gia responded to a post in one of his threads to a post I wrote with this:
gia said: "Yes indeed.
We do not fear trying to correct those who are wrong in their thinking.
It is duty towards man that brings us here to fight those who believe in fantasy.
Regards
DL"
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada

Comments
Tyson
Thank goodness gia has come
Posted on: 03/31/2010 14:30
Thank goodness gia has come here to save us.
What is wrong with this picture?
footprints165
What's the context? Sounds
Posted on: 03/31/2010 14:48
What's the context?
Sounds like the typical "everyone needs to convert to save the world" mumbo-jumbo.
kaythecurler
Sounds to me like the sort of
Posted on: 03/31/2010 16:20
Sounds to me like the sort of stuff that keeps people away from churches generation after generation.
efficient_cause
There's nothing wrong with
Posted on: 03/31/2010 17:01
There's nothing wrong with trying to persuade someone of a different belief, but the kicker is that it must be done with tact, diplomacy, intelligence and sensitivity.
revjohn
Hi
Posted on: 03/31/2010 17:04
Hi consumingfireV4.0
Thank goodness gia has come here to save us.
Well, he is not alone in that mission is he?
What is wrong with this picture?
I'm wondering who the "we" and "us" are? I confess to not being fond of folk who refer to themselves in the third person.
So this was a part of which conversation (thread references are sometimes helpful) and how did the conversation get to this point and where did it go afterwards?
Grace and peace to you.
John
stoneeyeball
What was he smoking,
Posted on: 03/31/2010 18:50
What was he smoking, drinking, injesting or sniffing at the time? Yes, indeed. GIA has his own fantasy world. His evasive tactics are legend. He wrote:
"You might note that he likes stalking. He follows me like a puppy all over the internet. I do not mind the advertising but it shows that this guy has no life other than sowing ignorant remarks around and being too afraid to speak to the issues.
Regards
DL"
ROTFLMAO. GIA, YOU don't discuss! You only speak to the issue according to your own rules and agenda. You evade and ignore any input that opposes your 'wisdom'. The reaction of people to your other posts on other websites indicates they don't recognize your self-appointed 'genius'. As far as stalking, that's a joke,but then again, so are your postings. The master of ignorant remarks (that's YOU dude) should recognize them when he sees them, and you obviously do. I've given you plenty of input on the issues, DL, and the best you could do is complain because there was too much info. Really. LOL. Oh, oh, time to be evasive again. Have you ever read a book besides the comics? Have you ever taken a college level course where you had to do some actual work? Admit it, you're a joke. But, we all need a good laugh every day. Your fantasy world includes you being a legend in your own mind. If you think anyone is naieve enough to swallow your tripe, then some village is missing their idiot.
southpaw
I just returned recently to
Posted on: 04/27/2010 10:21
I just returned recently to Wondercafe, so I'm trying to play catch up on things. GIA seems to thrive on attention and is 'fundamentalist' in that he considers HIS view as the only correct answer and everyone should think as he does. Good Luck! Intimidation and false assumptions aren't licence to twist everything to your own liking and expect everyone else to go along under "'penalty"' of being called names, etc. The best thing to do is ignore him, refuse to be baited by his posts, and go on. The one advantage to beating your head against a wall is that it feels good when you stop. One church denomination had a minister who was doing 'improper' things. When confronted, he replied they couldn't kick him out, he's independent. They replied that he was, and now he was very independent. He wasn't leaving them, they were leaving him. If you ignore him long enough, he may get the message.
Witch
I've commented bbefore that
Posted on: 04/27/2010 11:22
I've commented bbefore that GIA is vehemently against a caricature of Christianity that he seems to think all Christians adhere to.
He doersn't seem to want to hear that not all Christians believe the same things, and not all afre guilty of the things he wants them to be guilty of.
In his own way, he's also a fundie.
Although he seems to have mellowed a bit lately...
southpaw
Witch wrote: I've commented
Posted on: 04/27/2010 11:55
I've commented bbefore that GIA is vehemently against a caricature of Christianity that he seems to think all Christians adhere to.
He doersn't seem to want to hear that not all Christians believe the same things, and not all afre guilty of the things he wants them to be guilty of.
In his own way, he's also a fundie.
Although he seems to have mellowed a bit lately...
I gotcha! Just think "Homer Simpson" and we'll understand more about GIA. D'oh. How could we have missed that?
revjohn
I'll give GIA some credit
Posted on: 04/27/2010 12:06
I'll give GIA some credit for one thing.
He pretty much keeps to himself.
Rare is the thread that he posts to that he did not start himself.
He is the most easily avoided member of the WonderCafe.
I tried to engage him shortly after he arrived. His conversational skills, um, suck and as Witch points out he really isn't interested in different points of view.
I haven't popped into any of his threads in a while maybe I should look some over to see what exactly is going on inside of them.
Grace and peace to you.
John
stardust
GIA classifies himself as
Posted on: 04/27/2010 13:08
GIA classifies himself as being Gnostic I believe. He believes its his duty or mission in life to enlighten others. I've checked out some of the other forums he posts on. He usually doesn't receive much in the way of responses. I believe he's retired and may be a loner meaning the internet is a hobby for him providing some contact with humanity.
I agree with Rev. John that nobody is twisting my arm to respond to or post in his threads.
I had determined that if there was a God at all, then whatever he had created had to be perfect and that that
This perfection would maintain itself over time. Never backsliding to imperfection.
God could never look down on earth and say, oops what the hell happened to my perfect world, it was good and now look at it, imperfect.
His will is supreme and not even a world of humans could collectively thwart His will with theirs.
I began to see this perfection that had to be here even with evils and sins and woes and that is when I found God. I went into the spirit, as the ancients used to say and God showed me the pain and pleasure of knowing that He was actually there.
I am not sure yet if it is the Christian God or not because I see the Bible as a consolidation of the then known religions. A bit from one and a bit from another.
The God I found is one of infinite love for humanity. He does not kill us or otherwise interfere but is there for those who seek.
He does not match the God that literal readers of scripture know.
That literal God, if the old testament is believed as the WORD does not have infinite love for man because He tends to kill them quite often. Sodom, Noah’s flood and many other times and places.
southpaw
Actually, most of GIA's
Posted on: 04/27/2010 14:41
Actually, most of GIA's threads are a smokescreen for his primary objective(s). His agenda may include power, control, domination and subjugation. What varies is the means by which these are pursued. People in this category commit mostly non-arrestable offences. His contempt for the Church and anyone who disagrees with his thoughts are 'fair game' for his vitriolic attacks. He feels powerless in his own life and this is one way of compensating for those feelings. He needs more help than anyone can give him on wondercafe, but he'll never seek that assistance unless there's a crisis situation. Even then, he will likely be evasive because of the strength of the power drive. The power drive is as strong or stronger in some people as the sex drive. Either he was unable to find fulfillment in his work life, or he's retired and can't adjust to loss of prestige, power or position. For myself, I'd rather do a 'Tims Run' for a coffee.
joejack
revjohn wrote: I haven't
Posted on: 04/27/2010 18:36
I haven't popped into any of his threads in a while maybe I should look some over to see what exactly is going on inside of them.
Hi, John. Especially his thead on slavery which got removed by admin, I presume. I gave up. His idea of 'discussion' seems to be you either agree with him or you're wrong. Even when you do answer his 'question' (as if anyone is obligated to do so), he won't acknowledge it as 'answered' unless it's in his favour. Just leave the guy alone, I guess. I see he's trying to troll his way back in by going to his former threads and trying to argue with those who have posted last month. I have better things to do with my time. Sleep, watch gorgeous women at the mall, eat apples, be an annoyance on wondecafe, whoops, I'd better stop already.
joejack
Well, if you can't beat 'em,
Posted on: 04/27/2010 19:05
Well, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Start your own thread of nonsense questions. Turn off your brain, forget scholarly insight, just write whatever comes to your mind. Here's a suggestion for GIA if he/she ever runs out of ideas or gives up trying to be a theologian.
'Why is there anything rather than nothing?'
The Bible tells us that God created the heaven and the earth. Why would He do that? Cruel joke? Boredom? On a bet?
Why does anything at all exist? We don't regard existence as something, as it were, added to an already existent thing. But we do regard the existence of anything at all as something added to nothing. Such that we are perplexed that absolute nonexistence is not, as it were, reality. 'The world ought not to exist. There really should be nothing.'
If the word 'void' contrasts with nothing, then the word 'void' means nothing, not 'nothing'. The word 'void' would contrast with 'everything' in this case. Viewing "the world as a whole -- a limited whole" [and seeing it vanish] is the way Wittgenstein expressed this idea (TLP 6.45).
Seeing the existence of anything at all as a "plus", "something positive", leads us to ask the question: 'Why is there anything rather than nothing at all -- why does anything at all exist rather than nothing?'
What the heck make up your own. Enjoy.
Regardless,
JJ
Telephone is the medium
Selective breeding is the key
joejack
Another fine example of how
Posted on: 04/27/2010 20:11
Another fine example of how DL/GIA answers someone who disagreed with him/her on another website:
"Thanks for the B S dogma. All hear say.
Eve gave man his moral sense by eating of the tree of knowledge.
Would you give up yours?
That knowledge is the only thing that places us above the dumb animals.
Why would a God deny man knowledge that makes man a better man?
Regards
DL"
Wow, the level of maturity is impressive. Can you imagine him/her in a university classroom setting?
.
.
revjohn
Hello joejack and welcome to
Posted on: 04/28/2010 10:31
Hello joejack and welcome to WonderCafe,
I gave up. His idea of 'discussion' seems to be you either agree with him or you're wrong.
That is the impression that he gives to me as well.
Grace and peace to you.
John
joejack
But then, if he wasn't mean
Posted on: 04/30/2010 15:55
But then, if he wasn't mean spirited, academically incompetent and opinionated he might have no personality at all. He also seems to disappear on the weekends. Hmmmmm. Just speculation.
chansen
joejack wrote: But then, if
Posted on: 04/30/2010 18:33
But then, if he wasn't mean spirited, academically incompetent and opinionated he might have no personality at all. He also seems to disappear on the weekends. Hmmmmm. Just speculation.
With all the things you two have in common, I would expect you to get along better.
joejack
chansen wrote: joejack
Posted on: 04/30/2010 19:48
But then, if he wasn't mean spirited, academically incompetent and opinionated he might have no personality at all. He also seems to disappear on the weekends. Hmmmmm. Just speculation.
With all the things you two have in common, I would expect you to get along better.
Chansen, GIA and I are NOT an item, and if you're fishing for a threesome, I'm not into that either. Sorry. I realize it's Friday night but my door doesn't swing that way. I couldn't ENGINEER such a STRUCTURE. Could you?
chansen
I'm not fishing for
Posted on: 04/30/2010 20:08
I'm not fishing for anything. I'm just pointing out that you accusing someone of being "mean spirited, academically incompetent and opinionated" is tantamount to calling them your soulmate.
joejack
I don't follow your logic but
Posted on: 04/30/2010 21:14
I don't follow your logic but then, I'm watching Montreal lose right now to Pittsburgh. Unfortunately.
Happy Genius
efficient_cause
Posted on: 05/01/2010 00:09
There's nothing wrong with trying to persuade someone of a different belief, but the kicker is that it must be done with tact, diplomacy, intelligence and sensitivity.
Dag-nab! (Not to mention drat) So THAT's why my "You believe what I tell you, or I'll kick you again!" method is not very successful...
Happy Genius
revjohn wrote: Hi
Posted on: 05/01/2010 00:47
Hi consumingfireV4.0
Thank goodness gia has come here to save us.
Well, he is not alone in that mission is he?
What is wrong with this picture?
I'm wondering who the "we" and "us" are? I confess to not being fond of folk who refer to themselves in the third person.
Well, this person totally agrees with you!. He also decries those obnoxous people who think that his sense of humour is not fondness - producing.
So this was a part of which conversation (thread references are sometimes helpful) and how did the conversation get to this point and where did it go afterwards?
This area is a necessity, filling a void long ingored: A place where drivil, nonsense and utter worthless posts (Of which this is a prime example) is actually paid attention to by people whose brain needs a rest.
Time's up, people! Time to return to the Rishi-level!
Grace and peace to you.
Now, lets' see, which one do I get? Oh! They come together!
Happy Genius
chansen wrote: ... accusing
Posted on: 05/01/2010 01:24
... accusing someone of being "mean spirited, academically incompetent and opinionated" is tantamount to calling them your soulmate.
Good Lord!
I hadn't realized that so many people have become enamoured of me!
joejack
chansen wrote: I'm just
Posted on: 05/01/2010 06:01
I'm just pointing out that you accusing someone of being "mean spirited, academically incompetent and opinionated" is tantamount to calling them your soulmate.
I have no soulmate because I have no soul. I sold it years ago for tuition money. I wish I had it back, however. I need a mobility scooter, and would like to sell it again. My soul is sitting in a sealed container on a mantle in the house of the buyer. Maybe I could break in and steal it back. AFter all, i have no soul, eh? Chansen, I didn't know you believed in the 'soul'. How can you be a soulmate without a soul?
joejack
chansen wrote: I'm just
Posted on: 05/01/2010 06:02
I'm just pointing out that you accusing someone of being "mean spirited, academically incompetent and opinionated" is tantamount to calling them your soulmate.
I have no soulmate because I have no soul. I sold it years ago for tuition money. I wish I had it back, however. I need a mobility scooter, and would like to sell it again. My soul is sitting in a sealed container on a mantle in the house of the buyer. Maybe I could break in and steal it back. AFter all, i have no soul, eh? Chansen, I didn't know you believed in the 'soul'. How can you be a soulmate without a soul?
WaterBuoy
God ... everything was bored
Posted on: 05/01/2010 18:47
God ... everything was bored with nothing ... in true scientic form they made soemthing from nothing (called Love) and gave it two sides like Din Aries Coin ... are amused to see the sides battle ID out like Christians in the forum (Wonder Cafe?).
There are the primitive sorts and the Roman sorts ... obscure and oppressed because they can't get outside the temple of self ad mire Asian!
That's an An Neg Maw eh ...!
Much is lost in transliteration ...
joejack
Just out of sheer curiosity,
Posted on: 05/01/2010 19:40
Just out of sheer curiosity, where is GIA's Avatar from? I'lve seen it somewhere before, but my memory is not connecting here. Just curious?
Tyson
joejack wrote: Just out of
Posted on: 05/01/2010 20:16
Just out of sheer curiosity, where is GIA's Avatar from? I'lve seen it somewhere before, but my memory is not connecting here. Just curious?
I believe it is Kaa the python from Disney's butchered version of The Jungle Book.
joejack
I noticed Kaa seems to take
Posted on: 05/02/2010 13:18
I noticed Kaa seems to take the weekends off. As far as 'deep' thoughts, I haven't found any yet. Most of them are just plain ridiculous and stereotypical. I wonder if he/she isn't just some kid trying to have fun. At least, the mental age indicators would suggest that or an adult with an adolescent level of understanding and judgment. Who knows? On a more serious notes, will Vancouver go all the way over Chicago? Will Montreal rebound and take theirs in seven? These are even deeper thoughts! (Blast it, I wish I was fluent in English).;
Tyson
joejack
Posted on: 05/02/2010 15:48
............ As far as 'deep' thoughts, I haven't found any yet.................
I quite agree. Unfortunately, sarcasim sometimes does not translate well over the internet. I should have said "Deep Thoughts."
joejack
consumingfire V4.1
Posted on: 05/02/2010 21:08
............ As far as 'deep' thoughts, I haven't found any yet.................
I quite agree. Unfortunately, sarcasim sometimes does not translate well over the internet. I should have said "Deep Thoughts."
I majored in sarcasm in University, but only retained about 10% of it. Time for a refresher course.
joejack
consumingfire V4.1
Posted on: 05/02/2010 21:08
............ As far as 'deep' thoughts, I haven't found any yet.................
I quite agree. Unfortunately, sarcasim sometimes does not translate well over the internet. I should have said "Deep Thoughts."
I majored in sarcasm in University, but only retained about 10% of it. Time for a refresher course.
Tyson
joejack wrote: consumingfire
Posted on: 05/02/2010 21:10
............ As far as 'deep' thoughts, I haven't found any yet.................
I quite agree. Unfortunately, sarcasim sometimes does not translate well over the internet. I should have said "Deep Thoughts."
I majored in sarcasm in University, but only retained about 10% of it. Time for a refresher course.
lol...gia makes it so easy.
joejack
Well, ostensibly my first
Posted on: 05/03/2010 02:22
Well, ostensibly my first major was in Chemistry and Math, but sarcasm seemed to be the 'in' thing at that time. (Only one person ever took a swing at me. He was too drunk, missed, and fell on his side.)
WaterBuoy
ID's a good way to look up at
Posted on: 05/03/2010 07:22
ID's a good way to look up at all that surrounds on in irony!
Greatest I am
chansen wrote: I'm not
Posted on: 05/03/2010 14:20
I'm not fishing for anything. I'm just pointing out that you accusing someone of being "mean spirited, academically incompetent and opinionated" is tantamount to calling them your soulmate.
Yes indeed. The moment one does not believe in talking animals and water walking, one becomes academically incompetent and intellectually inferior.
Better that, in my view, than be gullible enough to believe in fantasy.
If a believer makes a claim, it is to him to back it up.
When believers invoking a book that begins with talking animals, what should expect from non believers if not incredulity?
If I came to you to preach of God and said that the information had to be believed from a book that had flying pigs in it that were supposed to be real, would you give much credence to anything I had to say.
WTF do believers in what others call fantasy expect from those who will or cannot believe in talking animals and miracles of all kinds?
I see nothing wrong with non believers asking those who claim that God lives, to put up or shut up.
You would do the same to me if I preached a God of flying pigs.
Believers just do not believe that reciprocity is fair play and expect others to do or believe what they themselves would reject if put in a different form.
Regards
DL
joejack
DL, after a four day absence,
Posted on: 05/03/2010 19:07
DL, after a four day absence, decided to bless everyone with the following words of wisdom:
"Thanks for the useless dogma.
Your God is a genocidal fool and I am not interested.
Regards
DL"
If he/she isn't interested, why bother posting at all? Nobody's going to be persuaded or convinced by such statements. Yessir, the 'Attention Seeker' is back. (That must be one heck of a hangover). Even negative attention is better than no attention, eh? Now, he/she is posting on websites other than his/her own. Is this a step forward or a step back?
Alex
Look at his avatar. Learn
Posted on: 05/03/2010 20:20
Look at his avatar. Learn from the story of Adam and Eve, and ignore the snakes in Paradise. joejack
joejack
Alex wrote: Look at his
Posted on: 05/03/2010 20:28
Look at his avatar. Learn from the story of Adam and Eve, and ignore the snakes in Paradise. joejack
Good one!
joejack
Greatest I am wrote: I see
Posted on: 05/03/2010 20:53
I see nothing wrong with non believers asking those who claim that God lives, to put up or shut up.
Regards
DL
DL/GIA/ nobody has to put up and nobody has to shut up on your, or anybody else's, say so. You can ask whatever you want. You can ask 'why is there air?' You can ask will the Leafs ever win the Stanley Cup in our lifetime. Nobody has to shut up because you, or anyone else, tells them to. That's arrogance to the max. Are you going to get a court order or gag order to enforce your demands? Who died and made you 'God'? I see nothing wrong with telling anyone with this arrogance to mind their own business and get a life. I'd go on, but the Vancouver game is about to begin. People have preached whatever they wish and no one has asked them for proof because, unlike you, nobody gives a hoot.
chansen
This isn't the olden days.
Posted on: 05/03/2010 21:08
This isn't the olden days. If you're going to claim belief in a god who actually listens to you, cares what you say, and intervenes in any way, you had better back up your claim. I wouldn't go so far as "shut up", because I have far too much fun with unsubstantiated claims to want them censored in any way. These days, the crazier believers look, the fewer people who want to be associated with them.
Tyson
chansen wrote: This isn't the
Posted on: 05/03/2010 21:30
This isn't the olden days. If you're going to claim belief in a god who actually listens to you, cares what you say, and intervenes in any way, you had better back up your claim. I wouldn't go so far as "shut up", because I have far too much fun with unsubstantiated claims to want them censored in any way. These days, the crazier believers look, the fewer people who want to be associated with them.
Again, if one does not force one's own beliefs on anybody else (or try to prove them), one does not have to back up (or prove to you) anything they believe. Their beliefs are their beliefs. Just because you require proof, that does not mean that anybody is required to offer you any.
gia has claimed that he is here to correct people's wrong thinking, so yeah, he would be required to pony up some proof for his beliefs.
chansen
GIA is a deist. He doesn't
Posted on: 05/03/2010 21:47
GIA is a deist. He doesn't claim that God intervenes, or that God does anything that could be observed. He literally has nothing to prove.
Of course, some Christians do make claims that demand evidence to be taken seriously. I agree that you're under no obligation to provide evidence for your ridiculous beliefs - just don't expect to be taken seriously by an ever-expanding segment of the population until you do.
Alex
Remember GIA avatar song?
Posted on: 05/03/2010 22:03
Remember GIA avatar song? Trust in Me
My avatars song is The Bear/Bare Necessities
Tyson
chansen wrote: ......I
Posted on: 05/03/2010 22:03
......I agree that you're under no obligation to provide evidence for your ridiculous beliefs.......
How very tolerant of you.
chansen
I don't have to be tolerant
Posted on: 05/03/2010 22:12
I don't have to be tolerant of your ridiculous beliefs, just like you don't have to justify your ridiculous beliefs. As long as those beliefs are (a) ridiculous, and (b) completely baseless, you run the risk of having them laughed at. Just keep telling yourself that I'm going to hell if it makes you feel better.
It's not like your beliefs have made you the poster boy for tolerance either, so I'm apparently not missing out on much.
Tyson
chansen wrote: Of course,
Posted on: 05/03/2010 22:17
Of course, some Christians do make claims that demand evidence to be taken seriously. I agree that you're under no obligation to provide evidence for your ridiculous beliefs - just don't expect to be taken seriously by an ever-expanding segment of the population until you do.
Fortunately, the non-believers that I know (and I know many), are a great deal more tolerant than you. Not all non-believers are set to ridicule people of faith. You however seem to delight in your intolerance and ridicule of others.
Tyson
chansen wrote: It's not
Posted on: 05/03/2010 22:24
It's not like your beliefs have made you the poster boy for tolerance either, so I'm apparently not missing out on much.
I never said I was. But you are usually one of the first people around here to point out intolerance in others, all the while being intolerant toward others. You are also a master at jumping to conslusions about other people and their beliefs when you do not even know them. You do not even know a quarter of what I believe. You amuse me, chansen. Thanks for the laughs.
Tyson
chansen wrote: I don't have
Posted on: 05/03/2010 22:41
I don't have to be tolerant of your ridiculous beliefs, just like you don't have to justify your ridiculous beliefs. As long as those beliefs are (a) ridiculous, and (b) completely baseless, you run the risk of having them laughed at.............
And I am supposed to care, why? I am secure enough in my beliefs that I could really care less if they are laughed at. I just find it amusing that for one who espouses tolerance, you sure can dish out the intolerance. Now THAT is rediculous.