I have been a longterm member of the United Church of Canada (1965) and have served it at many levels. My first encounter with the willingness of the Church to change was in 1965 when the denomination replaced the W. C. Cook Sunday School material with the New Curriculum.
(http://www.united-church.ca/history/overview/timeline)
The next really big change took place in 1988 when General Council voted to:
Since that time a movement has started to become an affirming congregation/church.
The way I understand it, to be an affirming congregation/church means to be a congregation/church which will not deny homo sexuals any rights as members of that congregation/church.
What bothers me is that to be an affirming church has come to mean that all our actions and intend are focussed on Homo Sexual members and their rights to marry and etc. By adopting that position we clearly demonstrate an exclusivist position. How so? Well, consider the wording of the invitation to the Eucharist. As far as I know, anybody is welcome to the table if they confess Jesus as Lord and Master/Saviour. My position is that this wording should be changed to reflect the absolute inclusiveness of those invited. i.e. When pronouncing the invitation, it should be made clear that "All who hunger SHALL BE FED"! No exceptions. Or should there be?
Your comments please!
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada
Comments
crazyheart
In the affirming process that
Posted on: 11/23/2008 09:35
In the affirming process that I have been a part of, it has not only focused on Gay and Lesbian etc but also the other isms - age; race; physically challenged etc. but it the Homosexual question that seems to get the most play.
Arminius
Hi Panentheist: There
Posted on: 11/23/2008 10:54
Hi Panentheist:
There should be no exceptions. Jesus welcomed everyone unconditionally, and so should we.
Panentheist
Not that I can remember, but
Posted on: 11/23/2008 10:56
Not that I can remember, but then again, sometimes my mind plays tricks on me.
Is anybody doing anything about that?
If so, what?
Looking for suggestions!
RichardBott
The Basis of Union reads,
Posted on: 11/23/2008 11:45
The Basis of Union reads, "All may be admitted to the Lord’s Supper who make a credible profession of their faith in the Lord Jesus and of obedience to His law."
The invitation that I use goes something like, "The table we gather at now is not mine. Its not St. Andrew's. Its not even The United Church's. This table is Christ's.
Jesus of Nazareth invited everyone to his table - poor and rich, young and old, people who believed in what he had to say, and people who didn't, searchers and people-who-were-sure-they-knew-it. He invited everyone.
Christ invites everyone.
He invites you if you're gay or if you're straight. He invites you if you're 9 days or 999 years old. He invites you if your ancestors were born here or in any other part of the world.
As seeker, as searcher, as newcomer or as one who has walked his path for years, he invites you.
In whatever way you believe in him, he invites you to his table.
So - knowing you are invited by Jesus the Christ - come as you desire."
I realize that I could probably be challenged on what is written in the Articles of Faith. It would be interesting to see if my interpretation of those lines could be successfully argued.
But, Panen - I''m still trying to figure out how becoming an Affirming Congregation is exclusivist. I'm really not sure how an open stance on communion and the Affirming process are in opposition... or how they're even connected.
Christ's peace -r
crazyheart
drs wrote:So when you say you
Posted on: 11/24/2008 20:52
So when you say you are part of an affirming church and believe in such things then you are not truly a church of GOD, and to say so means you blaspheme GOD and say the HOLY BIBLE is a lie.
I think you are assuming far too much. You offend me.
drs
what am i assuming?
Posted on: 11/24/2008 21:46
what am i assuming? everything i said is true according to scripture.
Look either we stand in and obey all the truth of GOD in the bible or we don't.
GOD does not comprimise his word and his laws for anyone,
IT is not for us to debate and pick and choose what we should believe about the scripture for as soon as we do that we are lost thinking we know better than GOD.
crazyheart
You know, drs , Jesus showed
Posted on: 11/24/2008 21:53
You know, drs , Jesus showed us what love and compassion means - Love neighbour - and how you can spew such hatred and say you are following God, is beyond me. If anyone is "blaspheme GOD ". it would be you.
drs
If I blaspheme what do these
Posted on: 11/24/2008 22:22
If I blaspheme what do these scriptures mean then?
God’s Wrath on Unrighteousness Romans 1;18-32
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.
24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality,[c] wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving,[d] unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
1 Corinthians 5
Immorality Defiles the Church
1 It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and such sexual immorality as is not even named[a] among the Gentiles—that a man has his father’s wife! 2 And you are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he who has done this deed might be taken away from among you. 3 For I indeed, as absent in body but present in spirit, have already judged (as though I were present) him who has so done this deed. 4 In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when you are gathered together, along with my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, 5 deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.[b]
6 Your glorying is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? 7 Therefore purge out the old leaven, that you may be a new lump, since you truly are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, was sacrificed for us.[c] 8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
Immorality Must Be Judged
9 I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10 Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. 11 But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.
12 For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13 But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”[d]
Glorify God in Body and Spirit
12 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13 Foods for the stomach and the stomach for foods, but God will destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14 And God both raised up the Lord and will also raise us up by His power.
15 Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? Certainly not! 16 Or do you not know that he who is joined to a harlot is one body with her? For “the two,” He says, “shall become one flesh.”[b] 17 But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit with Him.
18 Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. 19 Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? 20 For you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body[c] and in your spirit, which are God’s.
Jesus Testifies to the Churches revaltion 22:12-21
12 “And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.”[f]
14 Blessed are those who do His commandments,[g] that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city. 15 But[h] outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie.
16 “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star.”
17 And the Spirit and the bride say, “Come!” And let him who hears say, “Come!” And let him who thirsts come. Whoever desires, let him take the water of life freely.
A Warning
18 For[i] I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add[j] to him the plagues that are written in this book; 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away[k] his part from the Book[l] of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
I Am Coming Quickly
20 He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming quickly.”
Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus!
21 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all.[m] Amen.
RussP
crazyheart How many hours a
Posted on: 11/25/2008 09:24
crazyheart
How many hours a day do you spend looking for new pictures? Cute!
What drs is saying is that he is a card carrying, dues paying, member of the RC, or similar ! NOT A PROBLEM FOR ME !!! He would no more feel welcomed in a UCC church than I would feel welcomed in his.
We have the literalist versus the modernist.
I am quite sure that drs has not been through a Bible study based on a Sprogian or Borgian viewpoint.
IT
Russ
crazyheart
Hi Russ. Yes, I have
Posted on: 11/25/2008 10:57
Hi Russ. Yes, I have collected avatars since the beginning of Wonder Cafe.
I don't usually get worked up over posters with drs' views but yesterday he irked me. I guess I just hate it when they bash the UCCAN and I guess if we don't stand up for our church and it's affirming stance - no one will.
RussP
crazy Amen to that. What I
Posted on: 11/25/2008 12:37
crazy
Amen to that.
What I find amazing is that, and I am sure someone will get ticked of, the fundie churches seem to be held together by the "perfect" Bible. They all believe in the same idea.
The UCC seems to be just as cohesive, and yet we have so many different colours, which we are more than happy to debate at the drop of a hat. We all disagree, and yet we are all family.
IT
Russ
----------
RichardBott wrote:The Basis
Posted on: 11/25/2008 12:55
The Basis of Union reads, "All may be admitted to the Lord’s Supper who make a credible profession of their faith in the Lord Jesus and of obedience to His law."
As seeker, as searcher, as newcomer or as one who has walked his path for years, he invites you.
Don't these two statements contradict each other? Which is it, RichardBott? Is the Lord's supper for those who have faith in Jesus, or can it include seekers and searchers???
Jesus said we were to partake of it in remembrance of him. Do seekers truly have remembrance of him, a person they have yet to really place their faith in?
Shouldn't the leadership of a church fence in the Lord's table, to ensure that no one comes unworthily?
nighthawk
-jubilee- wrote:Shouldn't the
Posted on: 11/25/2008 12:59
Shouldn't the leadership of a church fence in the Lord's table, to ensure that no one comes unworthily?
And how do you propose we discern the worthy from the unworthy? Should we administer a written or oral test prior to receiving the elements of communion?
But, even if we accept your idea that there are those who come worthily and those who do not, do you really believe that God will have no choice but to confer his presence on anyone who partakes, even those he deems unworthy?
RichardBott
-jubilee- wrote:Shouldn't the
Posted on: 11/25/2008 13:43
Shouldn't the leadership of a church fence in the Lord's table, to ensure that no one comes unworthily?
Hmmm....
How did Paul put it? Oh, right... "All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God."
None of us are any more or less 'worthy' than any other.
Following the logic in your post, none of us should be able to come to Christ's table.
Who did Christ turn away?
Christ's peace - r
crazyheart
RichardBott wrote:-jubilee-
Posted on: 11/25/2008 13:46
Shouldn't the leadership of a church fence in the Lord's table, to ensure that no one comes unworthily?
Hmmm.... How can we be partake in" a meal of new beginnings" if we shun people and tell them they are not worthy?
RichardBott
Hi, Jubilee... Around the
Posted on: 11/25/2008 14:02
Hi, Jubilee...
Around the "credible profession of faith" statement... I'd submit that coming to Christ's table is a profession - or at the very least, a hope - that something more than chowing down on a piece of bread and slurping back some grape juice is happening in that moment.
In our participation in the sacraments, Christ touches the world (and us) in ways we can only begin to imagine. There is powerful and wonder-full transformative change when the Divine and creation interact.
I'm prepared to take the act of participation as an outward sign of some kind of connection with God. (*lol* - Which comes first, the chicken or the egg?)
Christ's peace - r
drs
Right now on youtube there is
Posted on: 11/25/2008 14:46
Right now on youtube there is a 13 part series homosexuality and the bible by John MacArthur.
Russ did you mean Charles Spurgeon? if so you might want to hear this sermon.
I have heard MacArther quote him in other sermons.
Also I am not roman chatholic that is another form of false Christianity.
I would also like to direct anyone who wants to know more to youtube to watch pope and the papacy 9 part series by John MacArthur
drs
russ also it is not about
Posted on: 11/25/2008 15:12
russ also it is not about feeling welcome it is about the truth.
we are to conform to GOD's ways and GOD'S laws not go around building different kinds of churches were people feel they can fit in and are free to express them selfs however they wish.
The church is supposed to be the body of CHRIST and serve the will of GOD according to the truth in the scripture.
----------
RichardBott, Thank you for
Posted on: 11/25/2008 15:21
RichardBott,
Thank you for your answers.
I appreciate your words...
What's your understanding then of the scene in 1 Corinthians 11?
revjohn
Hi Jubilee, -jubilee-
Posted on: 11/25/2008 15:41
Hi Jubilee,
Don't these two statements contradict each other? Which is it, RichardBott? Is the Lord's supper for those who have faith in Jesus, or can it include seekers and searchers???
The two statements do not contradict each other. A credible profession is the profession that the community accepts. My liturgy differs from Richard's but it includes a liturgical profession. We don't say that individually and then participate we say it communally. Those who do not wish to participate do not have to make the profession we assume that all those who do, have.
Jesus said we were to partake of it in remembrance of him. Do seekers truly have remembrance of him, a person they have yet to really place their faith in?
Do you truly partake in remembrance since you were not present at the Last Supper?
I would acknowledge that you remember the tradition of the Last Supper but that is not the same thing as having been present to have an actual memory of.
Shouldn't the leadership of a church fence in the Lord's table, to ensure that no one comes unworthily?
No one who celebrates the sacrament does so because they are worthy of it. No one since Christ instituted it presiding does so because they are worthy. In fact, I would argue that any who come presuming to be worthy profane the sacrament with their ignorance.
The cup is the cup of forgiveness. The covenant ratified by the blood of Christ. It alone makes worthy.
We do not come to the table because we are worthy. We come to the table because by participating we have access to the means of grace and we are made worthy.
The Apostle Paul talks about eating and drinking the cup in an unworthy manner and eating and drinking judgement upon one's self in 1 Corinthians 11. Paul is also very explicit that the problem is not discerning the body, meaning who belongs and who may participate. No where does Paul, in 1 Corinthians 11 suggest the problem he seeks to address was a problem of allowing people to participate but rather it was behaving in such a way so as to prohibit people from participating.
If a fence is to be put into play it can only be put into play to prevent the error that Paul critiques. 1 Corinthians 11: 20-22 highlight Paul's problem and the reason for his warnings in 1 Corinthians 11: 27-34.
For that same reason should a clergy person ever not serve anyone who has come forward the sacrament should be formally ended right there. It is not a tool to punish with. It is the meal of the community.
Grace and peace to you.
John
[/quote]
RussP
drsYou stated (the silly
Posted on: 11/25/2008 16:21
drs
You stated (the silly tables just take too long)
"also it is not about feeling welcome it is about the truth. we are to conform to GOD's ways and GOD'S laws not go around building different kinds of churches were people feel they can fit in and are free to express them selfs however they wish."
Different kinds of churches? So the RC church with the Latin mass or the RC church with the English mass isn't different?
I don' t think that fundamentally "we" disagree on the basis principles, some type of God, that Jesus was/is important, etc., but at the root, we do not agree that the Bible is the "word" of God, inspired yes, but not arriving fully written. I think you would agree with that?
IT
Russ
drs
russ (silly tables just take
Posted on: 11/25/2008 17:36
russ (silly tables just take to long) what does that mean?
next i said RC is a false form of Christianity latin verse english - doctrine and religious practice wrong in whatever lauguage.
also when i said building diiferent kinds of churches it has nothing to do with the actual stucture or architecture of the building itself, but the building and massing together bodies of people that do not hold true to GOD's word written in the bible.
Fundamently some type of GOD JESUS was/is important?
LORD JESUS CHRIST GOD MOST HIGH KING OF THE UNIVERSE SAVIOUR TO ALL THAT WILL TRULY BELIEVE IN HIM
HE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT, HE IS THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE.
old testement most was written by GOD'S profits who he spoke to dirrectly.
new testement the gospels were LORD JESUS words written by his diciples by the HOLY SPIRT
the diciples wrote the other epistles by the HOLY SPIRT
Revelation was given to John by GOD told to write these things down.
LORD JESUS CHRIST testifies to the truth of this scripture and gives a warning.
DO you not think GOD has the power to keep his HOLY BIBLE and have what scriptures he wants in it? ofcourse he does that is why when people deny it they will have no excuse.
Jesus Testifies to the Churches
12 “And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.”[f]
14 Blessed are those who do His commandments,[g] that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city. 15 But[h] outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie.
16 “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star.”
17 And the Spirit and the bride say, “Come!” And let him who hears say, “Come!” And let him who thirsts come. Whoever desires, let him take the water of life freely.
A Warning
18 For[i] I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add[j] to him the plagues that are written in this book; 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away[k] his part from the Book[l] of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
I Am Coming Quickly
20 He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming quickly.”
Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus!
21 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all.[m] Amen.
RussP
drs Sorry, what I meant was
Posted on: 11/25/2008 18:03
drs
Sorry, what I meant was that everyone has figured out how to quote in a nice shaded box, still can't figure out a simple and fast way to do that.
I apologize for the RC thing, as someone stated in another post, these get so long you never read the whole thing.
OK "Do you not think GOD has the power to keep his HOLY BIBLE and have what scriptures he wants in it?" I know I shouldn't, but.....
Why two different counts of animals going onto Noah's Ark.
Why four very different versions of Jesus' crucifixion?
If this is "perfect", why weren't the typos caught?
IT
Russ
drs
Hi Russ could you please be
Posted on: 11/25/2008 18:48
Hi Russ could you please be more specifac regarding these things with scripture refference so i know what to look for. thanx
carolla
dr wrote: "...The church is
Posted on: 11/25/2008 19:00
dr wrote: "...The church is supposed to be the body of CHRIST ..."
Interesting to note that a healthy body is composed of many disparate parts doing different things, each of which is important, if not essential, to maintaining life. A body composed of just one type of cell ... it would be dead.
drs
here you have it , to be
Posted on: 11/25/2008 19:29
here you have it , to be comformed to the image of his Son
romans 8
29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified.
what kind of worldly wisdom is that?
what could be more wonderfull than to be conformed into the image of LORD JESUS CHRIST to love, worship and serve him for all time and beyond.?
RussP
drs Genesis 6:19 - bring two
Posted on: 11/25/2008 19:41
drs
Genesis 6:19 - bring two of every sort
Genesis 7:2-3 - bring seven clean and two unclean
The stories of John, Luke, Paul and Matthew differ as to time.
drs
genisis 6:19 2 of every
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:13
genisis 6:19 2 of every kind to keep the species alive
genisis 7:2-3 animals for sacrifice and food
genisis 8:20
20 Then Noah built an altar to the LORD, and took of every clean animal and of every clean bird, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.
genisis 9:3
3 Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you.
DaisyJane
Pan, Interesting question and
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:24
Pan,
Interesting question and I will be the first to admit that my understanding is simplistic at best.
I attend an affirming congregation and understand that "label" to mean that our church has gone through a process to ensure that our community is a safe place for individuals who are GLBT or questioning. That upon entering our space they have entered a safe place where the community will accept them and the community believes in a God who cherishes them for the unique and wonderful people they are.
In many ways I see the Lord's Supper a bit differently (here comes the simplistic understanding part probably). I understand that not all UCC congregations are affirming. Indeed some are the antithesis. However, I understand that most UCC congregations (if not all) have a much more inclusive interpretation of the Lord's supper....that all who wish to take part are welcome.
I must admit that I love that philosophy....the idea of full inclusion at the table. I love the fact that our church would welcome all who wish to participate and be included in the meal. I love the idea that there is no determination of who is worthy... such as who has taken a class or made a profession. I love the fact that my children (all of whom are pre-confirmation) take part. Now, if y'all would just figure out how to get the little bread chunk into a form that can be administered via feeding tube you will have mastered full inclusion =-).
drs
next they differ as to time
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:22
next they differ as to time of what? sorry i need more specifac scripture references, and times to what?
DaisyJane
drs. I must admit I shake my
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:29
drs.
I must admit I shake my head a bit at these sorts of scripture "wars".
It is utterly impossible to live by the Bible literally without applying interpretation at some point. Your interpretation differs from many UCC members and that is fine. However, your interpretation is not superior nor better nor more accurate nor the truth.
If I were to interpret the Bible literally then my profoundly disabled son would not be welcome in many worship based activities (I would need to go grab my Bible to get the specific quote, but something about "cripples" not being worthy comes to mind). I cannot for the life of me look to a God who would create my beautiful and profoundly disabled son and then limit his acceptance in a faith community or at the Lord's table. However your more literal interpretation would seem to espouse that idea would it not?????
DaisyJane
Sorry, just to add one more
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:36
Sorry, just to add one more thought Pan.
What I have found moving from a UCC church that would probably be considered quite right of centre to a church that is affirming and more left of centre is that the "affirming" sentiment seems to extend beyond the GLBT spectrum. While I understand the affirming piece to largely apply to the GLBTQ community I have found that the community extends full inclusion to all. They way my son was welcomed when we arrived at this new church was overwhelming to the point of reducing me to tears as I type this post.
In our last congregation I felt that specialson was viewed as a bit of enigma...how do we include HIM? Crap, this means we need to figure out where the heck to move the Sunday school class......(allow several years to pass while I simply washed my hands of the chuch)....enter the new, affirming congregation discovered during church shopping some years later......the community embraced specialson. Within months of our arriving a ramp materialized in the one inaccessible place in the church. Specialson was fully included in sunday school. Specialson was the star in last year's Christmas pageant and is a wise man this year.
To me this is an AFFIRMING congregation!!!!!
DaisyJane
Sorry, just to add one more
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:36
Sorry, just to add one more thought Pan.
What I have found moving from a UCC church that would probably be considered quite right of centre to a church that is affirming and more left of centre is that the "affirming" sentiment seems to extend beyond the GLBT spectrum. While I understand the affirming piece to largely apply to the GLBTQ community I have found that the community extends full inclusion to all. They way my son was welcomed when we arrived at this new church was overwhelming to the point of reducing me to tears as I type this post.
In our last congregation I felt that specialson was viewed as a bit of enigma...how do we include HIM? Crap, this means we need to figure out where the heck to move the Sunday school class......(allow several years to pass while I simply washed my hands of the chuch)....enter the new, affirming congregation discovered during church shopping some years later......the community embraced specialson. Within months of our arriving a ramp materialized in the one inaccessible place in the church. Specialson was fully included in sunday school. Specialson was the star in last year's Christmas pageant and is a wise man this year.
To me this is an AFFIRMING congregation!!!!!
DaisyJane
Hmmmm, no idea why that
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:36
Hmmmm, no idea why that posted twice. Sorry!
DaisyJane
Hmmmm, no idea why that
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:36
Hmmmm, no idea why that posted twice. Sorry!
drs
To speacial mom I certanly
Posted on: 11/25/2008 20:52
To speacial mom
I certanly did not say that I have only been quoting scripture.
please sent me your bible sripture quote.
my own opinion is meaningless all that matter's is what GOD has said in scripture
most preachers, people, when interperting scriptue just leave out what they don't like or what is to hard for them believe which is not truly interpertation it is selective reading.
that is not the way it works it is an all or nothing deal.
matthew 4:4
4 But He answered and said, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.’”[
crazyheart
drs,There is no winning or
Posted on: 11/25/2008 21:37
drs,There is no winning or losing when you want quote for quote. Do you have a resource that gives you all the answers to every question in a scripture passage. Is it like a thesaurus? Where do you buy it? All of the fundamental community seem to own one. Do you maybe get it at baptism.?
drs
crazyheartthe resource is the
Posted on: 11/25/2008 22:03
crazyheart
the resource is the bible itself.
most awnsers to peoples questions are there in the scripture but they refuse to accept them.
what do you think this is a fight? winning or losing?, no one can fight with GOD and win so either you will humbly submit to his will or you will rebel believing that you are wise and know better than GOD
here a quote of what GOD has said about worldly wisdom.
1 corinthians 1
Christ the Power and Wisdom of God
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written:
“ I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.”[a]
20 Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
DaisyJane
we could go back to the
Posted on: 11/25/2008 22:04
we could go back to the classic arguments in this case....
drs....
Do you wear mixed fibres? Do you put to death fellow congregants who do not observe the Sabbath? Do you sacrifice animals to atone for sins....splashing the blood against the altar Leviticus commands? Do you eat pork? Did you circumsize your son on day eight of his life? Do you bathe your entire body following "an emission of semen" ? Do you allow the hair on the sides of your head and beard grow as commanded?
I have a hard time believing you live literally by the Bible.
DaisyJane
I would humbly ask that the
Posted on: 11/25/2008 22:06
I would humbly ask that the "literal" conversation be taken elsewhere. Pan's questions about affirming is a good one and I would enjoy reading the conversation about that topic rather than allowing this tangent hijack the thread.
My apologies for playing along though like CH it did irk me.
drs
do you not think the things
Posted on: 11/25/2008 22:26
do you not think the things written in the law were literal? of course they were!
that was the old covenent before LORD JESUS CHRIST gave himself as the attoning sacrifice for sin.
So I live under the new covenent of the blood of LORD JESUS CHRIST that he shed for all that would truly repent forsake sin and believe in him.
Institution of the Lord’s Supper
23 For I received from the Lord that which I also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus on the same night in which He was betrayed took bread; 24 and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “Take, eat;[b] this is My body which is broken[c] for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” 25 In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.”
26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death till He comes.
Examine Yourself
27 Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood[d] of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner[e] eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord’s[f] body. 30 For this reason many are weak and sick among you, and many sleep. 31 For if we would judge ourselves, we would not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are chastened by the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world.
33 Therefore, my brethren, when you come together to eat, wait for one another. 34 But if anyone is hungry, let him eat at home, lest you come together for judgment. And the rest I will set in order when I come.
Footnotes:
crazyheart
Thamk you drs for your input
Posted on: 11/25/2008 22:58
Thamk you drs for your input but like specialmom, I too, would ask that we get back to pan's query about affirming congregations.
RussP
drs Genesis 6: 19 - And of
Posted on: 11/26/2008 09:35
drs
Genesis 6: 19 - And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female
Genesis 7:2 - Of every clean aminal thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and the female
So......
Nowhere in Genesis 7 does it say the animals are for food.
Are you saying that the eating of unclean animals is being suggested by Genesis 7? See Leviticus "And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you." So you are advocating eating pig?
Anyway, a discussion that is going nowhere, knew I shouldn't have started.
specialmom, sorry, shuda noed beter.
IT
Russ
RussP
I think that pan's point is
Posted on: 11/26/2008 09:40
I think that pan's point is well taken, and may be because same gender happened to be the flavour of teh day. So it became the flag around which us UUCers rallied.
Now that this subject has been settled, at least in most minds, we can move on to the broader picture. But I fear, that the train has moved on and the outcry just isn't there.
So how do we raise the profile? Exactly what are trying to do? Who have we excluded?
IT
Russ
crazyheart
I think that one of the
Posted on: 11/26/2008 15:12
I think that one of the groups that we have excluded are the elderly. We hear over and over how they are not with the program; they don't do any thing; they just come for an hour on Sunday. i think we are forgetting they were the workers in the church and it is some of their money that is keeping a lot of doors open.
RussP
crazy Perhaps we are lucky as
Posted on: 11/26/2008 15:21
crazy
Perhaps we are lucky as we seem to have quite an active older group where I attend. Exercise class, art, all that good stuff.
Hmmmmm
Loss for words. I'll get back.
IT
Russ
weeze
"Now that the subject has
Posted on: 11/26/2008 15:56
"Now that the subject has been settled, we can move on to broader things...."
Russ, I agree entirely--for many years now there's been so much emphasis on the GLBT thing and our congregations have come a long, long way--but that is only one of the challenges we're dealing with now, and it's 'way down on the list, for two reasons, I think, in the context I live in: 1, any persons who want to come to our church are welcome, and we don't need to make a declaration about a specific group, if there are gay persons in our midst we know it, we know them, and they're already welcome if they want to be here. 2. If they don't want to be here (if they're the same as most of the secular public out there,) they don't give a damn whether we welcome them or not. If they're looking for a fight about it, they'll be disappointed when they come, because we won't make any fuss at all. Our congregations have been through a long time struggling with this and it's pretty much accepted now and we have many many other changes to adapt to and challenges to meet.
RussP
weeze We had a science versus
Posted on: 11/26/2008 16:05
weeze
We had a science versus theology discussion last Wednesday and I think we were all amazed that while the understanding of the Bible was all over the place, we seemed to get along just fine. I think UCCers are a different breed. Perhaps we come across as wishy washy. I don't think that is the case. I think we are more accepting, willing to look beyond the obvious and as you say, welcoming Don't expect a fight here, BUT, you can expect a friendly debate, a cup of coffee, and of course FOOD, always food!
IT
Russ
Panentheist
[quote = RussP]We had a
Posted on: 12/01/2008 00:40
[quote = RussP]
We had a science versus theology discussion last Wednesday and I think we were all amazed that while the understanding of the Bible was all over the place, we seemed to get along just fine. I think UCCers are a different breed. Perhaps we come across as wishy washy. I don't think that is the case. I think we are more accepting, willing to look beyond the obvious and as you say, welcoming Don't expect a fight here, BUT, you can expect a friendly debate, a cup of coffee, and of course FOOD, always food!
[/ quote]
RussP, next time you have communion, listen very carefully to the words of invitation. I usually end up in a debate about the invitation which insists that this is an "Open" table where anybody who accepts Jesus as his/her Lord and Savior is welcome. Apart from the fact that the language used is clearly excluding, what would happen if you escorted a Muslim or a Buddhist to the table? Would either of them be welcome?
Well, are there any other examples we can think of? The annual general meeting is close at hand. Interesting times!
At a response above it was said that everybody was being made to feel SAFE. Check the credentials of the members and see if they are in agreement that Jesus is NOT God. We may not kill them on the spot if they don't, but will they bemade to feel "SAFE"?
Finally, if we are to accept RussP's position of tolerance, then it would follow that we are no longer Trinitarians, but Panentheists (which I have become!)
So much for the questions.
Shalom,
Panentheist
Panenetheist.