Here are some questions that I've been pondering:
What do you understand the nature of the soul to be? Is it a purely nonphysical entity? If so, what is its relationship to the body? Do you feel that you can sense the presence of your soul, or the souls of others? We often speak of a soul "leaving" the body after death and uniting with God - but where did the soul come from? Has it "always" existed, or was it fashioned at birth? Does the soul change over time, or do you see it as immutable and perfect? Is the soul concious, or is consciousness purely a product of the mind?
I would love to hear what you think.
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada

Comments
Arminius
I think the soul is our
Posted on: 03/08/2010 23:55
I think the soul is our brain's memory body, which is being burned as a hologram into inverse space while we are alive, and stays there after the death of the physical body.
Neo
Always a good question
Posted on: 03/09/2010 00:27
Always a good question Orangina.
I see the soul as the mediator between spirit and matter.
Like a spiritual eye, the soul reflects God in it's image.
"Matter is the vehicle for the manifestation of soul on this plane of existence, and soul is the vehicle on a higher plane for the manifestation of spirit, and these three are a trinity synthesized by life, which pervades them all."
- The Tibetan
The relationship between body and soul is both psychic and physical. The soul, it's been said, can see in three different directions at once:
1. It can focus on the physical, when the latter becomes sensitive enough to respond.
2. It is aware of itself and is therefore "group conscious" of all the other souls in creation.
3 . It is always God-Aware and therefore "Cosmic Conscious" of the eternal.
The soul is our first Master.
Ichthys
Let me tell you this. I don't
Posted on: 03/09/2010 03:23
Let me tell you this. I don't believe in a "soul" as a part of a human being. I believe that mind + body = soul.
Genesis 1, 2:7 "the LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. "
I love the German translation which translates "living being" with "soul." And I think that's what it is. You have to admit that there is a connection between body and mind. E.g. When you feel bad, your body feels bad. Or when you try to do something that conflicts with your conscience you can feel that your body tries to resist. Do you know what I mean?
So what I'm trying to say is that there is no such thing as a soul in someone but rather every human being as a whole is a soul. But that's just my opinion.
Marzo
I can say with some certainty
Posted on: 03/09/2010 07:13
I can say with some certainty that consciousness transcends matter and that this consciousness continues to exist after the death of the body.
Our consciousness or soul develops within the material of the brain but is much more than matter and energy that can be measured.
Our soul or consciousness is more than the chemistry of the brain but is a part of, or an expression of the Eternal which exists beyond this world.
WaterBuoy
All of the above ... But
Posted on: 03/09/2010 11:29
All of the above ...
But there will be some resistance as some do not believe the metaphysical is real. It is probably (quantum) why some people find it difficult getting outside the box of mortal in a stretch to follow and impossible dream ... of chasing the wisdom (sole integgral) of God? Isn't that de Light as seen from the aether side? Even an atheist like Einstein could see that the hole relationship between the power of the mind (energy) and the thinking process (Maas) were related by Light ... "c" ... IC ... or IHS in some terms as the hole mystery is buried in the dirt of man ... an image in clay ... cle' o'pat-russ ... that's a Reuben of bloody humour's eh ... plasma-IC ... Light spirits arising in the old lamplighter ... spontaineous combustion in other tongues, along with anihlism .. the plague of the land giving fresh thought in lieu of a man that can't learn ... nothing from all the hate expressed! Pure emotion is sort of like a god, Furies in which thought is denied as bringing an a calm ... in a countercurrant brae'n storm of dark particles ... calming the light as in baptism of pyre amis dust! Yah must like what befalls yah ... as star dust ... heh?
Mendalla
Soul, to me, is the sum total
Posted on: 03/09/2010 14:06
Soul, to me, is the sum total of what makes each of us human. The arrangement of our neurons, the memories and personality traits encapsulated in that arrangement, the quirks and eccentricities, the creativity, and so on. Is it something eternal that goes on after we die? I'm agnostic on an afterlife, but I see no reason to suppose that it does, save in the marks that we leave on the world and other people. And I, for one, want those marks to be positive ones.
Mendalla
blackbelt
that's a great question, I
Posted on: 03/09/2010 13:17
ninjafaery
Mendalla wrote: Soul, to me,
Posted on: 03/09/2010 14:51
Soul, to me, is the sum total of what makes each of us human. The arrangement of our neurons, the memories and personality traits encapsulated in that arrangement, the quirks and eccentricities, the creativity, and so on. Is it something eternal that goes on after we die? I'm agnostic on an afterlife, but I see no reason to suppose that it does, save in the marks that we leave on the world and other people. And I, for one, want those marks to be positive ones.
Mendalla
Bingo. I see the soul as a vector -- a vapour trail of where we've been. Every choice we make from moment to moment creates our "soul".
Ichthys
@ninjafaery Agreed Genesis
Posted on: 03/09/2010 23:31
@ninjafaery Agreed
Genesis 1, 2:7 "the LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. "
I love the German translation which translates "living being" with "soul."
But doesn't that mean that the human soul cannot be immortal by itself unless it is given eternal life? I like this idea. In fact, I believe in it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_conditionalism
I believe the idea of an immortal soul has no roots in the Bible, but rather is a result of Greek influence on Christianity.
Anyway. That would also mean that there is no hell, but rather that sinners simply are dead forever.
Neo
I would think that Genesis
Posted on: 03/10/2010 01:51
I would think that Genesis 2:7 simply means that with the breath of life man became a living being within the material world.
I don't see the soul as something that's created by our physical, emotional and mental experiences or something that is created upon our birth, (and kind of hangs around us during our life like some kind of balloon on a string, and only comes into play only when we die and sometimes only if we've been good enough or chosen in our lives).
Rather than the soul being a reflection of "us" I see us rather being a reflection of "soul", like a 3rd-dimensional shadow of a 4th-dimensional part of our Being. The soul gains experience and grows in awareness with each new life that it undertakes.
Awareness is the reflection of the Self, which is the soul, and through awareness we come to know ourselves. As we grow in awareness we eventually come be 'One with our Father'.
The soul is the consciousness aspect of our three-fold Being, life-consciousness-form. Or in another term, spirit-soul-personality. It's only on the personality level that we experience a sense of separation.
Our personality is in turn made up of three vehicles, the physical-emotional-mental bodies. These are "temples of the Lord", the forms through which consciousness expresses itself.
It's our constant identification with the personality that gives us the fear and loathing of death that we have. Death, however, is but the death of the form aspect of our being, it is not the death of the soul.
Upon death, the consciousness begins to withdraw its energy from the dense physical body, only to find itself on the astral (emotional) plane of nature. And depending on how we built this body up during our life time with our hopes, fears, aggressions, hatreds, etc., will depend of what type of thought forms need to be dissolved on this plane before the soul can move on. This is the "second death".
Hell is actually the hell of our own desires, our atrocities, the separations and grudges and fears that we've built up during our lives. This is why the teachers of our world have always taught us to control our thoughts and emotional reactions. We do have to face them them in the end.
Eventually the soul withdrawals it's energy from the astral plane and begins to experience the mental plane, a much more heavenly state than before. But this is also a temporary abode as the soul's true and natural state is in upper and formless side of the mental plane. This is the true "pralaya" or "devachan" where the soul lives in a non-mental, non-astral and non-material state of existence.
Devachan is a Sanskrit word that describes a "heavenly world where weary souls rest, refresh the spirit, and experience no pain in a spirit reality"
JRT
In some of the comments above
Posted on: 03/10/2010 08:07
In some of the comments above people have spoken of the 'soul' and the 'spirit' as being somehow different. This is a distinction that I really fail to comprehend.
Anyone up to trying to teach an old dog new tricks?
WaterBuoy
Like Einstein stated:
Posted on: 03/10/2010 08:27
Like Einstein stated: somethings are equivaent but different ... then mortals often don't see IT that way due to pressure put on them by divine authority that is mostly crap ... fecundity for learning?
Then we are told not to think by most powerful authorities ... as they have decided they will think for us as being on top of the pile. Problem is those on top can't see what supports them .. sort of a mind over matter enigma ... Xenos Paradox ... we don't know the other half of IT that keeps receding as a meek mind ... thin space that will inheret all this dirt when it bloes up in their face ... ruagh winds, or pneuma in LGK's context. Mneumonic?
Is intellect communicated in word and wee folk are mostly told to shut up ... don't ask, look, listen .... and for God's ache don't even think about ID ... most don't ... like a pain in space of the mind over manna. Did you know manna was considered unnatural, or supernatural in Polynesian tongues? Sort of like the wind causing ripples on the waters, but that could just be a deistic allegory! Condemned by the rigid stoics who like calm in their space ... dead minds walking ... Zoombeas?
Some times I take the whole thing as a joke on mortals by the powers above that are denied by m'n as thin space ... quick san on the beach ... Mir ligne! How many ways can ID be said ... let me count the ways? Isn't that multiply divine!
Neo
JRT wrote: In some of the
Posted on: 03/10/2010 09:40
In some of the comments above people have spoken of the 'soul' and the 'spirit' as being somehow different. This is a distinction that I really fail to comprehend.
Anyone up to trying to teach an old dog new tricks?
Spirit is another word for energy.
waterfall
So is the soul a living thing
Posted on: 03/10/2010 10:03
So is the soul a living thing that can die?
Here's something that comes from the Christodelphians. Are they close?
http://www.learnbible.net/soul.html
Arminius
Neo wrote: JRT wrote: In some
Posted on: 03/10/2010 13:57
In some of the comments above people have spoken of the 'soul' and the 'spirit' as being somehow different. This is a distinction that I really fail to comprehend.
Anyone up to trying to teach an old dog new tricks?
Spirit is another word for energy.
And energy can neither be created nor destroyed; IT only changes form. And IT is a singularity in a state of synthesis. And the transcendental and creative power to transform is an innate quality of energy. And we are IT, or an inseparable part of IT!
Beloved
To me, the soul is the part
Posted on: 03/10/2010 13:34
To me, the soul is the part of us that continues on forever, the part of us that is emotion and thought, the part of us that makes us uniquely us, the part of us that hungers for more than the world has to offer.
Greatest I am
The soul, and I believe we
Posted on: 03/10/2010 15:44
The soul, and I believe we have one that transcends this life, I will not speak to because it is not something that can be proven today. In the futere, who can say.
I have noted though that some believe the souls to be eternal.
Eternal comes straight from dogma and is unknowable.
Even for God to be able to say that He is eternal, he would have to know where or when the end of time is or if there is an end of time. In an endless universe, this is impossible.
my apotheosis though did show me that the soul can communicate with the Godhead.
It is not the miracle working super God that scripture has turned into a wish list but the one I found is more of a cosmic consciousness that I see as just our next evolutionary step.
See you all there.
Regards
DL
Neo
Arminius wrote: Neo
Posted on: 03/11/2010 00:55
In some of the comments above people have spoken of the 'soul' and the 'spirit' as being somehow different. This is a distinction that I really fail to comprehend.
Anyone up to trying to teach an old dog new tricks?
Spirit is another word for energy.
And energy can neither be created nor destroyed; IT only changes form. And IT is a singularity in a state of synthesis. And the transcendental and creative power to transform is an innate quality of energy. And we are IT, or an inseparable part of IT!
Exactly. What the scientist calls energy, the religious call God, or IT. Science has proven this fundamental axiom: that there is nothing in the whole of the manifested universe but energies, all of which are vibrating to a particular frequency and all of which interact.
Spirit is a word that is interchangeble with the word energy. It's in spirit is where God first manifests ITSelf into matter. And matter itself is recognized by science as "frozen energy".
There is nothing is our universe that is not spirit-energy.
Neo
waterfall wrote: So is the
Posted on: 03/11/2010 01:04
So is the soul a living thing that can die?
Here's something that comes from the Christodelphians. Are they close?
http://www.learnbible.net/soul.html
No, I don't believe that a soul can die. At least not in the sense that we think of being born and dying. First of all, time doesn't exist for the soul. The soul only experiences the never ending cyclic pulsations of "activity" and "non-activity".
Cycically, the soul meditates on that which it is a reflection of - the Monad or Spirit, and then again, cyclically, it turns its attention to it's own reflection, the human personality.
When the soul meditates on the Monad it's said to be in "pralaya", a state of existence where there's no impulse to incarnate. This is "devachan" and corresponds to the Christian idea of paradise.
When the soul focuses on it's form, then it's working on a spiritual evolution where awareness becomes the catalyst for change. Nothing can happen to the personality without the soul being aware.
When the soul breaths, the form lives nearby.
The goal for the soul is have it's own reflection mirror itself perfectly. This is the secret to the Great Renunciation, as the Buddhist call it. Since the soul is already (relatively) perfect on it's own plane of existence, then it becomes the supreme sacrifice by the personality to give itself up and become "One" with it's own soul.
To polish the mirror is to become One with God.
And the fastest and most direct way to polish this mirror (I believe) is through honesty of mind, sincerity of spirit and detachment. Regardless of your spiritual predisposition (or your lack thereof), living your life with these three attributes will bring you peace faster than any other approach.
waterfall
Hi Neo, I've always believed
Posted on: 03/11/2010 07:48
Hi Neo,
I've always believed that the soul is our connection to the divine, but I found it interesting in the site that I copied that they used the bible as their definition of the soul. And how it doesn't match up with our perception or reasonings of today. Especially the part that suggests our explanations today match more with the Greek explanation rather than the Bibles. And the part that Paul was trying to keep us from believing as the Greeks do?
I just wondered if we were all going off with our own personal interpretation and disregarding the Bibles or if the Christodelpians were completely wrong.
WaterBuoy
Heh, the modern
Posted on: 03/11/2010 08:15
Heh, the modern neurscientists and my old Webster says that the mind is all that surrounds the body of will ... is that approxomate in an indeterminate entitty? (soul/psyche)
Is there good reason for creation to isolate the spirit in hard form and use it for a GUI Neo Pi-Geo? Perhaps they would ask: "I wonder what that's for?" ... and a child of God was formulated as a pane in the As is ... existential vision?
The self-involved can't see ID they must get out amour ... fuzzy bean ... Ahazaih?
If yah look up daemon/damon ... you will find a definition of children of lesser Gods ...
It's a start!
WaterBuoy
Is that crazy, Anon-sense or
Posted on: 03/11/2010 08:29
Is that crazy, Anon-sense or just passion that'll screw up any sense of thinking body? That's along with the physical senses that is ... all 5! Penne duh tuck?
Look up in your concordance the number of times "fool" is represented in the holy bo'que ... perhaps It'll give yah a clue about Love/God and all those other extrenuous allegories! Did the vast creative force need entertainment while man was boring in space? Das mine ... like a blip in a void ... a' Gape'? Have reverence for the holy space ... the minds like that Ephraim'd in the west ... says so in the script! The mine is a happy thing if man would stop trying to bury it as an able bit of Anon-sense ... it'll jiggle if you allow it freedom!
Did you know that mnemonics states that man can learn nothing without a story and man hates stories in his seach for truth ... so he misses the whole point of IT all even people like Dawkins and Eve Angleicals! All for entertainment of the bored powers above ... Planque'd Constant?
Few will offer to walk such a flat road .... aftrer living a lifetime with man ... they don't trust a thing and will question all ... says so in the bo'que. Am'n isn't there yet .. accepting a great bunch by faith ... where it's just endless entanglement with sex and sects and man doen't know the difference in the wondering wobble ... like a wouffe on the loam ... wild weaving all about the truth which is not physically sensed ... something else eh?
unsafe
The soul to me is
Posted on: 03/11/2010 10:41
The soul to me is :
Dictionary meaning: (1)The animating and vital principle in humans, credited with the faculties of thought, action, and emotion and often conceived as an immaterial entity.
(2)an entity which is regarded as being the immortal or spiritual part of the person and, though having no physical or material reality, is credited with the functions of thinking and willing, and hence determining all behavior
So our Soul has 3 components:
(1) The Thinker --our thoughts
(2)The Chooser --our will to choose and act
(3)The Feeler ----our emotions to react
Our goal in life is for us to have control over all 3 components not to let them control us. --Hard to accomplish it takes must work and control to actually achieve the goal.
Blessings
boltupright
Arminius wrote: I think the
Posted on: 03/11/2010 12:58
I think the soul is our brain's memory body, which is being burned as a hologram into inverse space while we are alive, and stays there after the death of the physical body.
Wow, I wish I knew what that means! LOL
Sounds pretty cool non the less.
I believe that our soul has the ability to last forever.
Our bodies could last a very long time actually, but in this state of our condition our bodies are run down & worn prematurely due to the abuse of our bodies in many ways.
Some have been on this earth many times over & some not.
Our shell & the blood that runs through it creates an energy that binds the soul to the body, & when the energy of the body expires, the soul is free.
Free, until the next time if God so chooses to allow us to live again on this earth, or not.
Soon this age will be over & our souls will have new bodies that will not ever be at risk of damage.
Bolt
Arminius
waterfall wrote: Hi Neo, I've
Posted on: 03/11/2010 12:40
Hi Neo,
I've always believed that the soul is our connection to the divine, but I found it interesting in the site that I copied that they used the bible as their definition of the soul. And how it doesn't match up with our perception or reasonings of today. Especially the part that suggests our explanations today match more with the Greek explanation rather than the Bibles. And the part that Paul was trying to keep us from believing as the Greeks do?
I just wondered if we were all going off with our own personal interpretation and disregarding the Bibles or if the Christodelpians were completely wrong.
Hi waterfall:
Cosmos (a.k.a. God) as a self-creative singularity of energy is very experienceable but inexplicable in analytical terms and concepts. Our explanations of our experiences of God are necessarily metaphorical. The explanations of the ancient biblical prophets are as valid as those of modern day prophets, only that modern day prophets use terms of modern scientific philosophy to explain their experience of the Divine.
The modern explanations of the Divine do not render the ancient ones invalid—they confirm them! I think it is a mistake to regard either the ancient or the modern explanations as all-valid and absolutely true.
But I think the pure, unconceptualized experience of the Divine is absolutely true!
airclean33
Or Just Read
Posted on: 03/11/2010 13:34
Or Just Read ---Ecclesiastes-12-7 Here a very smart man knows more than I do. He's a king .
boltupright
airclean33 wrote: Or Just
Posted on: 03/11/2010 14:04
Or Just Read ---Ecclesiastes-12-7 Here a very smart man knows more than I do. He's a king .
Indeed a King.
The Spirit of this king leads to the King of kings.
Wonderful scripture indeed!!!
Bolt
Ichthys
I don't liek the idea of an
Posted on: 03/11/2010 15:20
I don't liek the idea of an immortal soul. If the soul is immortal where was it the last eternity before it got into a body and where is it going the next eternity without the body?
If the soul is immortal, why does it have to exist in a mortal body? It doesn't make sense becasue the immortality of the soul is an import of the Greek philosophy which I believe was a huge mistake because it makes human beigns look like God and it creates the illusion that we have to suffer an eternity for less or more than 100 years of sin. Thus the hell is a false doctrin of pagan origin.
Marzo
Time is not absolute so
Posted on: 03/11/2010 21:04
Time is not absolute so 'eternity' does not mean the same thing as'forever'. I think that 'eternity' is a transcendent level where 'beginning', 'ending' and time are not as we experience them. Living as we do in linear time it is difficult for us to conceive of something where time is not as we know it.
Neo
Arminius wrote: waterfall
Posted on: 03/12/2010 00:41
Hi Neo,
I've always believed that the soul is our connection to the divine, but I found it interesting in the site that I copied that they used the bible as their definition of the soul. And how it doesn't match up with our perception or reasonings of today. Especially the part that suggests our explanations today match more with the Greek explanation rather than the Bibles. And the part that Paul was trying to keep us from believing as the Greeks do?
I just wondered if we were all going off with our own personal interpretation and disregarding the Bibles or if the Christodelpians were completely wrong.
Hi waterfall:
Cosmos (a.k.a. God) as a self-creative singularity of energy is very experienceable but inexplicable in analytical terms and concepts. Our explanations of our experiences of God are necessarily metaphorical. The explanations of the ancient biblical prophets are as valid as those of modern day prophets, only that modern day prophets use terms of modern scientific philosophy to explain their experience of the Divine.
The modern explanations of the Divine do not render the ancient ones invalid—they confirm them! I think it is a mistake to regard either the ancient or the modern explanations as all-valid and absolutely true.
But I think the pure, unconceptualized experience of the Divine is absolutely true!
I like Arminius' explanation here and think science will eventually put this age old question to rest once and for all. Science will one day prove the existence of the human soul and therefore prove scientifically that we cannot die. This will likely come initially in the form of capturing high energy images of the human aura but will eventually lead to the actual discovery of the higher realms and the multidimensional aspects of our being.
The Christodelpians web site says that "GOD HIDES THE TRUTH FROM ALL BUT A FEW". This is very true and always has been. The mysteries of the Bible are tied up in myth and double meanings and sometimes only a Master of Wisdom can plumb the true depths of what is meant at it's deepest level.
I read once that the Bible is shallow enough for those who can't yet swim, yet deep enough for the largest whale in the ocean. With that said, however, the Bible has also fallen victim to interpretation, translation, re-interpretation and re-translation again, but perhaps this thread isn't the place for this discussion.
I don't believe these Christodelpians are completely wrong. They do, however, seem to have a strong separatist view of the world where only the readers and believers of the Bible are worthy of any type of salvation. It's a little too conservative for me.
I personally don't see why it would matter if I believed in an eternal soul or not, or whether I preferred to read theosophy over theology, or whether I even believed in God or not. These are not the things that we will be judged for (imho).
Upon the scales of justice will lie how we treated our fellow man or woman in our life. Were we honest in how we lived our life? Were we sincere in how we dealt with others? Did we dogmatically hang on to beliefs or emotions or material wealth to the extent that it made ourselves or others suffer? These are the things that matter. It won't be if you were a Christian or Muslim or what have you. These are man-made religions that are there to help us on the way. They are the means to the end, not the end themselves.
Sorry for soapboxing again folks, I tend to get a little passionate about these subjects.
Neo
Marzo wrote: Time is not
Posted on: 03/12/2010 00:38
Time is not absolute so 'eternity' does not mean the same thing as'forever'. I think that 'eternity' is a transcendent level where 'beginning', 'ending' and time are not as we experience them. Living as we do in linear time it is difficult for us to conceive of something where time is not as we know it.
Agreed. Time and space is an illusion that occurs because we live in a physical and 3D world. Time doesn't exist in the higher planes. Our goal is to tune into, or become "one" with the higher aspect our Selves and experience the "bliss" of no-time, no-space.
Father time is associated with the Greek god Chronos, the Grim Reaper. Time is what limits and restricts us from seeing the greater reality.
Time is the teacher that forces us to learn to be souls in a material world, for in time all of us will eventually become perfect, even as our Father in Heaven is perfect.
WaterBuoy
Is the soul something we are
Posted on: 03/12/2010 09:45
Is the soul something we are supposed to learn about?
Then I've been told by many that life is not for learning but loving, so we screw ourselves senseless and it falls down around us.
Perhaps it would take many cycles of life to get people to learn ... thsu the immortal soul ... hommoe of the mind, heart and all the tiye that binds it together in a word ... God ... infnite?
Who woulda rote such a satyr? Its beyond me1
Neo
Perhaps life is for learning
Posted on: 03/13/2010 00:24
Perhaps life is for learning about love. Isn't love all about unity? Isn't soul consciousness about discovering that there is no real separation between us? Isn't that love?
ninjafaery
Neo wrote: Perhaps life is
Posted on: 03/13/2010 05:43
Perhaps life is for learning about love. Isn't love all about unity? Isn't soul consciousness about discovering that there is no real separation between us? Isn't that love?
joejack
Normal 0 Wow.
Posted on: 03/13/2010 08:09
Normal
0
Wow. Coming up with one definition of ‘soul’ is like trying to nail Jell-O to a wall. If you check out Wikipedia under ‘soul’, you’ll discover a broad range of views that vary even within the same religious movement. As a place to start, you could go to the following internet address: http://www.scribd.com/doc/14803927/THE-SOUL-A-BIBLICAL-PERSPECTIVE. From there, you can branch out to other definitions and views on this topic. It’s far too massive a topic to cover in one posting on Wondercafe or any other forum. Happy hunting.
ShamanWolf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Posted on: 03/13/2010 09:58
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9JB2ETgatI
So wait - no-one's willing to speak of the soul as a purely metaphysical entity. But everyone keeps saying it's a sort of synthesis of 'body' and 'spirit' - body being entirely physical, and 'spirit', implicitly, metaphysical. So what the hell is 'spirit' then?
I personally think of 'soul' as consciousness, divorced from its causes. A lot of scientists say 'consciousness' is a purely physical, chemical phenomenon. I would say it is caused by a physical phenomenon, but becomes something transcendent. Not metaphysical, or separated from the body - I very much doubt it outlasts the body (its 'power source') as well - but essentially undefinable, in the sense that the most you can define it - which would probably be defining it by its causes, or by its workings (psychology) - can still never come close to summing it up, as an EXPERIENCE.
Ichthys: I'd like to see a pagan religion with a notion of 'hell' nearly as defined as the monotheist one.
Well, there is the Greek Tartarus, I suppose. But the idea that 'if you're bad, you will go to hell' was never as important a means of keeping people in line in pagan religions as it is in monotheistic ones.
That's partly because pagan religions kind of arose naturally out of societies, and reflected the memes and taboos of those societies, rather than trying to impose an elite's written set of rules.
Arminius
Neo wrote: Perhaps life is
Posted on: 03/13/2010 11:41
Perhaps life is for learning about love. Isn't love all about unity? Isn't soul consciousness about discovering that there is no real separation between us? Isn't that love?
This, indeed, is UNITIVE LOVE!

boltupright
(No subject)
Posted on: 03/13/2010 11:58
Marzo
Arminius wrote: Neo
Posted on: 03/13/2010 12:19
Perhaps life is for learning about love. Isn't love all about unity? Isn't soul consciousness about discovering that there is no real separation between us? Isn't that love?
This, indeed, is UNITIVE LOVE!

When we contemplate the nature of the soul we also have to raise questions about the nature of evil.
boltupright
Marzo wrote: Arminius
Posted on: 03/13/2010 12:28
Perhaps life is for learning about love. Isn't love all about unity? Isn't soul consciousness about discovering that there is no real separation between us? Isn't that love?
This, indeed, is UNITIVE LOVE!

When we contemplate the nature of the soul we also have to raise questions about the nature of evil.
Well it is the naure of evil that separates is it not?
If God can forgive anyone of anything, what does this tell us?
I says to me, that there is absolutely no excuse for there to be division any longer.
Bolt
Marzo
boltupright wrote: Marzo
Posted on: 03/13/2010 13:03
Perhaps life is for learning about love. Isn't love all about unity? Isn't soul consciousness about discovering that there is no real separation between us? Isn't that love?
This, indeed, is UNITIVE LOVE!

When we contemplate the nature of the soul we also have to raise questions about the nature of evil.
Well it is the naure of evil that separates is it not?
If God can forgive anyone of anything, what does this tell us?
I says to me, that there is absolutely no excuse for there to be division any longer.
Bolt
boltupright
Wow, great call on that
Posted on: 03/13/2010 13:06
Bolt
footprints165
What is a soul? It's the mind
Posted on: 03/13/2010 13:10
What is a soul? It's the mind and body's bodyguard, the moral compass that keeps us alive and healthy.
Perhaps it's nothing more than a sentient being's evolved animal instinct. Because we're capable of thinking, creating, rationalizing and planning, our instincts to survive had to evolve as well, and thus became the Soul, the ultimate survival instinct that sees past immediate flight or fight responses and considers future consequences on an emotional and social level rather than just physical level alone.
And considering we are social creatures, it would make sense that our souls are all connected. Like all animals who live in packs, we need social instincts to understand the functioning of our social environment and we seek social harmony. But we are evolved, intelligent, capable of communication and much more than just meeting our immediate social needs - our souls unite to decide common experiences we judge favourable or disfavourable, social laws of conduct and rules to promote harmony. Do not murder or assault another person's life physically or mentally are the most common moral rules found everywhere for a reason - because it promotes and protects everyone's well-being .
So why all the cruelty if we have the ability to think morally? Because evolution is a slow process. Just because you know how to drive at age 16 doesn't mean you're an able driver. It takes years or experience to master an ability - human beings haven't matured enough to master our Souls yet.
Neo
Marzo wrote: Arminius
Posted on: 03/14/2010 13:46
Perhaps life is for learning about love. Isn't love all about unity? Isn't soul consciousness about discovering that there is no real separation between us? Isn't that love?
This, indeed, is UNITIVE LOVE!

When we contemplate the nature of the soul we also have to raise questions about the nature of evil.
It all depends on your point of view. The separation occurs on the peripheral of the wheel, where our personalities reside in time and space. At the centre there is peace and the understanding that the whole works as One. This is the heart of consciousness.
Evil is everything that looks away from God. In life we find that we are either on the involutionary and downward facing road or we are on the evolutionary and upward facing road.
Like the in-breathing and the out-breathing of the soul so our personality looks either forwards or backwards.
Pilgrims Progress
Marzo wrote: There is a lot
Posted on: 03/13/2010 16:26
There is a lot of very real separation and alienation in this world. There is separation that causes senseless cruelty, war, destruction, and that could lead to global disaster sooner than we think. I can't accept the statement, "there is no real separation between us". It is very real.
Perhaps there are two distinct ways of being in this world.
One way is real, the other an illusion.
The way of illusion is to see the world through the narrow confines of the ego. ie. it's all about me.
This is the way of separation and fear. It is the way seen on our television screens - in both news items and advertising.
The way of reality is to see the world as one living organism - where everything and everyone is connected. As individuals we are not separate, but part of a wondrous whole.
This is the way of unity and love.
The choice is ours. All it takes is a shift in perception. Find the courage to make that shift - and perhaps you'll come closer to experiencing more fully the wonder of life.
Arminius
Separation is an illusion.
Posted on: 03/14/2010 02:36
Separation is an illusion. Unfortunately, many of us believe this illusion to be real. And, when we believe it to be real, then it becomes real for those of us who believe so.
The illusion of separation is the worst and most destructive of our many illusions.
To rid ourselves of the illusion of separateness, and experience the unity and oneness that underlies all being, is, or ought to be, our ultimate aim in life.
Pilgrims Progress
Ah, Arminius, I can see your
Posted on: 03/14/2010 03:04
Ah, Arminius, I can see your time spent in Oz wasn't wasted.
It's amazing how much clarity a Barossa red affords one!
WaterBuoy
What is an unbound love? It
Posted on: 03/14/2010 07:51
What is an unbound love?
It is dangerous ... without a clue! Some call this the ignorance felt while falling .... you just don't know what ...
Is it good to be sentient about you love's effect on the neighbour? Perhaps not if you would like to deny what you've done has screwed up the neighbour's life so that you could be better, and richer!
Ever hear that: "I'm good, I'm rich!" The conclusion doesn't always ring clear ...
Should one take care of the neighbour, that alien sort next door? Perhap it is good to set an example in case he learns from your past behaviour much better than you thought he would. You might then find yourself consumed, and digested ... so much fecundity for another cycle ... that's life in the real lane eh? Perhaps the metaphysical lane needs some attention ... for what it can shed to the earth as fallout ... the fall of man? Milton, Dante' you folk do have a grand sense of satire ...
Could we possibly learn something from that passing oddity we call Theo ... Th'aught in short supply ... in a fast world. Would a slowdown be beneficial ... like retreat to the wilderness as Yom Kippor ... basket cases under the moon'n dark Skye ... one cool fat, black laid-E ... thas movein experience ...
Marzo
So Arminius and Pilgrims
Posted on: 03/14/2010 07:59
So Arminius and Pilgrims Progress are saying that war, various forms of slavery, greed and all the destructiveness that plagues the world are "illusions".
You must be very enlightened and blessed to know that none of that is real and that clarity can be found in a bottle of wine.
Arminius
Marzo wrote: So Arminius and
Posted on: 03/14/2010 11:39
So Arminius and Pilgrims Progress are saying that war, various forms of slavery, greed and all the destructiveness that plagues the world are "illusions".
You must be very enlightened and blessed to know that none of that is real and that clarity can be found in a bottle of wine.
Now, now, Marzo, don't be facetious! Go and live in the Land of Oz for a while, and you'll learn to appreciate and perhaps even love those Aussies and their brand of humour.
Seriously, now. The destructiveness that plagues the world is not an illusion, but I think it is a direct outcome of the illusion of separation.
Of all that one should care to fathom, I
Was never deep in anything but—wine.
-Omar Khayyam
This "wine," of course, is the heady spiritual wine that Jesus and others poured.