Well Ontario is earning its title again as the corrupt, wayward province of Canada.
Soon Ontarians will be looking at busses with the advertisement "There's probably no God"
We can't write on a bus "There's probably no Allah " 'cause that might offend the Moslums. We can't write on a bus "There's probably no Buddha" 'cause that would offen the Buddhists but Christianity does not matter we can write publicly on a bus "there's probably no God" because the Christians in Ontario won't do a thing.
Read all about the new ad campaign here:
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada

Comments
Pinga
(I should probably say
Posted on: 01/30/2009 22:41
(I should probably say why....we had 160 folks laid off this week. Honestly, I don't care if you believe in God or not...but, I do care what are your thoughts around those people.)
Democritus
Regarding the claim that the
Posted on: 01/31/2009 16:37
Regarding the claim that the ad attacks Christianity and avoids, say, Islam, if you look at the actual ad, the word "god" isn't capitalized (well, more accurately, the entire word, in fact the entire phrase, is capitalized). So there's nothing in the ad that refers specifically to Christianity at all.
As an aside, if you are a Christian, you believe in only one possible god of all the documented gods (God, Allah, Shiva, Zeus, Odin, Ra, ...). Atheists just believe in one less god than you do.
Democritus
RevMatt wrote: I have to say,
Posted on: 01/31/2009 16:36
I have to say, though, that while your quote is cute, the worldview it espouses is both arrogant and intolerant. The smug view that only that which can be expressed within the narrow confines of what you recognise as true is hardly conducive to the development of a civilised society.
Speaking as an atheist, I come from a position of annoyed tolerance. I would be more than happy to let religious people have their views and let me have mine, perhaps engaging in meaningless debates or teasing now and then as I do with Leafs fans, but frankly it has been religious people that won't tolerate that situation. Despite how blatantly ridiculous the various religions are, if you all could stay out of our lives, we'd be happy to stay out of yours.
And yes, I said blatantly ridiculous. Religion as a way of determining the way nature works is painfully inaccurate. Religion as a way of learning morals and philosophy is deeply flawed, you'd be better off sticking with more educated teachers like Democritus and Epicurus if you insist on sticking with sources thousands of years old. Religion is a great way of getting together, sharing your company with others, singing some songs and espousing shared beliefs about how to best live one's lives, but you could do it without the books and the belief in the supernatural and it'd work a lot better.
Birthstone
Democritus - welcome to the
Posted on: 01/31/2009 17:09
Democritus - welcome to the cafe. I mostly agree with you, though my experience of the Divine probably puts a bit of a different twist on your ideas. And yes, I know a bunch of bible stories, but my experience of church has included readings by various others - from other faiths, and also no faith experience. We have learned from all of them. Now, my background has framed it in a Jesus perspective, but many of us have railed against conservative Christian viewpoints too ( see the flat spot on my forehead?). (oh, and there are some really cool friends here who are conservative Christian of one sort or another)
Add your views to the mix, and it becomes part of our journey of understanding, My journey still includes something divine, though not oppressive. Maybe my views, and those of other WC'rs will give you stuff to think about too.
RevMatt
Democritus wrote: Speaking as
Posted on: 01/31/2009 22:42
Speaking as an atheist, I come from a position of annoyed tolerance. I would be more than happy to let religious people have their views and let me have mine, perhaps engaging in meaningless debates or teasing now and then as I do with Leafs fans, but frankly it has been religious people that won't tolerate that situation.
Fair enough. I am well aware of the nasty things done in the name of my faith, and not at all pleased about it or proud of them. If it helps, the kind of people who would give you grief tend to consider me and the UCC as a whole to be false Christians, and they are at least as annoying to us as they are to you :)
And we can absolutely agree on the importance of teasing Leaf's fans.
Arminius
Hi Democritus: Wasn't the
Posted on: 02/01/2009 02:06
Hi Democritus: Wasn't the ancient Democritus sort of a spiritual philosopher? All I remember about him is that he taught that atoms were the smallest buiding blocks of matter—two thousand years before modern science discovered atoms!
Spiritual but not religious, eh, like many people today.
momsfruitcake
birthstone: love the new
Posted on: 02/01/2009 11:00
birthstone: love the new avatar.
democritus: are you spiritual? if so, what does spirituality mean to you?
InannaWhimsey
"To be playful is not to be
Posted on: 02/01/2009 19:56
"To be playful is not to be trivial or frivolous, or to act as if nothing of consequence will happen. On the contrary, when we are playful with one another, we relate as free persons, and the relationship is open to surprise; _everything_ that happens is of consequence, for seriousness is a dread of the unpredictable outcome of open possibility. To be serious is to press for a specified conclusion. To be playful is to allow for unlimited possibility."
--James Carse
Bless these groups for encouraging others to, as I've written before, make their own ads. Just imagine:
Visnu is watching, look busy.
God loves homosexuals. And heterosexuals. And dog-lovers.
All Hail Discordia!
Your God doesn't exist. And exists. And both exists and doesn't exist. So have a good time.
Wotan dug out his own eye and hung himself from a tree for YOU.
Hoka Hey! Everything came out of a clam!
The Bible is very sexy pornography. Read it and GET IT ON.
Cthulhu is coming! Say your prayers.
Who is the Master who makes the grass green?
Again, I thank them for the encouragement and the willingness to play,
Inannawhimsey
elisabeth
Apparently the United Church
Posted on: 02/01/2009 20:52
Apparently the United Church is going to enter into the fray with a counter ad that says Apparently there is a God so go and enjoy your Life. What does everyone think? Is this a good idea? I have to say that when I took a review of the gospels course at my local University I was really surprised that there were young people in my class who had no belief in the Spirit at all. In the United Church we say "We are not alone ...." I think that is very important. I felt profoundly sorry for those kids as they were left alone, having to deal with all of their problems and grief by themselves without the knowlege that God was there to support them through the bad times. So do you think that it is a good idea for the United Church to get involved in this ad compaign and be provocative and say "There probably is a God so go and enjoy your Life".
Atheisto
elisabeth wrote: Apparently
Posted on: 02/01/2009 21:15
Apparently the United Church is going to enter into the fray with a counter ad that says Apparently there is a God so go and enjoy your Life. What does everyone think? Is this a good idea? I have to say that when I took a review of the gospels course at my local University I was really surprised that there were young people in my class who had no belief in the Spirit at all. In the United Church we say "We are not alone ...." I think that is very important. I felt profoundly sorry for those kids as they were left alone, having to deal with all of their problems and grief by themselves without the knowlege that God was there to support them through the bad times. So do you think that it is a good idea for the United Church to get involved in this ad compaign and be provocative and say "There probably is a God so go and enjoy your Life".
Those people probably felt sorry for you that you had to manifest an imaginary friend in order to cope with your problems. I wouldn't worry about them.
chansen
Elizabeth, I think it is a
Posted on: 02/01/2009 21:30
Elizabeth, I think it is a much more difficult thing to say that there "probably is a god". For that, you have to assume there is some sort of evidence to support this conclusion, but there just isn't. You have a lot of people who "walk with God" or "feel his presense", but that just doesn't strike me as reason enough for "probably is a god". What you have is a lot of people who really, really want god to exist, and who believe he does exist, and that's great. It just doesn't mean he "probably" exists.
I think you'll find more and more secularists looking to learn about religious scriptures, so I don't think your class was an anomaly. The bible is one of the most influencial and quoted pieces of literature, period. I've only read parts, but the bible is high on the list of things I want to read this summer. Having never been religious, I can identify with your classmates you felt sorry for, and I think your sympathy is misplaced. Not everyone feels the need for supernatural consolation in hard times.
GadZooks
Atheisto - I think you might
Posted on: 02/01/2009 23:33
Atheisto - I think you might have crossed the line this time. Let's try to keep it constructive. This is, after all, supposed to be a safe place to discuss how we feel.
Atheisto
GadZooks wrote: Atheisto -
Posted on: 02/01/2009 23:39
Atheisto - I think you might have crossed the line this time. Let's try to keep it constructive. This is, after all, supposed to be a safe place to discuss how we feel.
No. When someone says they feel pity for the unbeliever I think that actually shows as much lack of tact as my response. My response was accurate. For every fervent religious type that pities the unsaved soul there is an atheist that wonders why people need to believe in imaginary friends.
If you say you have a personal relationship with god...but this god can never be seen then you shouldn't be too surprised when you encounter this language.
If I said I have a personal relationship with a twenty legged floating elephant wearing a pineapple hat that reads my thoughts and occasionally acts on them, comforts me and cares for me and guides my life and the only reason you can't see him is that you're not open to the thought of such a thing....then I think I might expect a little, how shall we say, frank language.
GadZooks
Hmm, maybe you have a point
Posted on: 02/02/2009 00:06
Hmm, maybe you have a point there.
You must admit, however, that you are at times a little less than tactful yourself?
I personally think you maybe went a little far with someone who has yet to provoke you. You could have been kind and perhaps helped elisabeth understand how what she said made you feel, but instead you attacked back. I don't think that's an acceptable or helpful approach, personally. You have your right to disagree, but I implore you - make us understand. Don't just attack.
chansen
I identify with what Atheisto
Posted on: 02/02/2009 01:14
I identify with what Atheisto is saying - I tried to be nicer about it, but it was very diffucult and I have a bruise on my lip from biting it. Writing that you "feel sorry" for atheists is as tactless as what Atheisto wrote, and it always has been.
InannaWhimsey
I'd like to say... Look at
Posted on: 02/02/2009 04:20
I'd like to say...
Look at what happens when we assume things: Atheisto's "imaginary friend", chansen's "Writing that you 'feel sorry' for atheists" and so forth...
We abrogate responsibility for our personal B.S. (belief system) and the feelings that arise from them. We say "My concept exists, so I am not responsible for it..." Pleh to that thinking, I say :3
Elisabeth, I've felt sorry as well -- sorry when I see people not able to believe something that I think is pretty keen, sorry for myself when I can't believe in something like sombunall versions of G_d (because it would be SO easy), sorry for people when I see them not able to see past their own B.S., sorry when I'm feeling all hot n transcendent and on a "Hey, everyone should be feeling this way..." kick.
But I've got to be careful not to assume how others are feeling or processing their experiences. Just like I can't assume that just because someone is a Christian, they are happy (just look at Mom Teresa) or just because someone doesn't believe in a G_d doesn't mean that they are an 'atheist' and so on :3
I think the ad is good -- especially when all involved DON'T TAKE IT LITERALLY. Those that do (the ones that say G_d doesn't exist and that G_d does exist) can go play in their own little corners while the rest of us, the ones who know what's going on, can have fun with it :3
(Part of me would love to see Sophisticated Realism being taught in schools...then at least we'd all be in some sort of control of our fictions)
Onward the imagination,
Inannawhimsey
stardust
I wonder how many churched or
Posted on: 02/02/2009 02:18
I wonder how many churched or Christian people live in a community that happens to have a lot of atheists? I do. How many actually know some atheists quite personally? I do. The ones I've met and talked to daily for some years were parents at my grandson's school. I found them to be caring loving family people. I might add I don't feel the need to get into God discussions with people in general. We talked, we laughed, we had fun. That's all I know!
The_Omnissiah
Eurika! The reason people
Posted on: 02/02/2009 02:42
Eurika! The reason people can't get along is because of assertations of superiority!! Both from the Theist and Atheist blocs.
So lets treat each other like equals, and not stereotype shall we?
As-Salaamu Alaikum
-Omni
LBmuskoka
The_Omnissiah wrote: So lets
Posted on: 02/02/2009 07:29
So lets treat each other like equals, and not stereotype shall we?
Omni, patent, trademark and put that on a bus my friend and you will own the way to world peace.
LB
The peace I am thinking of is the dance of an open mind when it engages another equally open one. Toni Morrison
Birthstone
chansen wrote: The bible is
Posted on: 02/02/2009 08:22
Welcome Chansen
Oh dear! reading the bible from page 1 to last page is painful!! just wait until the 'begats', and then there are the brain twisters that are so out of context without the historical stuff, you'll run far far away. It was written by a whole bunch of people at different times in history, in several different styles, including simple historical records. Not made for cover to cover reading. Its more like a compilation of stuff that describes the history of the Jews as they came to understand the Divine.
Better to try it with some sort of study book - I can't name one, but lots of people here can (consider a few sources - because liberal & conservative readings are wildly differernt). And then there is the idea that I grew up with that, we read it in pieces & parts over the years with exploration happening alongside.
Birthstone
momsfruitcake - thanks
Posted on: 02/02/2009 08:23
momsfruitcake - thanks
momsfruitcake
The_Omnissiah wrote: Eurika!
Posted on: 02/02/2009 09:16
Eurika! The reason people can't get along is because of assertations of superiority!! Both from the Theist and Atheist blocs.
So lets treat each other like equals, and not stereotype shall we?
As-Salaamu Alaikum
-Omni
amen
Bassic
Omni, I agree. I've spent
Posted on: 02/02/2009 11:36
Omni, I agree. I've spent some time on the atheist bus site, but it is a bit uncomfortable. I'm a Professional Engineer. I'm a science geek. I read two magazines The Observer and New Scientist, a weekly the size of McLean's.
So the assertion that people of faith are weak minded, particularly in scientific fields, cuts pretty deep. (Funny, my orignal post had "week minded", I guess I deserve the title
)
I guess they don't know that it was Muslim scholars and doctors who brought us much of the science, math and medicine we use today. (I'll leave out the part about the christians opressing it during the same period
).
Thanks Omni!
Arminius
Hi Inanna: You shouldn't
Posted on: 02/02/2009 10:58
Hi Inanna:
You shouldn't abreviate belief system as B.S. It always makes me think of that other B.S.
I agree, of course, that belief systems are part of our illusiory world of concepts, also known as "Maia" in the Far East.
To me, however, the world of concepts is not an illusion but a creation, which means much the same, but "creation" sounds so much nicer and more positive than "B.S." or "illusion," doesn't it?
Your B.S. Artist,
Arminius
Birthstone
Arminius wrote: Hi
Posted on: 02/02/2009 12:19
Hi Inanna:
You shouldn't abreviate belief system as B.S. It always makes me think of that other B.S.
Your B.S. Artist,
Arminius
somebody talking about me??
Atheisto
Bassic wrote: Omni,
Posted on: 02/02/2009 12:49
Omni, I agree. I've spent some time on the atheist bus site, but it is a bit uncomfortable. I'm a Professional Engineer. I'm a science geek. I read two magazines The Observer and New Scientist, a weekly the size of McLean's.
So the assertion that people of faith are weak minded, particularly in scientific fields, cuts pretty deep. (Funny, my orignal post had "week minded", I guess I deserve the title
)
I guess they don't know that it was Muslim scholars and doctors who brought us much of the science, math and medicine we use today. (I'll leave out the part about the christians opressing it during the same period
).
Thanks Omni!
..and their religion had diddly squat to do with those advancements they brought about.
Democritus
Arminius wrote: Hi
Posted on: 02/02/2009 13:11
Hi Democritus: Wasn't the ancient Democritus sort of a spiritual philosopher? All I remember about him is that he taught that atoms were the smallest buiding blocks of matter—two thousand years before modern science discovered atoms!
Spiritual but not religious, eh, like many people today.
Democritus used a non-scientific method to accurately predict the existence of atoms, that's correct. To an extent, he was largely just using educated guesswork, but to be fair to him, the scientific method hadn't been discovered yet, the view at the time was the proper way to figure out how the universe worked was to apply pure reasoning. He did apply rudimentary scientific techniques in his biological and geological work. He held an evolutionary view of human beings, pre-Darwin, of course. Given the primitive methods he was using, he was astonishingly accurate.
His ethical beliefs also continue to be applicable today, 2000 years and later. He believed in equality, believed that the ability of money to make you happy was very limited (something Epicurus would later expound on), believed that freedom was more important than prosperity, wanted to limit violence but still had a very realistic view of it, believed in education, moderation and hard, honest work and the value of laughter.
He was spiritual, but to the smallest extent someone of his times could realistically have been.
He was by no means perfect, but if I was to pick a single philosopher upon which to found my beliefs (something I would never, ever do), I would probably pick him.
Democritus
momsfruitcake
Posted on: 02/02/2009 13:19
democritus: are you spiritual? if so, what does spirituality mean to you?
That depends entirely on what you mean by spiritual. I wouldn't define myself as spiritual, no, in the sense that I don't believe there is such a thing as a soul or the supernatural. Don't get me wrong, I think it would be great if I could live forever or if I had magical powers or things along those lines, but the likelihood of those things being true is, in my view, so infinitesimally small that it would be ridiculous to live my life as if they were true. I live my life in the virtual certainty that its over when I die and I need to get all I can out of the life I have. I try to live my life the way I think would make the world the best possible place if everyone acted the same way. Note the word 'possible', I try to have very realistic expectations about what human beings are actually like and what we are capable of, the good and the bad.
momsfruitcake
democritus: gotcha. thanks :)
Posted on: 02/02/2009 13:35
democritus: gotcha. thanks :)
Bassic
Atheisto, I agree that that
Posted on: 02/02/2009 15:37
Atheisto, I agree that that their religion had diddly squat to do with their bringing about of those advancements. That was kind of my point. Just because I allow faith to inform my being it does not mean I am devoid of rational thought, analytical ability or scientific insight.
Where the Athiest Bus people have a good point is when religion spends its time burning scientists at the stake. I agree, and also want to point out that enlightened religious folks don't do that kind of stuff. In fact, enlightened religious folks are so ticked off at the burning folks that they make ads and websites like this one.
I think we can all agree on that. (Except possibly the folks I just called un-enlightened.)
Arminius
Hi Democritus: Thanks for
Posted on: 02/02/2009 15:53
Hi Democritus:
Thanks for familiarizing us with the ancient Democritus.
I am spiritual only inasmuch as I consider the natural divine. I have no supernatural beliefs, and don't believe in any deities other than that I regard the universe itself as spiritual and divine, the self-generative "Kosmos" of the Gnostics or ancient Greek philosophers. This is borderline spirituality. I sometimes call it "spiritual atheism."
Democritus
Arminius wrote: I am
Posted on: 02/03/2009 11:40
I am spiritual only inasmuch as I consider the natural divine. I have no supernatural beliefs, and don't believe in any deities other than that I regard the universe itself as spiritual and divine, the self-generative "Kosmos" of the Gnostics or ancient Greek philosophers. This is borderline spirituality. I sometimes call it "spiritual atheism."
Hmm...I find your choice of words somewhat confusing. 'Divine' typically refers to something that came from a god. But you then say that you don't believe in gods, so I think you are misusing the word divine. I think sticking with the use of the word spiritual or perhaps sacred or awe-inspiring or something along those lines might be more clear.
Atheisto
Democritus wrote: Arminius
Posted on: 02/03/2009 11:44
I am spiritual only inasmuch as I consider the natural divine. I have no supernatural beliefs, and don't believe in any deities other than that I regard the universe itself as spiritual and divine, the self-generative "Kosmos" of the Gnostics or ancient Greek philosophers. This is borderline spirituality. I sometimes call it "spiritual atheism."
Hmm...I find your choice of words somewhat confusing. 'Divine' typically refers to something that came from a god. But you then say that you don't believe in gods, so I think you are misusing the word divine. I think sticking with the use of the word spiritual or perhaps sacred or awe-inspiring or something along those lines might be more clear.
Don't fight it...Arminius is confusing. I've been here for ages and I still have no clue what he's on about.
wheels
I believe - atheists don't.
Posted on: 04/01/2009 20:17
I believe - atheists don't. Does it really matter? It's more important that we respect each other's opinions and keep the lines of communication open.
Arminius
Atheisto wrote: Democritus
Posted on: 04/02/2009 01:58
I am spiritual only inasmuch as I consider the natural divine. I have no supernatural beliefs, and don't believe in any deities other than that I regard the universe itself as spiritual and divine, the self-generative "Kosmos" of the Gnostics or ancient Greek philosophers. This is borderline spirituality. I sometimes call it "spiritual atheism."
Hmm...I find your choice of words somewhat confusing. 'Divine' typically refers to something that came from a god. But you then say that you don't believe in gods, so I think you are misusing the word divine. I think sticking with the use of the word spiritual or perhaps sacred or awe-inspiring or something along those lines might be more clear.
Don't fight it...Arminius is confusing. I've been here for ages and I still have no clue what he's on about.
Hi Democritus:
If the universe is self-generative and thus self-godly, then everything is divine, or godly—or not. Take your pick.
I choose to live in a divine universe.
spockis53
wheels wrote: I believe -
Posted on: 04/02/2009 14:52
I believe - atheists don't. Does it really matter? It's more important that we respect each other's opinions and keep the lines of communication open.
Does it matter? Yes it does matter. Acting on belief versus acting on objective, rational knowledge are two very different things.
How can an opinion based on personal belief be respected if the same standards don't apply?
And why should I respect any actions you might take based on a faith-based, personal opinion? There'd be no integrity to anything.
LL&P
Spock
Saul_now_Paul
Hi Spockis53, You
Posted on: 04/02/2009 16:11
IBelieve
Saul_now_Paul wrote: Hi
Posted on: 04/02/2009 16:21
Hi Spockis53,
Hi Old Buddy,
I've missed you. I'm glad we worship the same loving God. I'm not pretty sure you are right. I know in my "KNOWER" that you are right.
People require proof from me about my God. All I can say is that I have been given absolute proof and that is all I need!!
Be Blessed,
IB