For those of you that have been leading worship and preaching for many years, how many times would you say that you preach on the story of the Good samaritan?
How do you get excited to tell this story and others over and over?
How do you find new and different ways of looking at it?
Are there always those in the congregation who are just hearing it for the first time?
Just wondering........
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada

Comments
graeme
I've certainly used it. My
Posted on: 06/21/2010 15:29
I've certainly used it. My sense is that most in the congregation hear it as a "good thing" without really grasping its meaning in their own lives. For that reason, I try to tell the story in today's context. I remember using a local church with a huge sign that said "support our troops". My feeling was it had completely missed the point of the good samartian story, and of most of the New Testament.
If the congregation does not hear it in a new way, does not connect with its own lives, the reading is wasted.
redbaron338
I've used it several times
Posted on: 06/21/2010 16:34
I've used it several times over the years, and can remember at least a couple of different emphases around it. It\s a bit exciting, because I'm telling them a familiar story, and highlighting parts of it they may never have realized were there before. It's an educational experience for them to hear those points, and educational (not to say a lot of fun) for me to find them. I once modernized the story, for example, with a Minister, an Elder, and a bike gang member. That was fun.
Gotta say I agree with Graeme (gasp!
) about the Support thing, too.
seeler
It comes around in the
Posted on: 06/21/2010 18:15
It comes around in the lectionary every three years so I've probably preached on it every so often if I'm called to lead a service at that time. Sometimes though I might use another of the readings for my main focus. A few years ago I was probably focusing the sermon elsewhere when I used the Good Samaritan as a children's story.
I used a local setting, modern day situation. A child is riding her bike to school, going down a walking path. Suddenly two bullies attack, knocking her down, hurting her leg, damaging her bike, and stealing her lunch money. She lies there crying as a group of teenagers, including the girl who sometimes babysits, come down the path - chatting about the weekend. She calls to them, but just then somebody shouts that their bus is coming. They continue on their way. A man comes out of a nearby house. She calls to him, he pauses, then throws his briefcase into the car, gets in and drives away to a meeting. Then along comes Derick. She knows Derick. He's in her class. He is always getting into trouble, he doesn't sit still and listen, he gets his work wrong, he annoys people at recess - he is such a pest. Everybody is glad when his TA takes him out of the class for awhile. But he stops, he helps her up, offers to push her bike with its broken spokes, and he offers to share his money with her so that she can buy a hot dog at lunch. Who is the neighbour?
I've also told the story with a woman victim, or a woman in the good samaritan role. I try to find something new and different in it each time I tell it. Jesus' parables had many layers.
crazyheart
This is interesting The
Posted on: 06/21/2010 19:05
This is interesting
The Parable of the Good Samaritan, - how modern audiences often miss a key point of the story: The 1st Century Jewish target audience of the Parable loathed Samaritans, and the feeling was mutual. So, charity was not the sole point of the story; the point was also that someone who would have been expected to be least likely to help was the one who helped.
A Modern Version
A good, right thinking American conservative was visiting Washington, DC to attend CPAC. The conservative did not have his gun with him, since he followed the city's unjust gun laws. He was set upon by robbers and left for dead.
An NRA member drove by in a Lincoln Navigator and noticed his plight, but thought, "well, if he had been carrying a gun, he would have been able to defend himself. He deserves his fate." He sped away to the NRA headquarters off I-66 to have dinner at the restaurant there.
Then, a pro-life activist walked by, but she said to herself, "he's an adult and can take care of himself. I have to go save defenseless little babies." She picked up her picket sign and headed to that day's protest at Planned Parenthood.
But, a gay liberal drove by in his Prius, and saw the conservative, and took pity on him. He folded down the back seat, to allow plenty of room for the wounded conservative to lie down. He then drove him to the hospital, where he was admitted to the emergency room.
The admissions nurse told the liberal that the conservative didn't have health insurance. The liberal pulled out his Greenpeace logo MasterCard and said "let him stay till he's fully recovered; don't kick him out as soon as you legally can." He then called some of his other liberal friends, and they held a bake sale at the organically-grown locally-raised food co-op to to raise money to pay the conservative's bills.
When the conservative left the hospital, he learned the man who saved him was gay, so he went to get an AIDS test because he thought all gays carried AIDS and it was spread by casual contact. He then started calling all of his favorite talk radio shows, blaming liberal social values for his mugging.
So was the man in the ditch a good neighbour?
waterfall
Ah, good one Crazyheart. Nice
Posted on: 06/21/2010 19:28
Ah, good one Crazyheart. Nice twist to the story.
The other thing is, if charity were anonymous, we wouldn't have to know who was what would we? The focus would only be that we should help.
graeme
delightful and absolutely
Posted on: 06/21/2010 19:42
delightful and absolutely untoppable.
seeler
I think it is important to
Posted on: 06/21/2010 19:44
I think it is important to remember that the Samaritans and the Jews shared much the same heritage. They weren't hating strangers, but their own cousins.
And yes, I think it is always important to remember that this story is about relationships between peoples, rather than just a nice story about being kind and loving.
GRR
crazyheart wrote: the man who
Posted on: 06/21/2010 20:56
the man who saved him was gay, so he went to get an AIDS test because he thought all gays carried AIDS and it was spread by casual contact. He then started calling all of his favorite talk radio shows, blaming liberal social values for his mugging.
Interesting take. In the biblical account, we never do hear whether the man who was beaten was grateful or not, do we?
For me, this is never a "stand alone" story, since it's written as an example of how to live out the agapé expressed in the preceding passages when the writer has Jesus respond to "what is the greatest commandment?"
crazyheart
I was waitng for you, David.
Posted on: 06/21/2010 22:14
I was waitng for you, David.
crazyheart
Any other thoughts?
Posted on: 06/22/2010 10:57
Any other thoughts?
GRR
crazyheart wrote: I was
Posted on: 06/22/2010 12:08
I was waitng for you, David.
hmmm - a cyberstalker eh??
Let me try to expand a little later today. Sorry, I'm still trying to limit my "screen-staring time"
Panentheism
Crazy heart's quote gets at
Posted on: 06/22/2010 12:25
Crazy heart's quote gets at the issue - remember Luke softens the parable with who is my neighbor - and the great commendent which adds love your enemy - note not all religions addd this - They were enemies even if cousins - I like to tell as a NDP comes to the aid of Harper to get at the radical nature of the parable or vice versa - it is very demanding parable and we soften it by being a good neighbor - it is the enemy who is. That is never the expectation that justice and compassion will come from the enemy.
revjohn
Hi crazyheart, crazyheart
Posted on: 06/22/2010 12:28
Hi crazyheart,
For those of you that have been leading worship and preaching for many years, how many times would you say that you preach on the story of the Good samaritan?
A few times I think. I try to wander outside of the selected Gospel readings that the lectionary assigns. I mean, if one only preaches the lectionary readings one is repeating the readings every three years. Rotating the preaching among the four texts assigned to each day means that it would take 12 years to preach to every text in the lectionary.
That should keep things fresh.
How do you get excited to tell this story and others over and over?
How can you not? What an amazing parable! I love that ending, "Go and do likewise!"
How do you find new and different ways of looking at it?
Why do you need new and different? Folk get it read to them once every three years. If one sermon in that time was all that was needed to transform lives then the Kingdom would have been realized generations ago.
Are there always those in the congregation who are just hearing it for the first time?
Just wondering........
If not then there may be some that it is just sinking in for the first time.
Grace and peace to you.
John
GRR
crazyheart wrote: Any other
Posted on: 06/22/2010 22:27
Any other thoughts?
Well, since you asked ...
Here's a link to three articles I've done on Good Samaritan-related themes over the years.
The Good Samaritan.. was a Fool, and other thoughts
I'd love to deliver a sermon on any of them, even though I see the story as more tightly bound to the concept of agapé the longer I contemplate it.
By that, I mean that it's the illustration of what it means to actually live out this radical inclusiveness that we find in the NT gospels.
Now that you've got me on the topic, I hope to write a fourth installment. Not in time to help you if this is for an upcoming sermon of course, but maybe you'll find something of value in one those above.
DAvid
crazyheart
Thanks david. I will read
Posted on: 06/23/2010 09:21
Thanks david. I will read them for sure.