Last night when I listened to the webinar with Alan Hirsch - he commented at one point on a large survey done in Australia - asking people their opinions/interest re God, Jesus, spirituality & church. The results -
God
Jesus
Spirituality
Church
He commented that it's important not to confuse 'church' with its message. Some connections to this video I think. Somehow church needs to become a better vector for the message, in our post-Christendom world. Or I suppose Marshall McLuhan might have said the Medium is INTERFERING with the Message.
“Right when I heard that, it just convicted me and God used it as one of those Spirit moments where it’s just ‘man he’s right,’” Bethke told CP. “I realized a lot of my views and treatments of the church were not Scripture-based, they were very experienced-based.”
He added, “And that’s when I realized that wasn’t right. God’s church is holy, that’s his bride.”
**************
“It has nothing to do with the actual church,” Bethke stated. “It’s a synonym used for Pharisee-type legalistic, self-righteous people that are opposed to the church and opposed to Christianity. So that’s my definition of [false religion].”
***********
According to Bethke, his main message to young Christians struggling with feelings of distrust and hate for the church is to not let events of the past “blind or block your view of what the church is saying.”
“Don’t listen to what society is saying,” he advised. “The ultimate authority is the word of God and we have to submit ourselves to that. Return to the Scripture and trust that God knows best.
“There are a lot of times we put the Bible below us and say, ‘Okay I’m going to listen to it, I’m going to read it, but its below me so I have [the] ultimate say.’ We don’t realize the arrogance of that statement – to say ‘we know better than God.’
“So we need to elevate the Scriptures, put them back where they belong, see the word of God as the ultimate authority and say ‘God this might not sound politically correct to me, but I trust that you’re after my joy.’”
****************
___________
13 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”
14 They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”
15 “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?”
16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”
17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[b] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[c] will not overcome it.(Matthew 16:13-17)
hey, he's entitled to his beliefs, just as much as anyone else.
personally, i prefer his origional statement. but if his faith has changed since then, i think thats a good thing... faith is a living thing, it is fluid and grows and changes, otherwise it is dead. imho.
all of us are on different faith journeys, and what one person needs to hear of feel is not the same as another... everyones faith is unique.
Hey BB. I read Watchman Nee back in the 1970s & I see the same connection. Although Watchman Nee was Protestant, I remember him as having that same bare, lean, even fierce quality that Eastern Orthodoxy often does. That sense of total commitment can make Western Christian spirituality look kind of lazy in comparison.
Hey BB. I read Watchman Nee back in the 1970s & I see the same connection. Although Watchman Nee was Protestant, I remember him as having that same bare, lean, even fierce quality that Eastern Orthodoxy often does. That sense of total commitment can make Western Christian spirituality look kind of lazy in comparison.
Rishi, you don't look old enough to have read that in the 70's, you must have some secret:)
I have read some eastern orthodox material and watched a video of a sermon/ lecture last night. Interesting, does make the western stuff seem to lack depth.
I have read some eastern orthodox material and watched a video of a sermon/ lecture last night. Interesting, does make the western stuff seem to lack depth.
Yes. To me it seems that in the East the tradition itself -- their most basic sense of what Christianity is -- has been less modernized than it has been in the West. I've also read, though, that this is changing. For example, now that Russia is developing a free market economy, the sacred images of icons are being used in advertizing to sell various products.
Kimmio wrote:
Rishi, you don't look old enough to have read that in the 70's, you must have some secret:)
The secret is that this photo was taken 9 years ago. I'm 52 now, more grey and more round, but the haircut is the same.
Great video ---and I agree Religion is external only and has nothing to do with the inner spiritual side of us ---also as he pointed out Jesus didn't come to bring a new Religion but to bring closer to our spiritual inner side .
Religion in my view has nothing to offer but human input that in some cases has resulted in many deaths as with Jim Joans and others who use religion to puff themselves up and destroy others in God's name.
Everything that we see in this physical word came from the unseen realm ---the spiritual realm is the parent of this physical realm ----Everything we make or do starts with a thought -- which is unseen ----our body moves to our thoughts ----
The mouse trap ---was first a thought --it wasn't in existance at that point --so now the thought moved the body to start the process of bringing the trap into this physical seen realm ---it was brought from the unseen into the seen as is everything .
Here is our problem in the term religion. On the one hand it is the unequestioned factor of human development and history. To be human is to be religious. ( this is what now call spiritual) We use somethings but ARE religious.. ( When science works as a cosomology it is being religious.)
Religion has also its doctrinal apsects, its rational aspects, emotional aspects, its ritual aspects. Each of these and all these form what we call a religion ( Buddhism etc) and within each religion there are sub sets- and within the subsets there are a variety of ways of being religious (back to doctrine etc) So religion is evolving and yet is a dynamic in that evolving process.
Your character is developed acording to your faith. This is the primary religious truth from which on one can escape. Religion is froce of belief cleansing the inward parts.
"Religon is what the individaul does with his ( her) own solitariness. It runs through three stages, it it evolves to its final satisfact. It is the transition from God the void to God the enemy, and from God the enmy to God the compasinion." ( Religion in the Making AN Whitehead)
If you are never solitary you are never religous. As part or outcom, what you do in your solitidute should drive you to world solidarity. Bibles, codes, rituals, churches, are the trapping of religion, its passing forms.
What should emerge from religon is individual worth of character. But worth is positive or negative, good or bad. Religion is by no means necessarily good. It can be evil. So it matters what religion you follow.
You cannot have Jesus without religion. The religion of Jesus is a subset which can inform us. It is the ritual that connects us with that spirit and it is the feeling of the spirit that forms us finally, creates our character. Again what we do in solidariness that drives to world loyalty.
There's much wisdom in that post that I find very helpful, Pan. Especially, the part about the stages. I did go through similar stages...prior to seeking religion I was feeling God was out there in a void, then feeling like God must be against me, and now feeling like God is a companion...now, I continue to decipher what (not who but what--and mostly the what holding me back is a combination of fear and my own ego) it is that is not my companion, and seek to make changes in my life that will benefit the greater good. Thank you for writing about that..
Admittedly, having grown up with not much exposure to religion, especially ritual, sometimes it is the ritual aspect of religion that I am uncomfortable with...someone somewhere a long time ago came up with certain rituals,...not necessarily prescribed by Jesus...some just make me uncomforatable. Sometimes it is my resistance against what I quite rightly don't feel good about...and I am sure it is sometimes resistance against what I might need to engage in also to let go of my ego and overcome my fear.
Your character is developed acording to your faith. This is the primary religious truth from which no one can escape.
. . .
What should emerge from religon is individual worth of character. But worth is positive or negative, good or bad. Religion is by no means necessarily good. It can be evil. So it matters what religion you follow.
. . .
You cannot have Jesus without religion. ... It is the ritual that connects us with that spirit and it is the feeling of the spirit that forms us finally, creates our character.
Nice thoughts about character.
I would add that we can only care for the formation of our characters when we enjoy genuine leisure in our lives. And it is the rhythms of religion that create these regular spiritual resting places in our lives. This relates to the other thread about "personal piety." Virtuous acts emerge from a virtuous character, and virtuous characters are formed through the regular rhythms of religion, which alternate between good work and deep peaceful rest.
Your character is developed acording to your faith. This is the primary religious truth from which no one can escape.
. . .
What should emerge from religon is individual worth of character. But worth is positive or negative, good or bad. Religion is by no means necessarily good. It can be evil. So it matters what religion you follow.
. . .
You cannot have Jesus without religion. ... It is the ritual that connects us with that spirit and it is the feeling of the spirit that forms us finally, creates our character.
Nice thoughts about character.
I would add that we can only care for the formation of our characters when we enjoy genuine leisure in our lives. And it is the rhythms of religion that create these regular spiritual resting places in our lives. This relates to the other thread about "personal piety." Virtuous acts emerge from a virtuous character, and virtuous characters are formed through the regular rhythms of religion, which alternate between good work and deep peaceful rest.
It's over a decade ago that Rev. Chris Levan wrote a book entitled "God Hates Religion". I can't put my finger on it right now, so I'm going by memory. He showed how Jesus, and the prophets before him, criticized the misuse of religion at the time - the ways religion was observed in practice but not in spirit - hollow festivals, sacrifices without meaning, rituals. And how religion was used to benefit those in power and to control the common people, adding to their burdens rather than being a source of comfort and help, neglecting the poor, the widow and the orphan, failing to show hospitality to the alien. But he didn't stop there. He claimed that many of our modern churches continue the same practices that Jesus railed against, while claiming to 'believe in' Jesus.
It seems to me that God hates religion when it gets in the way of loving God and neighbour, when it is a stumbling block for those who follow the Way that Jesus followed.
The prophets carried God's message - "I am sick and tired of your sacrifices, your festivals, your religious observances."
Paul wrote - "If I speak in the tongues of angels, but do not love, I am a noisy gong. If I have prophetic powers and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and have all faith, but do not love, I am nothing. If I give away all my possessions and if I hand over my body so that I may boast, but do not hav elove I gain nothing."
And in between Jesus, while continuing to worship and practice his relgion, challanged and criticized the religious leaders of his time, and even held up the widow's mite in contrast to the generous gifts of the publican.
There is nothing new in stating 'I hate religion' and criticizing when and where you think it has gone wrong. In fact I think that we are called to do just that.
Chris did not understand religion - made a nice point but read my post above- religion is a reality and comes in both good and bad forms - you cannot get away from religion being basic to who we are - it is a given. Yes one can and ought to critize forms that are human created but metaphysically it is part of the web of life. Like a meme.
Pan - my post followed yours but was not directly a reply. Rather it was an observation that this whole idea of hating religion is not new; its been around since long before Jesus.
Comments
carolla
very interesting
Posted on: 01/26/2012 21:15
very interesting Rishi.
Last night when I listened to the webinar with Alan Hirsch - he commented at one point on a large survey done in Australia - asking people their opinions/interest re God, Jesus, spirituality & church. The results -
God
Jesus
Spirituality
Church

He commented that it's important not to confuse 'church' with its message. Some connections to this video I think. Somehow church needs to become a better vector for the message, in our post-Christendom world. Or I suppose Marshall McLuhan might have said the Medium is INTERFERING with the Message.
sighsnootles
carolla wrote: Or I
Posted on: 01/27/2012 12:58
Or I suppose Marshall McLuhan might have said the Medium is INTERFERING with the Message.
i totally agree.
Arthur Curry
http://www.christianpost.com/
Posted on: 01/27/2012 13:30
http://www.christianpost.com/news/why-i-hate-religion-but-love-jesus-poe...
or his recant.
“Right when I heard that, it just convicted me and God used it as one of those Spirit moments where it’s just ‘man he’s right,’” Bethke told CP. “I realized a lot of my views and treatments of the church were not Scripture-based, they were very experienced-based.”
He added, “And that’s when I realized that wasn’t right. God’s church is holy, that’s his bride.”
**************
“It has nothing to do with the actual church,” Bethke stated. “It’s a synonym used for Pharisee-type legalistic, self-righteous people that are opposed to the church and opposed to Christianity. So that’s my definition of [false religion].”
***********
According to Bethke, his main message to young Christians struggling with feelings of distrust and hate for the church is to not let events of the past “blind or block your view of what the church is saying.”
“Don’t listen to what society is saying,” he advised. “The ultimate authority is the word of God and we have to submit ourselves to that. Return to the Scripture and trust that God knows best.
“There are a lot of times we put the Bible below us and say, ‘Okay I’m going to listen to it, I’m going to read it, but its below me so I have [the] ultimate say.’ We don’t realize the arrogance of that statement – to say ‘we know better than God.’
“So we need to elevate the Scriptures, put them back where they belong, see the word of God as the ultimate authority and say ‘God this might not sound politically correct to me, but I trust that you’re after my joy.’”
****************
___________
13 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”
14 They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”
15 “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?”
16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”
17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[b] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[c] will not overcome it.(Matthew 16:13-17)
sighsnootles
hey, he's entitled to his
Posted on: 01/27/2012 13:50
hey, he's entitled to his beliefs, just as much as anyone else.
personally, i prefer his origional statement. but if his faith has changed since then, i think thats a good thing... faith is a living thing, it is fluid and grows and changes, otherwise it is dead. imho.
all of us are on different faith journeys, and what one person needs to hear of feel is not the same as another... everyones faith is unique.
blackbelt
That is a really wonderfull
Posted on: 01/27/2012 13:55
That is a really wonderfull video , reminds me of a book i read and still refrence to it
rishi
Hey BB. I read Watchman Nee
Posted on: 01/27/2012 15:21
Hey BB. I read Watchman Nee back in the 1970s & I see the same connection. Although Watchman Nee was Protestant, I remember him as having that same bare, lean, even fierce quality that Eastern Orthodoxy often does. That sense of total commitment can make Western Christian spirituality look kind of lazy in comparison.
blackbelt
rishi wrote: Hey BB. I read
Posted on: 01/27/2012 23:39
Hey BB. I read Watchman Nee back in the 1970s & I see the same connection. Although Watchman Nee was Protestant, I remember him as having that same bare, lean, even fierce quality that Eastern Orthodoxy often does. That sense of total commitment can make Western Christian spirituality look kind of lazy in comparison.
I agree, this book was a real eye openor for me
InannaWhimsey
"Are we there yet?" "GO
Posted on: 01/28/2012 02:05
"Are we there yet?"
"GO DEEPER!"
"How 'bout this burning bush?"
"GO DEEPER!"
Kimmio
Rishi, you don't look old
Posted on: 01/28/2012 07:04
Rishi, you don't look old enough to have read that in the 70's, you must have some secret:)
I have read some eastern orthodox material and watched a video of a sermon/ lecture last night. Interesting, does make the western stuff seem to lack depth.
rishi
Kimmio wrote: I have read
Posted on: 01/28/2012 09:02
I have read some eastern orthodox material and watched a video of a sermon/ lecture last night. Interesting, does make the western stuff seem to lack depth.
Yes. To me it seems that in the East the tradition itself -- their most basic sense of what Christianity is -- has been less modernized than it has been in the West. I've also read, though, that this is changing. For example, now that Russia is developing a free market economy, the sacred images of icons are being used in advertizing to sell various products.
Rishi, you don't look old enough to have read that in the 70's, you must have some secret:)
The secret is that this photo was taken 9 years ago. I'm 52 now, more grey and more round, but the haircut is the same.
unsafe
Hi rishi Great
Posted on: 01/28/2012 10:24
Hi rishi
Great video ---and I agree Religion is external only and has nothing to do with the inner spiritual side of us ---also as he pointed out Jesus didn't come to bring a new Religion but to bring closer to our spiritual inner side .
Religion in my view has nothing to offer but human input that in some cases has resulted in many deaths as with Jim Joans and others who use religion to puff themselves up and destroy others in God's name.
Everything that we see in this physical word came from the unseen realm ---the spiritual realm is the parent of this physical realm ----Everything we make or do starts with a thought -- which is unseen ----our body moves to our thoughts ----
The mouse trap ---was first a thought --it wasn't in existance at that point --so now the thought moved the body to start the process of bringing the trap into this physical seen realm ---it was brought from the unseen into the seen as is everything .
This is just my view on this ---Peace
Arminius
Hi Rishi: What I just
Posted on: 01/28/2012 14:49
Hi Rishi:
What I just wrote on your Eastern Christian Spirituality thread also applies here.
Panentheism
Here is our problem in the
Posted on: 01/31/2012 14:56
Here is our problem in the term religion. On the one hand it is the unequestioned factor of human development and history. To be human is to be religious. ( this is what now call spiritual) We use somethings but ARE religious.. ( When science works as a cosomology it is being religious.)
Religion has also its doctrinal apsects, its rational aspects, emotional aspects, its ritual aspects. Each of these and all these form what we call a religion ( Buddhism etc) and within each religion there are sub sets- and within the subsets there are a variety of ways of being religious (back to doctrine etc) So religion is evolving and yet is a dynamic in that evolving process.
Your character is developed acording to your faith. This is the primary religious truth from which on one can escape. Religion is froce of belief cleansing the inward parts.
"Religon is what the individaul does with his ( her) own solitariness. It runs through three stages, it it evolves to its final satisfact. It is the transition from God the void to God the enemy, and from God the enmy to God the compasinion." ( Religion in the Making AN Whitehead)
If you are never solitary you are never religous. As part or outcom, what you do in your solitidute should drive you to world solidarity. Bibles, codes, rituals, churches, are the trapping of religion, its passing forms.
What should emerge from religon is individual worth of character. But worth is positive or negative, good or bad. Religion is by no means necessarily good. It can be evil. So it matters what religion you follow.
You cannot have Jesus without religion. The religion of Jesus is a subset which can inform us. It is the ritual that connects us with that spirit and it is the feeling of the spirit that forms us finally, creates our character. Again what we do in solidariness that drives to world loyalty.
Kimmio
There's much wisdom in that
Posted on: 01/31/2012 16:14
There's much wisdom in that post that I find very helpful, Pan. Especially, the part about the stages. I did go through similar stages...prior to seeking religion I was feeling God was out there in a void, then feeling like God must be against me, and now feeling like God is a companion...now, I continue to decipher what (not who but what--and mostly the what holding me back is a combination of fear and my own ego) it is that is not my companion, and seek to make changes in my life that will benefit the greater good. Thank you for writing about that..
Admittedly, having grown up with not much exposure to religion, especially ritual, sometimes it is the ritual aspect of religion that I am uncomfortable with...someone somewhere a long time ago came up with certain rituals,...not necessarily prescribed by Jesus...some just make me uncomforatable. Sometimes it is my resistance against what I quite rightly don't feel good about...and I am sure it is sometimes resistance against what I might need to engage in also to let go of my ego and overcome my fear.
rishi
Panentheism wrote: Your
Posted on: 01/31/2012 16:44
Your character is developed acording to your faith. This is the primary religious truth from which no one can escape.
. . .
What should emerge from religon is individual worth of character. But worth is positive or negative, good or bad. Religion is by no means necessarily good. It can be evil. So it matters what religion you follow.
. . .
You cannot have Jesus without religion. ... It is the ritual that connects us with that spirit and it is the feeling of the spirit that forms us finally, creates our character.
Nice thoughts about character.
I would add that we can only care for the formation of our characters when we enjoy genuine leisure in our lives. And it is the rhythms of religion that create these regular spiritual resting places in our lives. This relates to the other thread about "personal piety." Virtuous acts emerge from a virtuous character, and virtuous characters are formed through the regular rhythms of religion, which alternate between good work and deep peaceful rest.
Panentheism
rishi wrote: Panentheism
Posted on: 01/31/2012 17:03
Your character is developed acording to your faith. This is the primary religious truth from which no one can escape.
. . .
What should emerge from religon is individual worth of character. But worth is positive or negative, good or bad. Religion is by no means necessarily good. It can be evil. So it matters what religion you follow.
. . .
You cannot have Jesus without religion. ... It is the ritual that connects us with that spirit and it is the feeling of the spirit that forms us finally, creates our character.
Nice thoughts about character.
I would add that we can only care for the formation of our characters when we enjoy genuine leisure in our lives. And it is the rhythms of religion that create these regular spiritual resting places in our lives. This relates to the other thread about "personal piety." Virtuous acts emerge from a virtuous character, and virtuous characters are formed through the regular rhythms of religion, which alternate between good work and deep peaceful rest.
amen
seeler
It's over a decade ago that
Posted on: 01/31/2012 23:04
It's over a decade ago that Rev. Chris Levan wrote a book entitled "God Hates Religion". I can't put my finger on it right now, so I'm going by memory. He showed how Jesus, and the prophets before him, criticized the misuse of religion at the time - the ways religion was observed in practice but not in spirit - hollow festivals, sacrifices without meaning, rituals. And how religion was used to benefit those in power and to control the common people, adding to their burdens rather than being a source of comfort and help, neglecting the poor, the widow and the orphan, failing to show hospitality to the alien. But he didn't stop there. He claimed that many of our modern churches continue the same practices that Jesus railed against, while claiming to 'believe in' Jesus.
It seems to me that God hates religion when it gets in the way of loving God and neighbour, when it is a stumbling block for those who follow the Way that Jesus followed.
The prophets carried God's message - "I am sick and tired of your sacrifices, your festivals, your religious observances."
Paul wrote - "If I speak in the tongues of angels, but do not love, I am a noisy gong. If I have prophetic powers and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and have all faith, but do not love, I am nothing. If I give away all my possessions and if I hand over my body so that I may boast, but do not hav elove I gain nothing."
And in between Jesus, while continuing to worship and practice his relgion, challanged and criticized the religious leaders of his time, and even held up the widow's mite in contrast to the generous gifts of the publican.
There is nothing new in stating 'I hate religion' and criticizing when and where you think it has gone wrong. In fact I think that we are called to do just that.
Kimmio
Great post, seeler.
Posted on: 02/01/2012 00:01
Great post, seeler.
Panentheism
Chris did not understand
Posted on: 02/01/2012 00:45
Chris did not understand religion - made a nice point but read my post above- religion is a reality and comes in both good and bad forms - you cannot get away from religion being basic to who we are - it is a given. Yes one can and ought to critize forms that are human created but metaphysically it is part of the web of life. Like a meme.
seeler
Pan - my post followed yours
Posted on: 02/01/2012 06:57
Pan - my post followed yours but was not directly a reply. Rather it was an observation that this whole idea of hating religion is not new; its been around since long before Jesus.