Balkirk's picture

Balkirk

image

Atheism

 What is Atheism?

Of all the people with different beliefs I don’t get atheists.

I concluded 3 possible reasons for atheism.

1.Lack of emotional intelligence

2.Desire to have no Accountability

3.Objectors of faith

 

Constantly they object to faith of any kind. I wonder if it is simple, as they have no other purpose in life. How many times have you a seen an Atheist volunteer? Are they counter productive to the human race? I’m almost certain they are.

I’m just a simple man wanting a simple answer.

Share this

Comments

Witch's picture

Witch

image

Well you are a simple person

Well you are a simple person indeed, to have fallen for the ridiculous propaganda and empty religious rhetoric laid out in your three fallacies.

 

Here's some advice. Before making more aof a fool of yourself, and committing more false witness... how about you get yourself a dictionary, and look up the word "Atheist"?

dredaman's picture

dredaman

image

Well Simple man... It seems

Well Simple man... It seems as though you are not only arrogant but also misinformed and ignornant.

a) Your comment of lack of emotional intelligence makes me laugh. Like we athiests are the ones who lack intelligence. When you religious people have absolutley no proof of what you believe other then you believe it. I feel that because i am not shackled in life by religion that mind is more open to intelligent thought rather then controlled by ideals taught to you through the power of religion so that you may be controlled like sheep.

b) As for saying we want no accountability... You are also wrong.... again... big suprise. I am accountable for every action I take. See unlike you, I have nobody to blame but myself. Unlike people of religion who will say "god works in mysterious ways" or "It was gods will". Religious people take no accountability.

C) Now as far as objectors of faith... You are 100 percent correct for the first time. Objecting to faith is absolutley beautiful to be able to do. You should try it sometime. Instead of living my life for a god I cant see, touch, or talk to(and dont say, "well you can talk to god whenever you want through prayer". Its bullshit, your talking to yourself), I live my life for my friends, family, and fellow man. (and dont say, "well you can talk to god whenever you want through prayer". Its bullshit, your talking to yourself)

The bottom line is that with me looking out for my fellow man more then an invisible god, how can I be counter productive to society. I volunteer all the time, not because god tells me to but because I have the ability to help somebody other then myself. My morals are intact. I hold the door open for elderly or women all the time, I help people who are in need even when I myself cannot afford to but do anyways. So I'll end this comment the best way I know how to. Open your eyes, stop being and ignorant asshole and realize that it is religion that is counter-productive to a healthy society not the lack of it.

 

Sebb's picture

Sebb

image

First, I can only assume that

First, I can only assume that you are a troll, but, I'm going to feed you anyway.

 

I am an athiest. I was a Christian as a child, but I'm not anymore, if it makes sence to you then live your life that way and enjoy the gifts of your god, or don't, I don't really care either way. I also tried Buddhism for a while. Again, it didn't work out for me but I learned quite a bit about myself and what I want from life, so it was a great experience and I shall continue to explore it as I grow older.

I am an athiest because I don't think that there is a god. I do not hate those who believe otherwise.

My lack of a god or gods to work for does not mean that I "lack emotional intelligence" or that I "desire to have no accountability". I don't object to the faith of others, although I question it, so I can understand it (but when I have questioned others on their faith, the goal has always been for understanding, rather than to "convert" them).

I have friends of many faiths, including other athiests, and we ALL do volunteer work (actually, many of the athiests I know do MORE volunteer work than some of my Christian friends).

 

In my opinion, the only people who are "counter productive to the human race" are those who hate, discriminate, or are ignorant to different groups of people. You, Balkirk, fall into this counterproductive group of the small minded.

 

 

BUT! You are a simple man, who wants a simple answer, so here it is.

 

a·the·ist (th-st)

n.
One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods.
 
 
See? It's really just that simple! (I recomend getting a dictionary or using http://www.thefreedictionary.com if there are more words that you need clarification on.)
revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hello Balkirk and welcome to

Hello Balkirk and welcome to WonderCafe.

 

Balkirk wrote:

What is Atheism?

 

Theism is the belief in God or Gods.  The prefix "a" indicates a non belief in God or Gods.  It is really that simple.

 

Balkirk wrote:

Of all the people with different beliefs I don’t get atheists.

 

So what?

 

Balkirk wrote:

I concluded 3 possible reasons for atheism.

1.Lack of emotional intelligence

2.Desire to have no Accountability

3.Objectors of faith

 

Those conclusions following immediately your admission that "you do not get atheists" do not indicate a willingness to discuss so much as a willingness to insult.

 

balkirk wrote:

I’m just a simple man wanting a simple answer.

 

Having started lobbing insults serving up ammunition to those who may have been offended is pretty gracious of you.

 

You, in this thread, give every indication of being simple.  I don't know if you want a simple answer, any dictionary would have given it to you, it appears that you want an easy answer so that your simplicity is not threatened.

 

If you truly wish to have a discussion you might want to alter your tactics.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

RitaTG's picture

RitaTG

image

Hello Balkirk.... ...... a

Hello Balkirk....

...... a simple man wanting simple answers .....

There you go sweetie ..... a white crayon and a black crayon ......simple.

Please make sure you colour inside the lines......

I am a very devout passionate christian from a conservative evangelical background.

I have athiest friends here who constantly challenge my beliefs and I theirs.    We have enriched each others lives.   They are very warm loving caring moral and ethical people.   Yes we have an athiest jerk show up once in a while but sadly far more often we seem to get the "christain" jerk showing up.     This is far different than those with the various viewpoints that will respect each other and sit and dialogue.

I sincerely hope that this initial post was just a faux pas on your part as I stand up for my friends even if their viewpoint is different than mine.

Rita

joejack2's picture

joejack2

image

Ohhhhh, watch out, Balkirk,

Ohhhhh, watch out, Balkirk, if you oppose atheism on a United Church sponsored website, you'll get called all sorts of things.  As you have already witnessed, you've been called a troll and a few other things.  You might also be accused of being a sock puppet, a fundamentalist or, even worse, a member of the Conservative Party.  (The United Church, of course, being the NDP with religious overtones.)  Are you an atheist toward atheism. Don't you believe in the god of your own belly button or ego?  "Discussion" in the WC context often means you listen to someone else's mindless drivel but if you go against the grain, you're obviously a simple person.  Otherwise, you'll be banned from WC and cast into outer light, and branded with a permanent label. 

blackbelt's picture

blackbelt

image

joejack2 wrote: Ohhhhh, watch

joejack2 wrote:

Ohhhhh, watch out, Balkirk, if you oppose atheism on a United Church sponsored website, you'll get called all sorts of things. 

its not what he opposes but how

RitaTG's picture

RitaTG

image

joejack ...my goodness.....

joejack ...my goodness..... have you had enough coffee this morning?

I do hope you are feeling better soon...

Hugs

Rita

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

Hi Balkirk:   There are many

Hi Balkirk:

 

There are many kinds of atheists, some of whom are "spiritual" or even "religious." The Far East has several atheistic or non-theistic religions. If belief in a separate, supernatural, interventionist God is the only possible form of theism, then I'm a Christian atheist.

 

Some atheists, though, are rabidly anti-theistic. But some believers in God are as rabidly anti-atheistic.

Witch's picture

Witch

image

joejack2 wrote: Ohhhhh, watch

joejack2 wrote:

Ohhhhh, watch out, Balkirk, if you oppose atheism on a United Church sponsored website, you'll get called all sorts of things.  As you have already witnessed, you've been called a troll and a few other things.  You might also be accused of being a sock puppet, a fundamentalist or, even worse, a member of the Conservative Party.  (The United Church, of course, being the NDP with religious overtones.)  Are you an atheist toward atheism. Don't you believe in the god of your own belly button or ego?  "Discussion" in the WC context often means you listen to someone else's mindless drivel but if you go against the grain, you're obviously a simple person.  Otherwise, you'll be banned from WC and cast into outer light, and branded with a permanent label. 

 

Balkirk, meet joejack... joejack, meet Balkirk. You two should get along famously as you're two peas in a trollpod

Balkirk's picture

Balkirk

image

 Oops..How was I suppose know

 Oops..How was I suppose know that a UNITED CHURCH website had Atheists.(weird).

I would have been more delicate in my approach(used smaller words,phonetically speaking of course) and researched our member list. After reading some of the posts Atheists reply in ..they are often the ones that resort to insults, name calling..etc. So I feel justified in my 3 points. I could copy and paste the replies but that seems so redundant.I learned that if you want an answer check the dictionary don't oppose the Atheists..they are ANGREEE.

Hey JoeJack...Witch, odd, you believe in stews and goos and witch's brew but not God. That's messed up.

Witch's picture

Witch

image

Balkirk wrote:  Oops..How was

Balkirk wrote:

 Oops..How was I suppose know that a UNITED CHURCH website had Atheists.(weird).

I would have been more delicate in my approach(used smaller words,phonetically speaking of course) and researched our member list. After reading some of the posts Atheists reply in ..they are often the ones that resort to insults, name calling..etc. So I feel justified in my 3 points. I could copy and paste the replies but that seems so redundant.I learned that if you want an answer check the dictionary don't oppose the Atheists..they are ANGREEE.

Hey JoeJack...Witch, odd, you believe in stews and goos and witch's brew but not God. That's messed up.

 

Yes there are a few loud, obnoxious atheists, just as there are loud, obnoxious Christian... apparently.

 

Does the chip on your shouldder validate your prejudices? Apparently it does to you. Jesus must be so proud of you.

 

FYI, I do believe in God. I guess that just goes to show the danger of spouting off your empty religious rhetoric and your pious bigotry before you bother to actually educate yourself.

 

But that's OK, the true Christians on this site have had lots of experience dealing with self-important pharisaic preacher wannabees like you before. You'll be forgotten soon enough.

GRR's picture

GRR

image

Balkirk wrote:  Oops..How was

Balkirk wrote:

 Oops..How was I suppose know that a UNITED CHURCH website had Atheists.(weird).

lol - balkirk, you'll love beshpin and Geo, and get along famously with ac and jae.

bkirk wrote:

After reading some of the posts Atheists reply in ..they are often the ones that resort to insults, name calling..etc.

That would be unlike the insulting and dismissive statements you're using right?  Because you, unlike they, are "justified" in what you say.

 

Too funny.

Welcome to the cafe. we were running out of holier-than-thou types. JJ doesn't really count, he's more the "I'm mad at the world" type.

 

David

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi Balkirk,   Balkirk

Hi Balkirk,

 

Balkirk wrote:

Oops..How was I suppose know that a UNITED CHURCH website had Atheists.(weird).

 

Since the website invites any and all into open-minded discussion it shouldn't be weird at all.  If it was a private place where we zealously guarded the gate to make sure only the acceptable were allowed in and we designated atheists as unacceptable it might be just the place to come in and trash folk so long as they were the kind of folk all the acceptable people disagreed with.

 

Fortunately WonderCafe is not such a place.

 

Atheists are welcome here, as are you.

 

Of course how you and others comport yourself will dictate how welcome you will be.

 

Balkirk wrote:

I would have been more delicate in my approach(used smaller words,phonetically speaking of course) and researched our member list.

 

Using smaller words is not a requirement for delicacy.  Nothing in your initial post seems to be difficult to understand.  Your presentation is unappealing.

 

Balkirk wrote:

After reading some of the posts Atheists reply in ..they are often the ones that resort to insults, name calling..etc. So I feel justified in my 3 points.

 

Self-justification is satisfying only to the self.

 

Balkirk wrote:

I learned that if you want an answer check the dictionary don't oppose the Atheists..they are ANGREEE.

 

The reference to the dictionary was in response to your not understanding what atheism is about.  The dictionary definition explains what atheism is about.  It may not answer all of your questions.  It at the very least gives you something to work with when you get around to asking questions.  If you just want to dump on people who believe differently then you then don't pretend that you are interested in conversation.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

Olivet_Sarah's picture

Olivet_Sarah

image

I think I can speak from my

I think I can speak from my own experience to at least address the accusation that Wondercafe is defensive of atheism while accusing more conservative/fundamentalist Christian posters of trollism/etc. I don't find this to be the case. Prejudice here is not based on the rejection of fundamentalism by a message board run by a progressive Christian institution, while atheism is acceptable, so much as the rejection of either point of view being shared in a disruptive or insulting way, or in a way indicative of really not being interested in discussing and finding answers, even if that's what's ostensibly being asked for. I have seen both fundamentalist and atheist trolls, sockpuppets, thread hijackers ... and I have seen all get put in their place.

Balkirk's picture

Balkirk

image

Rev John/Witch. Just for a

Rev John/Witch. Just for a moment think of the people who visit this site in search of God talk. People appealing to religious belief and acceptance. Who's defending these people?The people who want to reply but, are afraid to, because of Atheists who articulate there view so intellectually can expunge their frail beliefs. As I struggle with faith and holier than thou persona. I question the views of Atheists who attack the weak who lie invisible and more insecure in their existence.It bothers me a great deal that God has touched me and for some reason hasn't touched or convinced an Atheist(another human being) that he exists. What I seen or witnessed I cannot prove, but out of fear I lay apprehensive to discuss it.Rev John you proved my theory that, a Christian cannot question the conviction of an  Atheist but, they are entitled to berate a fellow Christian. If needed I'll paste where an Atheist resorts to anger and name calling to prove his/her point.

 

GordW's picture

GordW

image

Balkirkj You are missing the

Balkirkj

You are missing the point.  It is perfectly acceptable to raise questions about why a person does/does not believe.  In fact I think that is vital for conversation.  BUt your opening post and susequent posts claimed to be raising questions but did so in an insulting manner.

 

It is the tone, not the concept

Olivet_Sarah's picture

Olivet_Sarah

image

Balkirk wrote: Rev

Balkirk wrote:

Rev John/Witch. Just for a moment think of the people who visit this site in search of God talk. People appealing to religious belief and acceptance. Who's defending these people?The people who want to reply but, are afraid to, because of Atheists who articulate there view so intellectually can expunge their frail beliefs. As I struggle with faith and holier than thou persona. I question the views of Atheists who attack the weak who lie invisible and more insecure in their existence.

I think this is probably the best attempt you've made, Balkirk, to actually see both sides of this issue. Because this used to bother me too - and it still does, if and when Atheists express their beliefs in the (ironically) holier-than-thou way that implies I am somehow 'less than' for believing in something beyond the physical world. I have definitely experienced implications of weakness, stupidity, etc. However, I think you also hit on something important when you speak of the frailty of the beliefs we must hold if they would fold at the first sight of challenged. And this goes for both sides - I have felt this of very militant Christians who obviously feel threatened by anyone who differs from their view of the Holy, and I have wondered what other possible motivation there could be for Atheists whose goal seems to be to convert all those of faith (what's the threat if *I* believe, so long as I'm not making you do the same, or vice versa?)

 

And I think that's around where condescension, attempts at proseletyzing (sp?) from either side stopped bothering me, and where I've in fact started tuning out the insults and welcoming honest debate; if my worldview can't withstand questioning and scrutiny, if I truly feel threatened by those who feel differently from me, then it isn't much of a worldview. And on that score, that's where I would come in pursuing conversation more along the vein you just put forward, than your sort of one-sided generalization you opened this thread with. Because it is not a difference of beliefs I abhor; it is fundamentalist, black-white thinking of any variety, and the choice of rhetoric over debate. Your first post exemplified those things; your latter exemplified more in line with what I would imagine WonderCafe strives to be.

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi Balkirk,   Balkirk

Hi Balkirk,

 

Balkirk wrote:

Rev John/Witch. Just for a moment think of the people who visit this site in search of God talk.

 

I've been thinking it since WonderCafe opened up.

 

Balkirk wrote:

People appealing to religious belief and acceptance. Who's defending these people?

 

Take a look around Balkirk.

 

Balkirk wrote:

The people who want to reply but, are afraid to, because of Atheists who articulate there view so intellectually can expunge their frail beliefs.

 

Who are these people who want to reply but are afraid to?  How is it that they came to you to be their spokesperson?

 

Balkirk wrote:

It bothers me a great deal that God has touched me and for some reason hasn't touched or convinced an Atheist(another human being) that he exists.

 

And out of that bother you have decided to do what?  Engage seeking understanding or ridicule?

 

Balkirk wrote:

What I seen or witnessed I cannot prove, but out of fear I lay apprehensive to discuss it.

 

You are responsible for your own fear.

 

Balkirk wrote:

Rev John you proved my theory that, a Christian cannot question the conviction of an  Atheist but, they are entitled to berate a fellow Christian.

 

Which is an easy claim that is hard to prove.

 

Shall I claim that you have proven several of my theories?

 

Questioning the conviction is allowable.  Questioning the character is out of bounds.  That rule applies both ways.

 

Balkirk wrote:

If needed I'll paste where an Atheist resorts to anger and name calling to prove his/her point.

 

Which proves what exactly Balkirk?  That Christians are justified in resorting to anger or name calling because Atheists do it?  The Christian should hold Christ as their standard should they not?

 

I'm aware that there are times when Atheists here cross the line between attacking belief and attack character instead.  When that happens we have atheists here who are quick to correct them.  And even if that never happened how would that make you right to attack the character of an atheist?

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

GRR's picture

GRR

image

Balkirk wrote:  If needed

Balkirk wrote:

 If needed I'll paste where an Atheist resorts to anger and name calling to prove his/her point.

 

No doubt you'll post an equal number of posts where literal theists do the same?

Or are you already engaged in the willful blindness that afflicts so many like yourself who just want to prove their point?

 

Why not drop the axe you're trying to grind, since the point will never be made anyway, and take a chance on engaging in the wide range of conversation that goes on around here?

 

I'm quite sure you're capable of a worthwhile contribution to the community, but so far you're not demonstrating it in any way.

 

Remember the first rule of holes? Stop digging.

 

Unless of course, that's all you want.

Your choice friend

 

GRR's picture

GRR

image

Balkirk wrote:  As I struggle

Balkirk wrote:

 As I struggle with faith and holier than thou persona.

Unfortunately, and perhaps unintentionally, your OP came off as very much "holier-than-thou.

 

On the other hand, as Sarah alluded to, this is a good place to come to struggle with faith. It can be messy, but it can also be illuminating.

 

Maybe you should press the reset button and give it another try.

David

chansen's picture

chansen

image

Balkirk wrote: Rev

Balkirk wrote:

Rev John/Witch. Just for a moment think of the people who visit this site in search of God talk. People appealing to religious belief and acceptance. Who's defending these people?The people who want to reply but, are afraid to, because of Atheists who articulate there view so intellectually can expunge their frail beliefs.

Stop it.  I'm blushing.

 

If beliefs are frail...that's not terribly surprising.  Faith is belief without the benefit of evidence as a foundation, so it will often be fragile.  If the questions or comments of an atheist are enough to shake faith, then so be it.  As an anti-theist, I take a rather dim view of holding beliefs for no reason except an old book says so.  Others will disagree, and that's fine.

 

 

Balkirk wrote:
As I struggle with faith and holier than thou persona.

I don't think you're struggling at all.  I think you've fully harnessed your "holier than thou persona".

 

 

Balkirk wrote:
I question the views of Atheists who attack the weak who lie invisible and more insecure in their existence.It bothers me a great deal that God has touched me and for some reason hasn't touched or convinced an Atheist(another human being) that he exists. What I seen or witnessed I cannot prove, but out of fear I lay apprehensive to discuss it.Rev John you proved my theory that, a Christian cannot question the conviction of an  Atheist but, they are entitled to berate a fellow Christian. If needed I'll paste where an Atheist resorts to anger and name calling to prove his/her point.

OK, so you've experienced "God".  Did "He" tell you todo good things for others?  To be a nice person and give generously?  Great!  Go ye forth and make a difference.

 

If, on the other hand, "God" told you that same-sex marriage is wrong and we should be denying rights to others, then I and some others are going to have to question your motives.  If (and this is timely) "God" told you that you'll be healed if you only have enough faith, we'll likely question your sanity first, and then we'll openly consider how much of a danger you are to the impressionable in society.

 

Some beliefs are just funny (see Jae, Riverman), and yeah, some of us will have fun with them. Others are freakin' scary and evil and dangerous, and I believe they should be treated as such.  If you want a nice, comfortable place to practice biblically-based bigotry, there are other places on the web where your sensitivities toward the attitudes and lifestyles of the 1950's won't be so severely tested.

Sebb's picture

Sebb

image

If you or any other Christian

If you or any other Christian has weak faith, then perhaps they should speak with the leader of their church for guidance.

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

GoldenRule wrote: Balkirk

GoldenRule wrote:

Balkirk wrote:

 As I struggle with faith and holier than thou persona.

Unfortunately, and perhaps unintentionally, your OP came off as very much "holier-than-thou.

 

On the other hand, as Sarah alluded to, this is a good place to come to struggle with faith. It can be messy, but it can also be illuminating.

 

Maybe you should press the reset button and give it another try.

David

Hi- David this is your best post on this thread and I will agree with you .Have a good day --airclean33

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

Hi-Balkiek- Welcome to

Hi-Balkiek- Welcome to Wondercafe- I hope you put on all your armour if you talk as you have you will need it. God Bless---airclean33

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

Good morning

Good morning Chansen------Chansen Wrote-If beliefs are frail...that's not terribly surprising.  Faith is belief without the benefit of evidence as a foundation, so it will often be fragile.  If the questions or comments of an atheist are enough to shake faith, then so be it.  As an anti-theist, I take a rather dim view of holding beliefs for no reason except an old book says so.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Man learns from OLD BOOKS chansen an you know it,If you believe there is no God . Thats a belief, --( Can you prov it ?)

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

Sebb wrote: If you or any

Sebb wrote:

If you or any other Christian has weak faith, then perhaps they should speak with the leader of their church for guidance.

Hi- Sebb- We Christians do talk to The Leader of are church. His name is Jesus, and He is with us always. But thank you for your post . It may make Brothers think. Have a great day . airclean33

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

Sebb wrote: If you or any

Sebb wrote:

If you or any other Christian has weak faith, then perhaps they should speak with the leader of their church for guidance.

Hi- Sebb- We Christians do talk to The Leader of are church. His name is Jesus, and He is with us always. But thank you for your post . It may make Brothers think. Have a great day . airclean33

joejack2's picture

joejack2

image

ATHEIST:  Someone who

ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything.  What are the odds??????????

abpenny's picture

abpenny

image

As requested, I'll keep my

As requested, I'll keep my answers simple.  

 

1.   If you really are interested in why atheists do not believe in a Supreme Being....ask them.  Telling them your 3 conclusions isn't a great start, but maybe they'll overlook it.

 

2.  Yes, I've seen many atheists as volunteers.

 

3.  No, they are not counter productive to the human race. 

 

4.  You're almost certain??  I don't think you've even asked yet, so save this conclusion for later. 

 

 

Sebb's picture

Sebb

image

airclean33 wrote: Sebb

airclean33 wrote:

Sebb wrote:

If you or any other Christian has weak faith, then perhaps they should speak with the leader of their church for guidance.

Hi- Sebb- We Christians do talk to The Leader of are church. His name is Jesus, and He is with us always. But thank you for your post . It may make Brothers think. Have a great day . airclean33

 

I think you may have misunderstood what I meant. I meen talk with a priest or what ever the right word may be as he could probably give advice on how to deal with such feelings or ideas, and help to reestablish the persons faith.

 

I hope you have a very nice day, Airclean33 : )

Witch's picture

Witch

image

joejack2 wrote: ATHEIST: 

joejack2 wrote:

ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything.  What are the odds??????????

 

Sounds like you also need to find a good dictionary.

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

Hi- Sebb- You know I like the

Hi- Sebb- You know I like the way you think, and yes I agree with you. It would help thats one of the reasons these ,women and men are there. God Bless Sebb. airclean33

blackbelt's picture

blackbelt

image

joejack2 wrote: ATHEIST: 

joejack2 wrote:

ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything.  What are the odds??????????

zero

Witch's picture

Witch

image

blackbelt wrote: joejack2

blackbelt wrote:

joejack2 wrote:

ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything.  What are the odds??????????

zero

 

Yes the odds are zero that that is what an Atheist believes.

Witch's picture

Witch

image

joejack2 wrote: ATHEIST: 

joejack2 wrote:

ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything.  What are the odds??????????

 

Isn't false witness supposed to be a sin?

chansen's picture

chansen

image

I can think of no better

I can think of no better argument for atheism, than having AC33, blackbelt and joejack against it.  If they want to froth at the mouth and represent the Christian viewpoint by rallying around "ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything", then I couldn't be happier.  I'm only surprised we don't get more Christians distancing themselves and their beliefs from these three.

 

Simply put, if this is the best argument and the best people WonderCafe has to offer on this debate, then I'm pretty much shooting fish in a barrel.

blackbelt's picture

blackbelt

image

Witch wrote: blackbelt

Witch wrote:

blackbelt wrote:

joejack2 wrote:

ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything.  What are the odds??????????

zero

 

Yes the odds are zero that that is what an Atheist believes.

agreed, thats why it comes down to choice in  faith

blackbelt's picture

blackbelt

image

chansen wrote: I can think of

chansen wrote:

I can think of no better argument for atheism, than having AC33, blackbelt and joejack against it.  If they want to froth at the mouth

 

 

the only time i froth at the mouth is when im having a cold beer

 

 

chansen's picture

chansen

image

Beer references aside, you

Beer references aside, you come across like a dumbass.  Joejack and AC33 are even worse.  If you want to debate atheism, go find Siege and bring him back here.  I don't exactly want him on my side of these discussions, but having you three on the other side makes my job too easy to take seriously, and too boring stay interested.

blackbelt's picture

blackbelt

image

chansen wrote: Beer

chansen wrote:

Beer references aside, you come across like a dumbass.  Joejack and AC33 are even worse.

maybe , but your an asshole, go watch Dr William Lane Craig hes debated the best of your kind

Sebb's picture

Sebb

image

airclean33 wrote: Hi- Sebb-

airclean33 wrote:

Hi- Sebb- You know I like the way you think, and yes I agree with you. It would help thats one of the reasons these ,women and men are there. God Bless Sebb. airclean33

 

I'm not sure how much it would mean coming from me, but, God bless :)

joejack2's picture

joejack2

image

chansen wrote: Beer

chansen wrote:

Beer references aside, you come across like a dumbass.  Joejack and AC33 are even worse.  If you want to debate atheism, go find Siege and bring him back here.  I don't exactly want him on my side of these discussions, but having you three on the other side makes my job too easy to take seriously, and too boring stay interested.

The Chansen Quintet rides again.

Actually, I don't take you seriously.  If you didn't act like a complete idiot, you'd be boring and have no personality at all.  Debate atheism, you say?  You don't have a prayer.

joejack2's picture

joejack2

image

chansen wrote: I can think of

chansen wrote:

I can think of no better argument for atheism, than having AC33, blackbelt and joejack against it.  If they want to froth at the mouth and represent the Christian viewpoint by rallying around "ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything", then I couldn't be happier.  I'm only surprised we don't get more Christians distancing themselves and their beliefs from these three.

 

Simply put, if this is the best argument and the best people WonderCafe has to offer on this debate, then I'm pretty much shooting fish in a barrel.

Wazza Matta Chansen, Cantcha Takea Joke?  You can sure dish it out.  Somebody get Chansen a towel.  Tears may short circuit his keyboard.   Poor Baby.

chansen's picture

chansen

image

Dr. Craig is an excellent

Dr. Craig is an excellent debater and posesses an internal encyclopedia of information and arguments.  You are not William Lane Craig.

 

Rather than tell me to watch him, go watch him yourself.  See if he has come up with anything so masterful in the defense of "God" as you have.  The international debate circuit awaits your awesome abilities.

blackbelt's picture

blackbelt

image

joejack2 wrote: chansen

joejack2 wrote:

chansen wrote:

Beer references aside, you come across like a dumbass.  Joejack and AC33 are even worse.  If you want to debate atheism, go find Siege and bring him back here.  I don't exactly want him on my side of these discussions, but having you three on the other side makes my job too easy to take seriously, and too boring stay interested.

 

 You don't have a prayer.

hahahahahahahahah,,,,, I agree, literally agree!!!!!!!!

he only has rude comments

Witch's picture

Witch

image

chansen wrote: The

chansen wrote:

The international debate circuit awaits your awesome abilities.

... with baited breath, no less.

chansen's picture

chansen

image

joejack2 wrote: chansen

joejack2 wrote:

chansen wrote:

I can think of no better argument for atheism, than having AC33, blackbelt and joejack against it.  If they want to froth at the mouth and represent the Christian viewpoint by rallying around "ATHEIST:  Someone who believes that nothing made everything", then I couldn't be happier.  I'm only surprised we don't get more Christians distancing themselves and their beliefs from these three.

 

Simply put, if this is the best argument and the best people WonderCafe has to offer on this debate, then I'm pretty much shooting fish in a barrel.

Wazza Matta Chansen, Cantcha Takea Joke?  You can sure dish it out.  Somebody get Chansen a towel.  Tears may short circuit his keyboard.   Poor Baby.

Just think - to a new visitor here, you might be their first impression of what a Christian on WC is like.  Do you really think you come across as intelligent, likeable, or "Christ-like"?  Do you think you are doing your faith any favours?

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

Hi- chansen- I will not

Hi- chansen- I will not attack you.For some reason I sort of like you.although you have attacked me one or twise. Besides I think B_B or Joejack would be away more than you would want to deal with.Now you have a nice Day chansen . airclean33

Balkirk's picture

Balkirk

image

 Of all the people with

 Of all the people with different beliefs I don’t get atheists.

I concluded 3 possible reasons for atheism.

1.Lack of emotional intelligence

2.Desire to have no Accountability

3.Objectors of faith

I'll be the first to admit I was wrong. My apologies to all. It's none of the 3 conclusions. After reading Chansen's idiotorial,  from the suffering comes enlightenment. 

Persons who can't understand or fathom the existence of our Father is simple, THEY ARE NOT READY. Basically if they witnessed or evened momentarily thought God existed their minds would implode. Everything they thought logical would be illogical. Their minds are necessary for the jobs or purpose in their lives. A person could easily challenge the conviction of an Atheist, I guarantee they would lie to themselves and others if they had proof...because they, their existence relies on the logical thinking that propels them to complete their journey. 

Back to Religion and Faith topics