This morning we got to view a cartoon. It focussed on the relationship one has with his/her God and his/her dog. The similarity hi-lighted was that a person can mistreat his/her dog but will always be greeted with a wagging tail when one returns and changes one's treatment of the dog. The similarity with our relationship with God is that all one has to do to restore the relationship with God is return to the fold. An example: the parrable of the wayward son.
Question: Is that all one has to do? There is no punishment? There is no payment for misdeeds? All we have to do is --- go home!
Comments please!
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada
Comments
SG
Panentheist, That is how I
Posted on: 11/22/2009 14:58
Panentheist,
That is how I have always seen it. For me, it has to be about who God is and not who we are. The parable of the wayward son has the son leaving and returning. The father is constant.
I do not believe God ever leaves us. I believe we leave God.
I have always believed in universal reconciliation or universal salvation. Certainly, some ancients like Clement and Origen did. It simply was stamped out. There was a vested interest in its destruction.
troyerboy
Wait a minute - Is God the
Posted on: 11/22/2009 15:21
Wait a minute - Is God the human who has to change it's treatment or the dog who wags his tail?
MC jae
God allows forgiveness to
Posted on: 11/22/2009 15:58
God allows forgiveness to flow into our lives, renews our relationships with Himself and others, and assures us of the God-love despite our sin.
We are the prodigal child who is lavishly welcomed and forgiven.
The God-forgiveness comes through Christ. Jesus Himself claimed and exercised the power to forgive sins.
GRR
Panentheist wrote: ....The
Posted on: 11/22/2009 16:22
....The similarity with our relationship with God is that all one has to do to restore the relationship with God is return to the fold. ....
Question: Is that all one has to do? There is no punishment? There is no payment for misdeeds? All we have to do is --- go home!
Comments please!
Until we once and for all get rid of this idea that we need to "restore our relationship with God" we will be forever stuck in the ditch of the highway of life, spinning our wheels and flinging mud and stones in all directions and going nowhere.
There are times when the inability of religion, especially Christianity, to heal itself of this addiction makes me almost want to become an atheist.
It is no wonder that people flock to guys like Tolle when traditional religion is fixated on this outdated and destructive concept.
Okay, sorry panen, rant mode off.
footprints165
Why do consequences have to
Posted on: 11/22/2009 16:57
Why do consequences have to come from God? Why do we so often overlook the consequences of our actions in this world and focus on what will happen in the afterlife? Isn't it enough to have to feel remorse and suffer the consequences of what we've said and done here? Seems to me that eternal damnation for making a few mistakes (and hopefully learning from those mistakes) is a little bit much. Especially when our own human criminal justice system treats the worst offenders with so much mercy and respect. At some point, we have to consider what we humans will tolerate among ourselves and recognize that if we can forgive the worst of crimes, God's ability to forgive must be beyond our comprehension.
The_Omnissiah
I believe that forgiveness is
Posted on: 11/22/2009 16:58
I believe that forgiveness is for everyone, but they have to try...at least a little, to earn it. You can't just go through your life a jack-ass, and then on your deathbed say "oops, sorry god" and not expect to get sentanced to a few years as a dung-fly lol.
:P
As-salaamu alaikum
-Omni
Pilgrims Progress
GoldenRule wrote: Until we
Posted on: 11/22/2009 17:02
Until we once and for all get rid of this idea that we need to "restore our relationship with God" we will be forever stuck in the ditch of the highway of life, spinning our wheels and flinging mud and stones in all directions and going nowhere.
Hi GR,
Could you elaborate on this, please?
My understanding is that as far as God is concerned, the relationship is always there. But, when it comes to our side of the relationship - there are times when, like the prodigal son, we choose to walk away. In that sense, wouldn't you define that as us needing to restore our relationship with God?
GRR
Pilgrims Progress
Posted on: 11/22/2009 18:38
Until we once and for all get rid of this idea that we need to "restore our relationship with God" we will be forever stuck in the ditch of the highway of life, spinning our wheels and flinging mud and stones in all directions and going nowhere.
Hi GR,
Could you elaborate on this, please?
My understanding is that as far as God is concerned, the relationship is always there. But, when it comes to our side of the relationship - there are times when, like the prodigal son, we choose to walk away. In that sense, wouldn't you define that as us needing to restore our relationship with God?
I love the story of the prodigal. The difficulty is that, like any other metaphor, its limited. Nevertheless - when the son decides to return, he starts out by saying "I'll admit to Dad that I'm not worthy...." Dad basically says "bull, of course you're worthy". The older son says, basically, "Crap Dad, you gotta make the kid suffer. I've been here sloppin' the hogs and he's been havin' sex with lots of good lookin' women, gettin' drunk and pukin' in the street, gorgin' himself on roast fowl and apricots and stuff." Dad says, essentially "huh. .... Come on in and have some fatted calf. Manuel outdid himself with the glaze."
Now, those who, like the older brother, want to be vicariously rewarded for their narrow ways and finger pointing by seeing someone who indulged in the flesh "pay for their sins", will still, no matter what, set all that aside, and say "Yes, but..."
This is the problem I see - that we still perceive the father and the son as separate entities, which lets us fool ourselves into thinking there's a "separation" that needs to be "restored."
The inseverability of our relationship Theos is challenging to put into words. I think a more accurate perspective is to say that we can never end our relationship with God ... but we can make it better. Or worse. And that better and worse is a reflection of how we act in and toward the world and each other.
If the prodigal had never, ever "come home" would he have stopped being a son to the man? Nope. If he had died at an orgy, in the middle of gorging on a wine soaked drumstick while fondling three SyroPhenician women, and the father learned of it, would the father have "brought him home" do you think for burial with the family?
Zeus-god might not.
Theos would.
MC jae
GoldenRule wrote:If the
Posted on: 11/22/2009 18:43
The prodigal son disowned his father by leaving. Now, of course the loving father, when the son stopped his disobedience, was more than willing to accept him back. This is the way I believe things work when it comes to God and us as well. When we stop resisting the God-Spirit, the Father who deeply, deeply loves us warmly welcomes us home.
GRR
Aquila wrote: GoldenRule
Posted on: 11/22/2009 18:47
The prodigal son disowned his father by leaving. Now, of course the loving father, when the son stopped his disobedience, was more than willing to accept him back. This is the way I believe things work when it comes to God and us as well. When we stop resisting the God-Spirit, the Father who deeply, deeply loves us warmly welcomes us home.
As per my comment on "Yes, but..." thank you for validating me so quickly.
graeme
punishment has nothing to do
Posted on: 11/22/2009 20:01
punishment has nothing to do with it. feeling sorry has nothing to do with it. changing has nothing to do with it. Forgiveness is the recognition that we are human and, as humans, have failings. It reminds all of us that we are not dealing with saints and sinners but with people.
To say someone is forgiven does not mean forget it'; it's okay.
It means I recognize that you (and I) are humans with human failings - so how can we most usefully deal with this problem?
The idea that God would create us with failings built in, and then punish us for having them is, to say least, silly.
Pilgrims Progress
GoldenRule wrote: If the
Posted on: 11/22/2009 21:07
If the prodigal had never, ever "come home" would he have stopped being a son to the man? Nope. If he had died at an orgy, in the middle of gorging on a wine soaked drumstick while fondling three SyroPhenician women, and the father learned of it, would the father have "brought him home" do you think for burial with the family?
Yes, it's not the father of the prodigal son I have the problem with.
Hypothetically, what if the son never acknowledged his father or their relationship - can there be a relationship if one party isn't open to it?
(As for the other brother, there goes the Protestant work ethic down the gurgler.)
Arminius
I don't believe in God as a
Posted on: 11/22/2009 21:22
I don't believe in God as a cosmic judge.
Making mistakes is an essential part of the learning process: we have to do things wrong in order to learn to do them right! As soon as a mistake is seen as such and remedied, it becomes a valuable learning experience.
Not making mistakes is the biggest mistake.
GRR
Pilgrims Progress
Posted on: 11/22/2009 22:05
If the prodigal had never, ever "come home" would he have stopped being a son to the man? Nope. If he had died at an orgy, in the middle of gorging on a wine soaked drumstick while fondling three SyroPhenician women, and the father learned of it, would the father have "brought him home" do you think for burial with the family?
Yes, it's not the father of the prodigal son I have the problem with.
Hypothetically, what if the son never acknowledged his father or their relationship - can there be a relationship if one party isn't open to it?
(As for the other brother, there goes the Protestant work ethic down the gurgler.)
Well, the original post was about "forgiveness." Which is all about the father. (my teeth ache just typing that old cliche image). So, in that sense, that Theos knows we're still part of the family even if we pretend we were raised by wolves, yes there is a relationship. That's why I used the example of the son dying in a drunken orgy before he came home. Dad would still bring the body back for internment in the family plot, so to speak.
Agapé is not about "forgiveness". The message of Christ is not about forgiveness. It's not about making our relationship with some Zeus-god "right". It's about becoming conscious of our relationships here and making them right.
RAN
Luke 15 (re: Prodigal Son) 1
Posted on: 11/22/2009 23:58
Luke 15 (re: Prodigal Son)
1 Now the tax collectors and sinners were all gathering around to hear Jesus. 2 But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law muttered, "This man welcomes sinners and eats with them."
By way of response Jesus told 3 parables: about a lost sheep, about a lost coin and about a lost son.
All 3 parables describe the joy over one sinner who repents. There is no mention of punishment, only of joy and welcome for the one who repented (or "turned back", perhaps?). It seems pretty clear that forgiveness is taken for granted in each case.
Pilgrims Progress
GoldenRule wrote: Agapé is
Posted on: 11/23/2009 00:05
Agapé is not about "forgiveness". The message of Christ is not about forgiveness. It's not about making our relationship with some Zeus-god "right". It's about becoming conscious of our relationships here and making them right.
This sounds fine by me. Relationships are about connecting with others with love. (Agape does seem the right word to use - except I can't figure out how to put that little thingy over the "e".)
Panentheist
RAN wrote: Luke 15 (re:
Posted on: 11/23/2009 01:35
Luke 15 (re: Prodigal Son)
1 Now the tax collectors and sinners were all gathering around to hear Jesus. 2 But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law muttered, "This man welcomes sinners and eats with them."
By way of response Jesus told 3 parables: about a lost sheep, about a lost coin and about a lost son.
All 3 parables describe the joy over one sinner who repents. There is no mention of punishment, only of joy and welcome for the one who repented (or "turned back", perhaps?). It seems pretty clear that forgiveness is taken for granted in each case.
Panentheism
It is of course all are saved
Posted on: 11/23/2009 18:05
It is of course all are saved - no ifs and buts ( even buts)
Arminius
To err is human, not to
Posted on: 11/23/2009 18:27
To err is human, not to forgive is stupid, to forgive is smart, but to realize that there is nothing to forgive is divine.
We all make mistakes; it is an essential part of the learning process and of being human. Some mistakes, though, are more severe than others, but we have to forgive them anyway, for our own peace of mind. And, if we ourselves have committed them, then we have to forgive ourselves.
Forgiveness does not mean approval, but forgiveness always implies accusation.
God, however, is beyond accusation and beyond forgiveness.
ninjafaery
Arminius wrote: God, however,
Posted on: 11/23/2009 18:30
God, however, is beyond accusation and beyond forgiveness.
GordW
Arminius wrote: God, however,
Posted on: 11/23/2009 19:19
God, however, is beyond accusation and beyond forgiveness.
I disagree. To say there is nothing to forgive is not divine it is naive. To know what actually needs forgiveness is wise and divine.
To forgive no matter what, to forgive and actually drop the matter--now that is divine (and seems to be beyond most of us humans).
ninjafaery
I don't know if I interpreted
Posted on: 11/23/2009 19:39
I don't know if I interpreted Arm's post correctly, but my understanding of the workings of Grace means that the need for forgiveness is our lot for being human. To see one another as God does is probably beyond us, but I don't believe anything is required of us from the perspective of God for the purpose of redemption. Redemption is our task to make available our understanding of God. God understands that we are helpless, for the most part, when it comes to being Love in the world.
We are understood beyond what we understand of ourselves.
IMO
Olivet_Sarah
GordW wrote: Arminius
Posted on: 11/23/2009 21:07
God, however, is beyond accusation and beyond forgiveness.
I disagree. To say there is nothing to forgive is not divine it is naive. To know what actually needs forgiveness is wise and divine.
To forgive no matter what, to forgive and actually drop the matter--now that is divine (and seems to be beyond most of us humans).
I agree with this - people DO do things which are wrong or perceived as wrongs - as such, forgiveness can't be written off. Anyone seeing my post from late last night down the board here, knows my family is going through a moment of crisis and forgiveness, and to suggest we should ignore wrongs by way of healing will simply be setting ourselves up for more of the same mistakes that brought us to this point as we have already been enablers with heads in the sand for too long. That said - it is our forgiveness, and forgiveness of us, that will allow all of us to move to a more positive place. I strongly believe that.
Similarly I believe God's welcome and forgiveness is always available to us, provided we are sincere in our desire for and approach to it (yes, no last minute 'CYA' deathbed professions of faith); in that sense it IS like a dog (I too have seen this video btw). When we leave our beloved pets at home, are they sad? For sure. If we mistreat them, do they need to learn to trust again? Sure. But they can, and they do, and they will. I think we humans have a lot to learn from God and dogs on this score - have expectations and needs, but also recognize there will always be those who fall short of them, and it is the trying, learning, and improving that counts.
qwerty
Yup! Just "go home"
Posted on: 11/23/2009 21:34
Yup! Just "go home" Panentheist. No punishments await. I would even suggest that even if every day of your life you resolve not to "come home" and reject God until the last hour you will still be welcomed. No questions asked.
graeme
I'm not a big admirer of
Posted on: 11/23/2009 22:22
I'm not a big admirer of forgiving and forgetting. I don't think that's what forgiveness is about. If a person rapes another, you forgive him - but you certainly don't forget it or just let it go. Forgiving simply does not mean that. It means recognizing that this person IS a real person with failing built in. You don't punish him for having failings, but you don't forget them, either. You have to deal with them, But you deal with them realizing you are dealing with a person. (Unless, of course, you actually believe in evil spirits, which I suspect many Christians do.)
Forgiveness has nothing to do with whether the offender really truly sincerely wants to be forgiven - that's sort of thinking is just a gloss on the old self righteous view of forgiveness.
There were societies in which people once were punished for being ill. Then we matured enough to realize people became ill because it was a human failing - and we dealt with the illness. Forgiveness is like that.
I don't pretend, incidentally, that I have the strength to forgive everybody no matter what. But I know I should.
Arminius
ninjafaery wrote: I don't
Posted on: 11/24/2009 00:29
I don't know if I interpreted Arm's post correctly, but my understanding of the workings of Grace means that the need for forgiveness is our lot for being human. To see one another as God does is probably beyond us, but I don't believe anything is required of us from the perspective of God for the purpose of redemption. Redemption is our task to make available our understanding of God. God understands that we are helpless, for the most part, when it comes to being Love in the world.
We are understood beyond what we understand of ourselves.
IMO
Hi ninjafaery:
I think the state of godly grace is the experience of cosmic unity or at-one-ment, when all is one, and all are one, when "we and the Father are one."
In this state there is no accusation, no judgement and hence no need for forgiveness. Only unconditional at-one-ment.
Evil is of essence to good. Evildoers carry for us the dark and heavy burden of evil so that we may bask in goodness and light. We should be grateful to them; our love and compassion should go out to them.
Serena
Calvinism would say that
Posted on: 11/24/2009 00:31
Calvinism would say that forgiveness is only for the elect. So then forgiveness is not for all. In fact those who are elect may do whatever evil they dream up and be forgiveness. Those who are not elect can do good things their whole life and sacrifice and yet will never be loved by God so they are likewise wasting their time.
Marzo
Arminius wrote: ninjafaery
Posted on: 11/24/2009 07:00
I don't know if I interpreted Arm's post correctly, but my understanding of the workings of Grace means that the need for forgiveness is our lot for being human. To see one another as God does is probably beyond us, but I don't believe anything is required of us from the perspective of God for the purpose of redemption. Redemption is our task to make available our understanding of God. God understands that we are helpless, for the most part, when it comes to being Love in the world.
We are understood beyond what we understand of ourselves.
IMO
Hi ninjafaery:
I think the state of godly grace is the experience of cosmic unity or at-one-ment, when all is one, and all are one, when "we and the Father are one."
In this state there is no accusation, no judgement and hence no need for forgiveness. Only unconditional at-one-ment.
Evil is of essence to good. Evildoers carry for us the dark and heavy burden of evil so that we may bask in goodness and light. We should be grateful to them; our love and compassion should go out to them.
Would you assert that "evil is of essence to good" if you were a victim of someone's evil behaviour?
If you say 'yes' to this, I don't believe you.
graeme
marzo - read your last
Posted on: 11/24/2009 07:22
marzo - read your last paragraph. I've no doubt it is true. But if it is, why have a faith and then go thinking in unfaithful terms. I don't see the point. It's like deciding to take up swimming - with the priviso that you really refuse to get wet.
Marzo
Graeme----I don't understand
Posted on: 11/24/2009 07:31
Graeme----I don't understand what you mean when you refer to "thinking in unfaithful terms".
Thanks for the comment anyway.
ninjafaery
I've been trying to find a
Posted on: 11/24/2009 10:57
I've been trying to find a way to articulate my thoughts more clearly, and I don't know if I can, but I don't agree with you, Arm, that evil is the shadow side of good, and is in any way necessary. And I'm not saying everything's groovy and we should just 'forgive and forget".
I'm agnostic. I'm not even sure I believe in god, but if I did, god would be as I described -- "Isness", "pure being". Beyond human projection.
Here's what I think.
We are fancy chimps. We wear neckties and smoke cigars and invent battery-operated cocktail stirrers and blow things up. We make a huge mess.
We evolved what we believe is "intelligence" over time to wage war on each other for limited resources. It was actually reading Jane Goodall's Reason for Hope that helped give form to what makes sense to me.
In our collective ignorance, we don't believe ourselves to be some kind of fancy primate. We need to understand that first before we can start to override our basic nature to change it.
We look at chimps and see them being cute, mischevious, caring and funny, but what we don't see is the pettiness, the horrible wars over bananas that culminate in tearing an infant apart or twisting the broken leg of an elder -- around and around.......
I don't want to make this post any longer right now, but I think if there is a god, we are viewed as the critters we are, and it's understood that we're at the mercy of our adaptation and genetics. Mass murderer, torture and adultery are part of that heritage -- maybe in some, like a cancer that takes over a life or a society.
God knows all this and still loves us -- if God exists.
On an interpersonal level, justice is needed if we are to adapt and survive.
Arminius
Marzo wrote: Arminius
Posted on: 11/24/2009 12:19
I don't know if I interpreted Arm's post correctly, but my understanding of the workings of Grace means that the need for forgiveness is our lot for being human. To see one another as God does is probably beyond us, but I don't believe anything is required of us from the perspective of God for the purpose of redemption. Redemption is our task to make available our understanding of God. God understands that we are helpless, for the most part, when it comes to being Love in the world.
We are understood beyond what we understand of ourselves.
IMO
Hi ninjafaery:
I think the state of godly grace is the experience of cosmic unity or at-one-ment, when all is one, and all are one, when "we and the Father are one."
In this state there is no accusation, no judgement and hence no need for forgiveness. Only unconditional at-one-ment.
Evil is of essence to good. Evildoers carry for us the dark and heavy burden of evil so that we may bask in goodness and light. We should be grateful to them; our love and compassion should go out to them.
Would you assert that "evil is of essence to good" if you were a victim of someone's evil behaviour?
If you say 'yes' to this, I don't believe you.
Hi Marzo:
I don't believe in my own goodness and light. I am beyond dualties, and thus inclusive of all dualities, and at home in goodness as well as badness, and darkness as well as light.
I have been the victim of people's evil behaviour.
To them, however, killing and maiming innocent women and children was not evil but part of the gallant WWII fight for freedom, which gets celebrated every year on Remembrance Day.
Hardly any evildoer gets up in the morning and says: "Today, I am going to be really evil!" The evil we see out there is of our own making, and we are responsible for our creations.
To be "beyond good and evil" is no justification for committing evil. Those who are beyond good and evil, in the godly state of non-duality, and act from the consciousness of that state, do not use this stance as an excuse for committing evil. They sanction civil and moral law, and abide by it.
When one experiences the unitive state of synthesis—which is not at all a mystical or otherworldy state but the ultimate state of being—then one feels overcome with unitive love and compassion and experiences unitive consciousness and conscience. One also realizes that opposites necessitate each other and are of essence to each other, and that people who are implicated in the world of dualities must necessarily be one opposite or the other, or both.
In Unitive Consciousness,
Arminius
crazyheart
I know God exists and no
Posted on: 11/24/2009 12:39
I know God exists and no matter what is done by us and to us, God welcomes us home. Can it get any better than this?
graeme
marzo - what I meant is that
Posted on: 11/24/2009 13:30
marzo - what I meant is that faith takes us past the normal human behaviours. To forgive someone who earnestly desires forgiveness is easy. Worse, it make us gods who decide who should be forgiven, and who should not be. But forgiveness is not our gift to give. It is a response require of us as a Christians.
Again, too, it does not mean that was done is forgotten or becomes okay. It means nothing like that. It means that we recognize that all us, including the sinner, do things that are wrong. Doing wrong is very human. We recognize that, and we deal with the wrong rather than just condemning the person.
chansen
crazyheart wrote:I know God
Posted on: 11/24/2009 14:07
Some reason for believing it would be a start.
Panentheism
Now chansen you know that no
Posted on: 11/24/2009 15:36
Now chansen you know that no matter what there is some belief (worldview0 hidding in all assertions. It is about the meaning of existence. One could take an Ann Rand position. One could take a pure materialist view in the marxist sense or in scientific mechanism, One could take an existentialist where are condemned to make meaning - one could take the idea that evolution is for the selfish gene. What ever those are just a start that organizes ones world for living. The reason for believing what crazyheart wrote ( to put words in her mouth) is suggests that our work and actions make a difference to the well being of the universe, and that we don't need to earn by actions but out of hope one works for good for in the end we are found in the everylasting love that is more than us and lures us on. We can live with confidence despite the real negativities of life.
In talking to an environmentalist who was discouraged and saw it all hopeless, he wondered if it was worth it. He had no overarching worldview of hope and he worked with a person who had faith and that encouraged him for she felt whatever was done for good added to the possibility there is a future. She was a pragmatic idealist - knew it might not work out but there was a force that lured the good.
The proof as they say is in the action. Even if is projection it makes a difference. And the very fact there is within history this ungoing hope does suggest a possibility of a source working in every nano second luring us on. So the reason is it does make us hopeful, realitistic and directed toward praxis.