to my wife crying and saying she wanted him to come home, but the way he was describing it sounded like he just wanted out. They had bitter domestic stuff and it seemed to get worse.

Now, he met a new woman and they were married within weeks! we thought their marriage was ok because we only saw him or heard occasionally.

He came home one day and she had taken all her stuff out and gone! I got personal with him and asked if sex life was good. He said "Not really" but she was quite attractive. I found her aloof personally, not easy to get comfortable and aqauinted with. Turns out she had been abused.

Now he marries again, so its 3 times! and get this.... she is the cousin of his former wife! he knew her while married to previous woman.

 

He tried to keep the 3rd marriage low key because he believes divorce is sin. His parents are IRISH and very very very PROTESTANT!

My wife and I are friends with him and she really doensn;t agree with what he's doing. (of course) I think hes trying to fill his void in partners that turn out to be not what he expected.

However he speaks well of this new one, she is sick with something and he says she is sweet.

The thing is I don't know how some people do it, get divorced and remarried that many times! I honestly don';t know if I could do it!  starting over sounds hard. Not just the relational thing but financially you get deep when your married with bills,mortgage beneficiarie and all that.  I would not like to put my small children through it. If I did, I would wait until they are older. But I have honestly threatened leaving couple of times. I think everyone deals with it who is married, if they don't then I want to know there secret!

Even sex can be good, but you can still not stand each other! 

I actually think the guy should not get married....just live with them. Why do all that over and over. Your the same common law anyway! He has the frown of God hanging over his head looking down on him too much. But seriously when is divorce justifiable? granted I know with abuse and assault for sure! but without getting too personal how has it been for you?

I know there's counselling too but it doesn't always work.

I'm curious about divorce????????? 

I felt like hearing from others about divorce experiences. You don't have to get into too much detail about it  personally

Share this

Comments

kaythecurler's picture

kaythecurler

image

I'm not divorced, so I don't

I'm not divorced, so I don't have any experience myself.

Personally I married planning to have it last - it has been tough sometimes - but we are still together.

Divorce is hard on kids, even if they are adult when the split comes.

To me it seems a bit silly to keep marrying and divorcing - a bit like younger people sleeping around (but with more at stake.)

I don't think that there is a God frowning down on the people who divorce!

 

DaisyJane's picture

DaisyJane

image

What a story.  I agree.  It

What a story.  I agree.  It sounds like he is looking to fill a void and struggling to do so.

 

I don't think I have anything valuable to add to the discussion only to say that these stories seem more common than I initially thought.  My husband and I are in our early 40's and in the last two years we have watched the majority of our social circle separate.  There are a still some married couples left but it would be less than 50%.  In a camping group of five couples we are the only ones left married.  Sadly, all have children.  Some had affairs (again, more common than I would have thought), some shared that their marriages had been empty for years.  In all but one case we thought they were happy. It's very sad.

 

I agree that marriage is hard work.  I would think that all marriages have had rough patches.  Even patches where one wondered whether they might become one of the statistics.  Certainly we have had difficult patches.  What helps is that I honestly don't think the grass is greener anywhere else.  I think my own grass is pretty darn green!  I married a great guy and even though he drives me crazy at times I don't think I could ever find anyone better suited to me. I wonder if that is part of the breakdown of the marriage.  It gets rough and one looks out to the great beyond and thinks somewhere it might be better.

 

I have watched people very close to me go through similar situations to the one you describe.  I agree it seems that they are trying to fill some sort of void.  What I think they don't realize is that the emptiness is within them and only they can fill it, not another person.

DaisyJane's picture

DaisyJane

image

Just an additional

Just an additional thought.  My comment about the grass is greener elsewhere.  There are times that is true and a person should go look for that grass.  I agree that separation makes sense when the other partner is abusive, abuses substances and, in some cases, adulterous (the three A's).  The last I think is very complex issue.  Initially I would have said that an affair is a deal breaker.  However, having now witnessed two marriages where adultery was part of the breakdown I do think those marriages might have been salvageable.  I'm not quite as sure these days (about the affair piece being a deal breaker) and I do think that in some cases the marriage might be salvageable if the partners are interested in saving the marriage. What I witnessed was affairs that were symptoms of trying desperately to fill a void and had less to do with the quality of the marriage than I would have thought.  I wonder, in some cases, whether work with a professional counsellor trained in these areas could help address the void, work on forgiveness and repair a broken marriage.  This might be another tread topic...just some thoughts.

mrs.anteater's picture

mrs.anteater

image

I don't know why men are

I don't know why men are getting divorced and remarry- it might be different reasons than women. The women I know, including me, got divorced at a time, when prospect of hanging in there for another ten years or longer felt unbearable and just lead to depression.

Maybe people who have an affair think the grass is greener somewheres else- I don't have experience with that- I definitely didn't think so- I just wanted it to stop because it did not make any sense at all and was unhealthy for our son. Couseling did not bring anything, because my Ex's point of view was that the main problem was that I just need to be nicer to him. He did not take any responsibility for the situation.

 

I know now, what got my in this mess in the first place- I did not know him, when I married him, maybe a marriage prep couse would have helped open my eyes at that point and prevented our marriage, because we really weren't made for eachother.

I saw him as what he pretended to be and what I wanted him to be and ignored all the warning signs- he had no education, was unemployed (by choice to have more time for his hobbies), lived with his parents, was a messy, and had  debt- which I was way to eager to pay off from my savings to give us a "clean start".

Instead of in a partnership, we ended up in a parent-child relationship- with me being the taking-care- giver. How do you discuss issues with someone who agrees to everything? Of couse, his parenting "style"- was the same way- he wanted to please his son, be a playmate- but not set limits or shape him in anyway. I learned in couseling this was called "passive- aggressive". I also learned that he likely had ADD.

I could have worked with that and counseling, if he would have had any insight. But he didn't. That would have given me back a sense of respect for him. I also felt I did not want to have sex with someone anymore, who I don't respect and who I cannot communicate with.- As FishingDude suggests: you can have good sex with someone you don't even like- that might apply to some people, but not to me. Using sex to make up in conflicts - but not being able to talk about it- that just leave scars.

Just living together longterm without sex?- That was something my Ex could not imagine.

Our son turned 10- and the pre-puberty conflicts increased. The Ex could not stand conflicts. They are not to exist. My son and I tend to have heated conversations until the issue is resolved. I could not imaging parenting a teenager in one house together successfully. He needed consistency at least in one house. We separated with the help of a mediator and divorced within a year.

He moved to Alberta within 8 months.After telling his co-workers that his son is the most important thing in his life,go figure. He was only able to see himtwo weeks a year, because of that. It continued to hurt me, watching him make promises about visits and all the cool stuff they are going to do together- which then didn't happen. Now, 5 yrs later, his son has developed some insight through disappointment and gets only exited with caution. Financially, even after having to pay him half of the value of everything we owned- I finally get to save some money. (He never wanted to work full-time and he still doesn't).

Would I ever marry again? - probably not. I don't think I could afford another divorce.

 

FishingDude's picture

FishingDude

image

Thank you ladies for your

Thank you ladies for your input! sometimes the grass does look greener on the other side, for a lot of things!

"God frowning on him" is just a perception I think he feels in feeling the "christian guilt" of being raised by fundamental conservative parents. Divorce is allways "frowned upon" in that description, or should uphold the marriage sacraments and vows.

Just my own term also.

I wouldn't let it psychologically impact me religously or spiritually.

Someone disagreed with me marrying my wife because they did not like her. I don't know if the words of a friend are valued all the time.

 

I think if someone wants out and they mean it... then so be it. I know of two other guys who dabbled in affairs on facebook interestingly. My wife does not like facebook. Doesn't use it. Can be used for good and bad obviously. Both marriages nosedived because of adultery. Felt bad for the children. I knew these two guys and thought they were in the wrong but whom I to judge.

One guy went as far as bringing girls he met  into their home while the wife was out. Also while she was sleeping upstairs.

 

Sometimes all the right signs can be there in the beginning, even first few years of marriage, and you can do the marriage prep and then down the road people change or do things that really tick you off. If they don't change you just might lose it. Explode, get into alcohol or whatever. 

Just to be realistic about it, as the expert books say, men are hardwired for looks in women. The physical attraction. Women want the emotional pillow talk.  Men at least from what I have noticed, and mainstream have affairs because they are either addicted to sex and pornography. Or they just want a new fling! a new experience to be with someone different! or they basically can't stand their partner at all. Instead of eating fried chicken all the time they want to try some juicy T-bone steak! some guys I know of first hand think nothing of it to sleep around with someone else while they are with a spouse or partner. 

Its the thrill and the trophy collection to say "they got her in bed!" like its an ego boost for them. Mainstream society and advertising, billboards, bus signs, magazines just constantly barrage the mind. (Kim Kardashian especially challenging for me! slap from my wife!)

I think the marriage laws were more common place in middle eastern ancient practice during biblical times.

Nowadays seems more liberal and open to freedom of  ones rights and wishes to leave a particular signed contract or covenant with God.

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

FishingDude wrote:But

FishingDude wrote:
But seriously when is divorce justifiable? granted I know with abuse and assault for sure! but without getting too personal how has it been for you?

 

I believe that biblically divorce is justifiable under only two conditions. The first is when infidelity has occured. The second is when a non-Christian spouse abandons his/her Christian partner.

Witch's picture

Witch

image

I think we Pagans tend to

I think we Pagans tend to have a more practical view of Marriage than some other religions.

 

Most of our marriages include the oath "so long as love shall last"

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

Witch wrote: I think we

Witch wrote:

I think we Pagans tend to have a more practical view of Marriage than some other religions.

 

Most of our marriages include the oath "so long as love shall last"

 

How does your religion define love?

DaisyJane's picture

DaisyJane

image

Ramblin Jae

Ramblin Jae wrote:

FishingDude wrote:
But seriously when is divorce justifiable? granted I know with abuse and assault for sure! but without getting too personal how has it been for you?

 

I believe that biblically divorce is justifiable under only two conditions. The first is when infidelity has occured. The second is when a non-Christian spouse abandons his/her Christian partner.

 

Is that your opinion as well Jae? Or are you just commenting on what you understand the Bible as saying.

 

I am like Witch and have a much more pragmatic view.  If two people are truly unhappy then I do believe they should constructively end the marriage.  I also believe it is very sad when that happens, particularly if there are children are involved.  However, research does tell us that single parent families or post-divorce/constructive co-parenting models can be much healthier places for children than living within a toxic marriage.

 

As well, in terms of abuse, the God I look to would not want a person to stay in a relationship where they are continually abused.

sighsnootles's picture

sighsnootles

image

as to the origional situation

as to the origional situation in this thread, i agree with the statement that he is looking to fill some void with a relationship...  imho this guy is under the impression that he needs a wife to complete him somehow.  if you are looking for a person to complete you, then there isn't a person alive who will be able to fill that void... you have to be complete and satisfied in your own skin.  once you love yourself the way that you are, then finding and living with a partner for the rest of your life will become a reality.

 

thats my experience, anyways.  i have a few friends who have been through divorce, and in each instance it seemed to me that they felt that as soon as the first blush of love disappeared, as it always will do, that meant that they weren't in love with that person anymore.  and when someone else came along who gave them that whole 'weak in the knees - butterflies in the stomach' feeling, that seemed to be proof to them that they had made a mistake and so needed to get a divorce.

 

heck, i get that whole 'weak in the knees' feeling from other men occasionally myself.  that doesn't mean that my marriage was a mistake... it means that i'm a normal human heterosexual female. 

boneswife's picture

boneswife

image

signsnootles, I disagree with

signsnootles, I disagree with you.  There are those of us who are more complete with a partner than without.  That doesn't mean I am unhappy alone, I am just happier with someone special to share my life with

A former minister at our church once said that she read somewhere (I forget where) that each person has 5 "life partners"  sometimes it is the same person because you grow and change together.  Sometimes, it is different people because the person you were at 20 is not the person you are at 50.  Drugs and alcohol have nothing to do with it.

lastpointe's picture

lastpointe

image

 Certainly sounds like this

 Certainly sounds like this guy has a few issues.

 

Perhaps he is too bloody fussy to be married.

 Perhaps he has never learned the give and take that go into a long term relationship.

Perhaps he is afraid/unwilling to be alone and get to know himself.

Perhaps he has the attention span of a gnat and so only likes the chase and the challenge of winning a new love, but has no ability to actually grow with his new spouse.

 

I imagine that there are lots of people who give up too easily on marriage.  The grass is always greener.  Sadly they will work their butts off to woo a new spouse iinstead of putting all that energy into the current spouse.

 

I do believe that there are instances where divorce is the only viable option.  Sadly I think that those divorces aren't that common.  More common is the " this isn't what I signed on for so I'm outta here" type of divorce.

sighsnootles's picture

sighsnootles

image

boneswife

boneswife wrote:

signsnootles, I disagree with you.  There are those of us who are more complete with a partner than without.  That doesn't mean I am unhappy alone, I am just happier with someone special to share my life with

 

 

what you have said here isn't any different than what i said...

 

i think that if you are LOOKING FOR SOMEONE TO MAKE YOU HAPPY, then you are going to have an unhappy life.  you need to be happy yourself.

 

you said above that you aren't unhappy alone, but that sharing your life with someone makes your life happier. 

 

thats pretty much exactly what i feel as well.

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

DaisyJane wrote:Is that your

DaisyJane wrote:
Is that your opinion as well Jae? Or are you just commenting on what you understand the Bible as saying.

 

That's my understanding of what the Bible says. Of course, I also believe life is best lived in keeping with God's Word.

 

Quote:
As well, in terms of abuse, the God I look to would not want a person to stay in a relationship where they are continually abused.

 

We agree that God would not want a person to stay in a situation in which they are being continually abused. However, in such a case I would recommend the couple seperate, not divorce, until the abuser receives appropriate counselling to learn how not to abuse, and the abused is ready to continue with the marriage.

DaisyJane's picture

DaisyJane

image

Jae.  I agree that saving the

Jae.  I agree that saving the marriage and addressing the underlying issues that might lead to abuse is an excellent idea via professional counselling.  I agree that if the marriage can be saved that and the partners want that then that is wonderful.

 

 

What if counselling fails?  It does happen.  Would you be comfortable with divorce after a genuine attempt to reconcile that failed? 

DaisyJane's picture

DaisyJane

image

I agree with much of what

I agree with much of what sigh and and lastpointe have suggested.  I do believe that there are marriages that can destroy one's soul (drugs, alcohol, abuse, infidelity, or as one poster pointed out, childlike behaviour that becomes impossible because it means you might be married to a child).  In those cases I do think that leaving is probably a healthy decision.  Life is to short and uncertain to remain shackled to someone and something that destroys your soul and does not hold the potential for happiness.

 

However, I also agree that I have seen many marriages fail because life got boring and some form of mid-life, existential crisis  set in. In those cases a bit of Jae's attitude of being committed to the overall institution of marriage is an excellent thing I would think.  It forces you to constructively work on the marriage even if you don't really want to.  I do think that some of the marriages I have watched crumble in the last few years (and in the early forties I have seen several, sadly) were a result of that.....That feeling of "someone else makes me feel alive again and this other guy/girl that has been there for 20+ years and doesn't.  I want butterflies in my stomach again.  I want to feel young and alive".  I get that.  It's just that I am not always convinced jumping ship was necessary and that the marriage could have been saved with two willing participants. It can be very sad to watch (speaking from very personal experience).

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

DaisyJane wrote:What if

DaisyJane wrote:
What if counselling fails?  It does happen.  Would you be comfortable with divorce after a genuine attempt to reconcile that failed?

 

No, just with continued separation.

Mendalla's picture

Mendalla

image

Abuse and assault for sure.

Abuse and assault for sure. Adultery can be worked on, but it depends on the circumstances. If it's just a case of compatibility or the marriage just running out of steam, I'd hope the couple would try counselling or other approaches before ending it.

 

The man in the OP sounds like a serial monogamist who believes it's important to be married but not necessarily to stay married. My only concern about the behaviour is what impact it has on his partners.

 

And jae, the attitude you express is one that has kept victims of domestic abuse in dangerous situations for years. If abuse, especially physical violence. is involved, the ability to get out and stay out is vital. No God that I would worship would force someone to stay in a situation where their lives and health are in danger. And counselling, from what I've read and seen, doesn't usually cut it in these cases and often delays a woman (and victims usually are women, though there are male victims, too) from making a clean break that is needed to save her life. Her life and health are more important than some abstract, religious notion of the unbreakability of the bond of marriage. If it makes you feel better, think of it as abandonment because the abuser very clearly does not really care about the abused, just treats them as a useful piece of property.

 

Mendalla

 

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

Mendalla wrote:And jae, the

Mendalla wrote:
And jae, the attitude you express is one that has kept victims of domestic abuse in dangerous situations for years.

 

Separation keeps them in? Interesting take.

 

Quote:
No God that I would worship would force someone to stay in a situation where their lives and health are in danger.

 

Agreed. God does not coerce.

FishingDude's picture

FishingDude

image

Using this guy that I know as

Using this guy that I know as an example of the topic on divorce, I don't want to reveal too much because then I feel like I'm talking about him personally. I havn't disclosed his name or anything, he is a good natured guy and all the cards are in the right deck, he is smart, owns a beautiful home. Hardworking, respectful. But these other women are willing participants also. Plus the first wife was already divorced as well as the second.

So there is no innocence on any part in my opinion.

Overly aggressive, controlling mood prone women can make life miserable for a guy.

That famous "christian" singer Sandy Patti carried on an affair for a long time.

 

Men are generally the more abusive and when it comes to what I have observed and heard about. What seems to be the case in relationships is that it does have more to do with the guys!

Some men just don't grow up and get an attitude change! they played with their toys and the toys became bigger later in life. From tonka trucks to 4 wheelers and jet ski's.

They want to run away to the sports bar with their buddies and pound back beers instead of go to the park with their family.

I don't have a lot of respect for these kinds and they don't fit anywhere in my life.

Men either by mental disturbance(low serotonin) or aggression prone, didn't get hugged from mom and dad enough or something can be controlling and abusive verbally. Noticed this from experience. 

The religioius nut case syndrome can apply too.

I drink, but alcohol and an aggressive abuse prone individual can be dangerous for a passive woman in that marriage.

I'll have one beer after a days work but I don't like to get drunk because it leads to stupidity. Thats what the bible warns against- drunkeness. Not drinking in general.  

 

Mendalla's picture

Mendalla

image

Lodestar wrote: Separation

Lodestar wrote:

Separation keeps them in? Interesting take.

 

It doesn't keep in physically, but it also does not free them to pursue a new, non-abusive relationship nor does it really give them the option to "leave it all behind and start over". They are still legally bound to their abuser which still gives that abuser some measure of control over them. Divorce gives them freedom and cuts that tie, taking some of the power back from the abuser. Separation is a first step, but if the abuse cannot be stopped then divorce has to be an option. 

 

Mendalla

 

RitaTG's picture

RitaTG

image

Well Jae ... if I

Well Jae ... if I may.....

One of my clients is a women's shelter ....

I have had to deal with very confidential data regarding abusive situations.

To any woman undergoing abuse I have one thing to say .... GET OUT!!!!!!

The stats are there ... counselling seldom works ...very very seldom.....

In my humble view ...... abuse is every bit as bad a adultery.

Adultery is being unfaithful to one's spouse ....to me abuse is a violent form of unfaithfulness.... it is being extremely unfaithful in the command to love your spouse.

Jae ...we disagree ..... I believe divorce is indeed necessary and biblically justified.

Especially with children .... I feel the abused woman has a duty to her children to break free.

My humble thoughts.....

Hugs

Rita

Mendalla's picture

Mendalla

image

RitaTG wrote: Well Jae ... if

RitaTG wrote:

Well Jae ... if I may.....

One of my clients is a women's shelter ....

I have had to deal with very confidential data regarding abusive situations.

To any woman undergoing abuse I have one thing to say .... GET OUT!!!!!!

The stats are there ... counselling seldom works ...very very seldom.....

In my humble view ...... abuse is every bit as bad a adultery.

Adultery is being unfaithful to one's spouse ....to me abuse is a violent form of unfaithfulness.... it is being extremely unfaithful in the command to love your spouse.

Jae ...we disagree ..... I believe divorce is indeed necessary and biblically justified.

Especially with children .... I feel the abused woman has a duty to her children to break free.

My humble thoughts.....

Hugs

Rita

 

Thanks, Rita. I'm speaking second hand. My UU fellowship supports a shelter down the street from us but I don't have direct experience of working there. You've obviously had some real experience with people in these situations. Love the way you tied abuse into adultery. Better than my attempt to tie it to abandonment.

 

Mendalla

 

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

Mendalla wrote: ...if the

Mendalla wrote:

...if the abuse cannot be stopped then divorce has to be an option. 

 

Mendalla

 

 

Biblically I do not believe that it is.

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

RitaTG wrote:To any woman

RitaTG wrote:
To any woman undergoing abuse I have one thing to say .... GET OUT!!!!!!

 

Well said Rita. I echo your words. GET OUT!!!!!!!

 

Quote:
In my humble view ...... abuse is every bit as bad a adultery.

 

Agreed. However, I still do not believe it is a justifiable reason for divorce.

graeme's picture

graeme

image

I divorced after some six

I divorced after some six years of marriage and two children. It was the biggest mistake I ever made. You cannoot divorce without it affecting the children. I visited them (from some considerable distance), and also spent summers with them. They turned out well. But I was irresponsible for leaving them.

i still remember the day, I was nine, when my father left to volunteer  for the navy, though he had two children and was over draft age.. Our relationship was never again the same.

Looking back, I think I divorced for the same reason my father jjoined the navy. I wanted freedom and adventure.

Since then, I've remarried, and have three more children. Nothing on earth would make me repeat the selfishness of my divorce. I shall always regret I was not the father I should have been.

Certainly, an abused person should divorce - and should take the children. But, otherwise, divorce should be out of the question where children are involved.

 

FishingDude's picture

FishingDude

image

My greatest regret also would

My greatest regret also would be dragging our children through it and not being the kind of dad needed 24/7 to them. 

 

Jae your getting me confused with your name changing, just stick with one will ya!

somegirl's picture

somegirl

image

I left my son's father

I left my son's father because he started doing crack and became abusive towards me and my son.    Addiction is the same as adultery in my mind.  The drug becomes an all consuming passion for the addict and family no longer matters.  In fact it is worse than adultery.  At least an adulterer may have some energy, feelings and care left for family.  It was a terrible experience. 

lastpointe's picture

lastpointe

image

graeme, thanks for that

graeme, thanks for that post.  I have seldom if ever, heard someone say that divorcing when they had kids was a mistake.  Most wouldn't say it. even if they might feel some guilt

 

 

chemgal's picture

chemgal

image

 Jae, sometimes in order for

 Jae, sometimes in order for someone to leave they have to cut all ties, including getting divorced.  If someone needs to get a restraining order, I don't know how seriously the courts would take it if the couple is still legally married.  There are also problems with privileges that a spouse would have.  This  would allow stalking to be made easier and also leaves the victim more prone to financial problems (the spouse getting access to accounts, credit, etc).

 

If someone's spouse dies do you think it is wrong for them to remarry?  If not, why is it wrong if they are 'widowed' by an abusive partner that they must leave?

jon71's picture

jon71

image

I think in cases of abuse

I think in cases of abuse divorce is not only permissable but strongly advised. The Bible tells us we should love our spouses as CHRIST loved the church. In cases of abuse that marriage has gone so tragically far from the Biblical model it's a train wreck. If you're getting hit or mentally abused or whatever you are not in anything remotely like what GOD wants your marriage to be. Save yourself and maybe someday a real loving marriage will happen for you.

sighsnootles's picture

sighsnootles

image

RivermanJae wrote: Mendalla

RivermanJae wrote:

Mendalla wrote:

...if the abuse cannot be stopped then divorce has to be an option. 

 

Mendalla

 

 

Biblically I do not believe that it is.

 

in a situation where one spouse is abusing the other, then i would suggest that the marriage covenant made before god is void, then, and that the abused spouse can walk away from the relationship.

 

biblically, there was never a marriage covenant, so there is no divorce needed.

graeme's picture

graeme

image

It is almost always a mistake

It is almost always a mistake to pick out Bible rules one at a time and in isolation. If we do that, that genocide is okay because we can find a section where God told Israel to kill all of a neighbouring tribe.

Read the Bible as a whole. read for the evolution and spirit of it.  Use your common sense. That is really what Jesus tells us to do.

If you stay in an abusive marriage, you are not only risking your life but also risking the well being of the children. Get out; And take them with you.

 

gareme

Witch's picture

Witch

image

RivermanJae wrote: Mendalla

RivermanJae wrote:

Mendalla wrote:

...if the abuse cannot be stopped then divorce has to be an option. 

 

Mendalla

 

 

Biblically I do not believe that it is.

 

Biblically, marriage was a contract of ownership, and so the property really would not have the option of divorce other than for what was contained in the contract.

 

However marriage today, even for most literalist Christians, is no longer an issue of property, so to say that a woman can leave a marriage for infidelity, but not for being beaten half to death, because the Bible doesn't allow for it, is to releagate women back to being property.

RitaTG's picture

RitaTG

image

Jae .... plz read this

Jae .... plz read this ....

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/canada-wide-warrant-issued-for-man-who-set-fire-to-his-wife/article1647517/

Now ..... should this woman be allowed a divorce???

I wonder what advice Jesus would give her ...... what would he require .........

Hugs

Rita

SG's picture

SG

image

What one finds in the pages

What one finds in the pages of the Bible can differ. It is why some denominations weigh in differently on divorce.

 

Some turn to Mark 10 and leave no room for divorce or only for adultery and some only for men.  Some turn to 1 Corinthians and make room for divorcing an unbeliever.

 

It does not say in the Bible that you should divorce a murderer or a child molestor, even if they have killed or are molesting your children.... The Bible does not say one can divorce for that, but it says one can if they quit believing and leave or if they cheat. Hmmm.... There are exceptions to no divorce and what they ought to be we should use our minds and our hearts and compassion and mercy to find.

 

The vows we use in marriage ceremonies are love, honour and respect. They are from Exodus 21 and if one reads it applies to a woman taken as a slave and made a wife. Food clothing and love was what the lowest on the totem pole  should get.

 

Now, when Jesus came he said he fulfilled law, did not abolish it. So, everyone, including Paul in 1 Corinthians7, knew what the law was when they wrote what they did. 

 

Jesus was not there to say no to divorce, he allowed it as Moses had. He spoke to those who said any old cause to get rid of a wife was good enough and Jesus said it was hard hearts that thought that. Would he say it was also hard hearts who bound her to a batterer or rapist?

 

I do not think God likes divorce, but divorces occur and the Bible has things talking about it.

 

If you turn to Malachi 2:16 and read "I hate divorce" says the LORD God of Israel  I invite you to read the very words it is followed by. It is followed by how much God hates violence.

 

For myself, abuse in a marriage (physical, verbal;, emotional, spiritual, sexual...) is unacceptable to God.

 

For me, the insitution, any institution whether it is marriage, church.... is not loved by God as much as the individuals. Rules are not as important as people, that (to me) is all Jesus lived and died teaching. Read Matthew 12:1-8 Mercy trumps laws. The letter of the law kills...

 

Marriage, as we know it, it is supposed to be about protection and well-being, a safe place to turn, intimate and loving... when it is none of those things, is it a God blessed marriage?

 

It says what we matter to God all over the place from Colossians 3:19 to 1 Peter 3:7 to Ephesians 5.... Everywhere our bodies and minds are the temples of God. They are not to be abused by ourselves. How would we assume they could be by another and that be ok with God?

 

Now, though I tend not look not at the letter of the law, but the spirit of it,  I have looked to things like 1Corinthians 3: 16-17 and 2 Corinthians 6: 16-17..

 

Now abandonment comes into it with the comments on non-believers, because of 1 Corinthians 7:15? Is it only about believing and not believing, or is it about physical abandonment? Could it be extended to abandoning the principles and promises, breaking the covenant?

 

For me, as someone lies in a crumpled heap I cannot envision anyone sane hearing the voice of God saying "stay". I can only hear "get out, now, child". 

 

Having been there as a domestic violence counsellour with many a woman who has cried about her beliefs on marriage and divorce and the Bible...  I have watched without a word (because we were not permitted to discuss religion) and I have seen, regardless of their denomination or even their faith practice, as their face changes as they have their revelation and they  hear the voice of God saying, "I love you and I love you more than any rules"... I have seen them wrestle with the idea of counselling and when it has not worked watched them as they hear the voice that says "somethings, my child, you cannot change" 

 

"The letter of the law kills"....

 

On divorce, we should listen to Jesus and not have a hard heart or turn only to what biblical law says is or is not permissable . Our hearts and minds on the issue should honour God and the spirit in which it was meant and honour and respect God's all of creations.

 

For me, no person should feel they must die or be beaten or raped or degraded to somehow please God. Nor should they be made to feel it by others who are working through their own biblical lessons....

 

They should not feel forever bound legally or spiritually  to someone who is dangerous to their body, heart or soul. God values them too much.

mrs.anteater's picture

mrs.anteater

image

lastpointe wrote: graeme,

lastpointe wrote:

graeme, thanks for that post.  I have seldom if ever, heard someone say that divorcing when they had kids was a mistake.  Most wouldn't say it. even if they might feel some guilt

 

 

I don't think that there are many who do not feel guilt, especially when there are kids involved. So maybe the benefits still outweigh the negative?

Is there nobody on here who can imagine that inconsistent parenting or constant tension between the parents could be as damaging to kids as violence?

Not that the conflicts imediately stop when people separate, but with some common sense you can keep the coflicts more private and out of the kids ears. And eventually there is a chance of grass growing over those raw emotions with time.

Have you never been to a home where the climate was just so aweful, you were glad to get out of there? Would you like to live there as kids would have to?

Re: Being separated but not divorced- we had a couple at the hospital a while ago- they separated some 30 yrs ago, but never made it legal. He had a good pension, but was kind of like my Ex- unable to handle money. She was older when they separated and worked part-time afterwards, raising the kids, which left her just with old age pension. Now in his 70ties, he became very sick and was admitted to a nursing home. In that case in NS, the income of the spouse gets considered when the cost for the nursing home fee is determined. I don't know the details, but he had accumulated a lot of debt- and the Exwife ended up having to finance his cost from her much smaller pension. She was very nice to him, kept visiting him almost every day (he had no other visitors), also was a faithful person (maybe that was why she never divorced)- but she was quiet desperate , because it affected her quality of life so much, that she said financially she will have to divorce him now officially.

mrs.anteater's picture

mrs.anteater

image

Thanks SG.

Thanks SG.

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

chemgal wrote:If someone's

chemgal wrote:
If someone's spouse dies do you think it is wrong for them to remarry?  If not, why is it wrong if they are 'widowed' by an abusive partner that they must leave?

 

1.) No, because the marriage bond has been broken.

 

2.) I don't agree with your analogy. An abuser can learn a new life-way. A dead person is just dead.

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

jon71 wrote: I think in cases

jon71 wrote:

I think in cases of abuse divorce is not only permissable but strongly advised. The Bible tells us we should love our spouses as CHRIST loved the church. In cases of abuse that marriage has gone so tragically far from the Biblical model it's a train wreck. If you're getting hit or mentally abused or whatever you are not in anything remotely like what GOD wants your marriage to be. Save yourself and maybe someday a real loving marriage will happen for you.

 

And you're basing that on which books, chapters, and verses of the Bible? Can you please identify even one solid reference.

 

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

sighsnootles wrote:in a

sighsnootles wrote:
in a situation where one spouse is abusing the other, then i would suggest that the marriage covenant made before god is void, then, and that the abused spouse can walk away from the relationship.

 

That's not something I've read in the Bible. Perhaps you can enlighten me on just where it says that in the Holy Book. Thanks.

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

RitaTG]</p> <p>Jae .... plz

RitaTG]</p> <p>Jae .... plz read this ....</p> <p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/canada-wide-warrant-issued-for-man-who-set-fire-to-his-wife/article1647517/">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/canada-wide-warrant-issued-for-man-who-set-fire-to-his-wife/article1647517/[/quote</a>]</p> <p> Done.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>[quote wrote:
Now ..... should this woman be allowed a divorce???

 

In my own opinion, yes. However, I believe the Bible teaches she should not, so I will go with the Word of God over my own human thinking.

 

Quote:
I wonder what advice Jesus would give her ...... what would he require .........

 

I believe he would first be sad that such an incident occured, and concerned for all involved. I think he would warn the woman to leave the dangerous situation. I believe he would assure all involved of his love for them. I believe that he would explain that God sees marriage as a sacred bond that he expects to be kept.

Witch's picture

Witch

image

RivermanJae wrote: so I will

RivermanJae wrote:

so I will go with the Word of God over my own human thinking.

 

Perhaps you might consider the fallibility of assuming that the Bible is actually the literal Word of God, rather that human thinking about God.

 

Perhaps you should consider that God tells all sorts of people different things than are in your Bible. Their claims of God's word are no less valid than your claim that your Bible is all God wrote on the subject.

 

Perhaps you should stop eating ham and wearing poly-cotton blends, or is it only SOME things that God says in teh Bible that are relevant?

graeme's picture

graeme

image

It's no fun if you take

It's no fun if you take everything literally. I mean, there was the time when Jehovah bad-mouthed a neighbouring tribe, and told Israelists to killl them all without exception. So far, so good.

But some of those Israelites took good looking women as prisoners. So Jehovah got his knickers all in a twist. I mean, hey, it was only a few women.

FishingDude's picture

FishingDude

image

RivermanJae

RivermanJae wrote:

sighsnootles wrote:
in a situation where one spouse is abusing the other, then i would suggest that the marriage covenant made before god is void, then, and that the abused spouse can walk away from the relationship.

 

That's not something I've read in the Bible. Perhaps you can enlighten me on just where it says that in the Holy Book. Thanks.

Jae? if I was going to God's house every sunday with a big smile on my face sitting in the front pew letting the pastors sermon fly through one ear and out the other, then went home and beat the crap out of my wife, and just continued that on a regular weekly basis. Do you think it wise for my wife and kids to stay living in the same house with me? 

And if I chose not to change, do you think she should still uphold her marriage contract to me?

 

Should she have me arrested and have charges laid and put a restraining order on me?

just asking.

I bet men in the bible beat their wives and pretty bad, and got away with it. The men had more rights anyway. Jesus and Paul came to do away with that. I don't know if anything is mentioned about the subject of marriage abuse.

MorningCalm's picture

MorningCalm

image

FishingDude wrote:Jae? if I

FishingDude wrote:
Jae? if I was going to God's house every sunday with a big smile on my face sitting in the front pew letting the pastors sermon fly through one ear and out the other, then went home and beat the crap out of my wife, and just continued that on a regular weekly basis. Do you think it wise for my wife and kids to stay living in the same house with me?

 

Of course not. That's why I'm all in favor of separation under such circumstances. I've said that many many times now.

 

Quote:
And if I chose not to change, do you think she should still uphold her marriage contract to me?

 

Yes, because I believe that in God's eyes said marriage covenant continues. The bond has not been broken.

 

Quote:
Should she have me arrested and have charges laid and put a restraining order on me?

 

That decision would be hers to make.

jon71's picture

jon71

image

RivermanJae wrote: jon71

RivermanJae wrote:

jon71 wrote:

I think in cases of abuse divorce is not only permissable but strongly advised. The Bible tells us we should love our spouses as CHRIST loved the church. In cases of abuse that marriage has gone so tragically far from the Biblical model it's a train wreck. If you're getting hit or mentally abused or whatever you are not in anything remotely like what GOD wants your marriage to be. Save yourself and maybe someday a real loving marriage will happen for you.

 

And you're basing that on which books, chapters, and verses of the Bible? Can you please identify even one solid reference.

 

 Seriously? The analogy of spouse loving spouse as CHRIST loves the church is all throughtout the new Testament. Do you believe that abuse is an example of that kind of love? If so you back it up. My post had five sentences in it. Find one of them to be factually incorrect.  Arguably the first sentence is opinion albeit a very mainstream one.

sighsnootles's picture

sighsnootles

image

RivermanJae

RivermanJae wrote:

sighsnootles wrote:
in a situation where one spouse is abusing the other, then i would suggest that the marriage covenant made before god is void, then, and that the abused spouse can walk away from the relationship.

 

That's not something I've read in the Bible. Perhaps you can enlighten me on just where it says that in the Holy Book. Thanks.

 

a husband is to love his wife as jesus loves his bride, the church.

 

i was married in the church.  in my vows before god and the faith community, i promised to love my husband, and he promised to love me, forsaking all others. 

 

if a man beats his wife, then he is not loving her as jesus does.  show me in the bible where jesus physically assaults and calls it love.

 

therefore, he lied before god when he made the covenant, and the covenant never existed.  the wife is free and clear, as she was lied to.

 

 

 

 

 

SG's picture

SG

image

As I prepare to share a

As I prepare to share a wedding service with someone who is a legally recognized wedding officiant, I have a copy of the resource, "Our Wedding Book" in front of me as I type.

 

In each section, the couple can make selections of their choosing...

 

In the introduction, their option is to have " vows of love and loyalty".

 

Is it love to beat the tar out of another person or to ruin their self-esteem...? If I read 1 Corinthians 13 during the service, will anyone present, witness/guest, officiant or fiance think that si what love is? Is that what the BIble itself says love is?

 

As we approach God in prayer, their chosent option speaks of love, trust, faith and respect. It actually speaks of keeping them "safe from all trouble". We do also pray for a love that many waters cannot quench and that is stronger than death.

 

Can you trust someone who beats the shit out of you? Can you trust when they say they won't again and they do, time after time? Do you trust or walk on eggshells? Do you have faith in this person, in marriage? Can this daily terror make you even question the purpose of even living? Can it cause you to question the very existence of God? Can you respect someone who abuses another? Can that love turn to loathing? Can the trust turn to anxiety, apprehension, aversion, dread, horror....? Can you have faith in someone you cannot and should not trust?

 

In the address to the people, this service says that marriage "has been established and sactified for the welfare and the happiness of people individually and of society as a whole"....it mentions that "the future of our society depends on the quality of  home life"... "it is an event for all humanity"...

 

Is it for someone's welfare to stay being abused? Is it for their welfare that they can separate but not divorce?  Is it for the children's welfare that rather than, like myself, have a stepfather who has been my dad for 30+ years, I would be denied a loving stepfather as my mother stayed married to an abusive, incestuous, alcoholic for her entire lifetime?

 

My mom was Missouri Synod Lutheran and believed in her faith that she was an adultress until this other man died 19 years into her next marriage. She was taught, in words attributed to Martin Luther: "Let Christians know that by their divorce they cease to be Christians and become heathen and are in a state of damnation." For Luther, divorce cost a person their salvation. Now, even with langugae that strong,  Luther made room for divorce (later) My mom had a choice as she could not be celibate (personality wise and a medical condition making her over-sexed) and she needed financial and emotional help with her other children... so her choices are she could remarry and be a heathen or she could not and be a fornicator. What lovely choices, eh?

 

She did not want children with her new husband, because her faith said they would be bastards. She accidently got pregnant. What toll did all that take on her, her marriage, her children, thinking her life and her love was sinful, dirty, forbidden? That her child was a bastard? That they were bound for eternal damnation?

 

What toll did it take in the family with my Jewish faith? I was taught that without her husband wanting a divorce of his own freewill (she got one anyways) she was aqunah (still chained) and was still married. So, I believed that she should not have remarried. I was taught my step-father was just an extrmarital affair. My half brother and half sister were mamzerum (bastards). Makes for a lovely family dynamic doesn't it? How did my beliefs make my mother feel? My step-father? My siblings?

 

What does the Bible say about that? Maybe the whole of Roman 14 or something....

 

I can personally tell you what it feels like to be told your love is wrong, does not please God, is forbidden, that you face eternal damnation... to do it to one other human being for me is unconscionable. As you are someone I understand married to someone married previously, you would think one would find more compassion, jae. You do not have to answer, but one wonders how you reconcile what you say you believe with what you choose to do? Perhaps, her husband had remarried and you felt it was permitted then. There are biblical grounds that permit divorce and that permit remarriage.

 

Back to this wedding and its vows....In the questions of intention (the vow) reads "___ will you have this man/woman to be your husband/wife, to live together in the holy estate of marriage? Will you love him/her, comfort him./her, honour him/her her and keep him/her through all the circumstances of life, and forsaking all others keep only her in a lifelong commitment."

 

Now, one can focus solely on "lifelong commitment "or a version that says "until death do you part" but what of love, comfort, honour and cherish?

 

Now, marriage is public... those present and those asking the vows do not intend that love means "beat your ass when I get pissed/drunk/in a mood, etc". They do not intend that comfort means someone will bring someone a cloth for the nose they bloodied, cry about why "you made me do it" or bring flowers after last night's trip to an ER, etc. They did not intend honour to mean dishonouring a person's parents by beating their child, their sibling, their parent... they did not think it meant degrading them or humiliating them.

 

I would wonder whether the question of impediment were answered truthfully. In this couple's case it says "if either of you knows any reason why you should not be married, I charge you now, before God, the Searcher of all hearts, to declare it now. For unless your marriage is based on mutual honesty and trust and love, your marriage will not be sucessfula nd you will not receive the blessing of God."

 

I would say that if a batterer has said those words knowing they are a batterer then they lied before family, friends and God...  and the marriage vows were lies and the marriage is based on a lie.

 

The grounds for annulment usually  include fraud, which includes marrying based on fraudulent statements or actions by the other party.

 

Though it will call out the Catholic bashers, the Catholic Church who weight heavily on the issue of divorce, even does annulments.

 

An annulment says that there was an obstacle right from the beginning that prevented it from being a sacramental marriage. Grounds for annulment can be personality dysfunctions, drug or alcohol addiction, etc.

 

The Reformers, among them Luther, Calvin and Wesley,  allowed room for divorce each with their own interpretation.

 

Luther said grounds for divorce were adultery, desertion, or if a Christian hinders a believing spouse from following Christ. (hmmm can being beaten badly on a Saturday night so bad you cannot make it to church on Sunday apply? How about making someone fall on their knees begging God for help so often they cannot even believe God exists?)  Now, the thing was where people were to be allowed to divorce but had to remain chaste.

 

Calvin and Knox both believed adulterers should be executed (so there was no real need for divorce).

 

Calvin had reasons other than adultery: impotence, extreme religious incompatibility, and abandonment. He also provided for annulment where a spouse could not, because of some physical infirmity, perform the conjugal act.

 

So, if you personally, or anyone you know is allowing separation in cases of abuse, but coming out against divorce....then they are freeing the batterer to divorce the victim who left, but not the victim to be free to divorce the batterer....

 

Hmmm Have we covered no equality ground in the 500 years since Calvin or since the ancient Hebrews?

 

Something to ponder....

lastpointe's picture

lastpointe

image

the point was made up thread

the point was made up thread that a married spouse will be on the hook for debts incured by a spouse, regardless of separation.

 

Perhaps not if legally separated, it might depend on the wording but definately if you are married and just not living together you could be taken to the cleaners.

 

Divorce is not great.  It is hard on everyone, even the person who wants it or needs it to escape.

 

I think there are many who need to divorce sadly there are many who are just serial marryers.

Back to Relationships topics