Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

Unworthy of Grace?

I have been thinking a lot about this issue. This thread is a somewhat of a spin off from LB's thread about worthiness. I am leaning these days more toward a more universalist view of God for a few reasons. For one, I believe hell is a state of mind. It's a place of guilt and shame and low self worth. I also believe that all people have both good and sinful aspects in them...but the original intended purity of their soul does not get destroyed by the sinfullness of this world we are stuck in. The bad/ imperfect within them gets destroyed in the end, I believe--it disappears and is forgotten-- but the good is preserved...and I have to believe this includes everyone, because I don't believe God is less forgiving than humans are capable of. This just doesn't make sense, for a loving God to be less forgiving than I am capable of..and I don't believe an all knowing God who made us could hold our small minds against us. Thoughts?

Share this

Comments

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

It is essential to still love

It is essential to still love God and love our neighbours as ourselves in this life. There are some church doctrines which seem to believe and /or teach that one must accept Grace, even though they are taught they are not worthy in God's eyes, or risk going to a physical eternal hell. Some of the debate around this has been, "well, if there's no eternal hell...why be Christian." which then translates into "without fear of hell, how will we then keep our members coming to church?" Something about that just doesn't seem right to me. Where is the grace in allowing a child to be born who risks growing up and  falling into eternal damnation? If that's the case it's cruel to have children. I don't believe in that. I can't. It would be cruel of me to believe in that, and like I said, unless I have more capacity for love and forgivess than God (which I don't believe either) I can't believe in eternal hell..

http://www.confessingumc.org/happenings-around-the-church/on-hell/

 

I took out the paragraph originally here. Sorry, this post really wasn't meant to point a finger at the UMC or any particular denomination-- I just read it  again and it read that way. I know many (most?) denominations believe in literal hell, and I just disagree with there being no point in being a Christian otherwise (and I wonder how much of the concept  was created by the early church after the romans got ahold of it-- because I believe once someone with power fiirmly establishes the concept of hell, turns hell into a doctrine, and promotes a terrifying fear of hell, and that fear creates a type of hell in the minds of those who fear it, right here on earth--I suppose I don't see the grace in that-- and I was  surprised this essay came from UCM because I guess I assumed they were quite liberal and had no postion on it one way or the other (kind of like the UCC).

 

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

God's Grace rains on the

God's Grace rains on the unjust and just alike. We all are worthy of Grace.

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

Hi Arminius: "Hope springs

Hi Arminius: "Hope springs eternal..." --Alexander Pope (the other Pope ;) )

seeler's picture

seeler

image

Thinking back to my

Thinking back to my childhood, I don't believe that the concept of 'hell' was ever big on my horizon, but that didn't stop me from being interested in my developing Christianity.  When I reached young adulthood and formulated the thought that hell probably didn't exist except perhaps as 'hell on earth', I remained a Christian.

 

Heaven isn't big on my horizon either.   I believe what happens in the here and now is what matters - the concept of heaven on earth.   I think that may continue after death - that death isn't the end - but if it could be proven to me that there isn't any afterlife, I don't think that would stop me from being a Christian here today.  It is who I am.  

 

 

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

seeler wrote: Thinking back

seeler wrote:

Thinking back to my childhood, I don't believe that the concept of 'hell' was ever big on my horizon, but that didn't stop me from being interested in my developing Christianity.  When I reached young adulthood and formulated the thought that hell probably didn't exist except perhaps as 'hell on earth', I remained a Christian.

 

Heaven isn't big on my horizon either.   I believe what happens in the here and now is what matters - the concept of heaven on earth.   I think that may continue after death - that death isn't the end - but if it could be proven to me that there isn't any afterlife, I don't think that would stop me from being a Christian here today.  It is who I am.  

 

 

 

Thank you, seeler. Sometimes I have these existentialist dilemas.

Mendalla's picture

Mendalla

image

Arminius wrote: God's Grace

Arminius wrote:

God's Grace rains on the unjust and just alike. We all are worthy of Grace.

 

There is, of course, the alternative point of view that none of us are worthy of Divine Grace, tainted as we are by sin, but that God, being loving and compassionate, gives it anyway in order to raise us up. IOW, we aren't worthy save that God's love makes us so. Or something like that.

 

I don't totally buy that one myself, but I do find that it, in some way, is a more humbling notion of Grace and has the added power of God taking the harder road by loving us in spite of our nature rather than because of it.

 

Likely, I'd take a more middle position and say that while we may not always be (or, at least, we not always see ourselves as being) worthy of God's Grace, it's there anyway because Supreme Love never fails even though ours might. Keeps the humility without the notion of "total depravity"  because, frankly, I don't buy the notion that we are THAT mired in our human weaknesses.

 

Now, this all begs the question of what Grace is for in the first place. I'm not really into afterlife theology (I'm agnostic on the existence of such at best, and largely disregard it as being not very relevant to my "real life"). For me, death is a physical transformation, a re-merging of our human form with the greater world of which we are a part. For me, then, it's about having God's love to uplift us and strengthen as people in this life, to enable us to make our lives better instead of sliding into our individual private Hells.

 

Mendalla

 

rishi's picture

rishi

image

In Alcoholics Anonymous, they

In Alcoholics Anonymous, they sometimes use the expression “hitting bottom” to describe a state where some crisis allows you to perceive more accurately what is happening in your life. Defenses and illusions about yourself and life seem to become unsustainable.

 

In AA culture, this "hitting bottom" is usually seen to always be a good thing, since it often leads to a person seeking help to find a way out of self-destructive behavior. Personally, I don't think it's always a good thing. It's only good, in my view, when it happens in a human context where there is genuine faith, hope, and love available to help the person at “the bottom” understand herself and life in a way that fosters healing and growth. (I emphasize understand, because faith, hope, and love are not simply emotions; they are knowledgeable visions of life.) Apart from that healing context, “the bottom” can just become an abyss for the person where her life gets worse instead of better.

 

So what is “the bottom” in itself?  What you called  "existentialist dilemmas" are key here. Because if we really seek to know our human existence as it is (apart from our fantasies about how we wish it were), we discover a big existential dilemma -- that we are extremely dependent, even absolutely dependent, creatures. We depend on a number of conditions being “just so” simply in order to survive. And going beyond survival, to flourishing as a human being, requires even more conditions to be “just so.”

 

And so, “the bottom” in itself  is that place in which I become conscious of the reality that my existence is absolutely dependent upon multiple conditions, some of which are completely beyond my control.

 

And thus, when I am at the bottom, I can (metaphorically and sometimes literally) hear Death knocking loudly at the door, and I realize to some extent that at any moment I could be gone from this life.  And that creates fear, because something in me (I would say it is the Imago Dei within us -- that divine pattern in which the human soul is formed) longs not just to survive but to flourish and to never stop flourishing).

 

And so, at “the bottom,” the conditions for my survival (bodily health, a sane lifestyle, food, water, shelter, medicine, and so on) become clear. And yet, if the conditions for my flourishing as a person (faith, hope, and love) are not really present for me in human form at that juncture, I may not care whether I survive or not, much less whether I'm fulfilling my potential as a human being.

 

In truth, we are all absolutely dependent creatures. But we are not always conscious of that reality; we are not always at “the bottom.” Because, in fantasy, we can suspend ourselves very high up off the ground, imagining ourselves and our lives to be all sorts of things – the worst son on earth; the perfect daughter; the best lover; the one who doesn't deserve to be protected from harm; the one who will have the shiniest halo in heaven; etc., etc.. So, "being unworthy of grace" in this view would be one of many possible illusions that doesn't really exist on the "bottom."  On the bottom there is only the reality of our absolute dependence and the grace of God.

 

Ironically, the self-destructive things that we do in life are often aimed at perpetuating these kinds of fantasies that keep us off “the bottom,” where the truth of our existence would become clear.

 

On the other hand, sometimes there seems to be a real wisdom in staying a bit “off the ground,” when the surrounding human conditions really lack faith, hope, and love.

 

So, is “the bottom” good or evil? It can be either, depending on the real presence of faith, hope, and love.

 

These three are the core virtues that Aquinas understood as being wholly transcendental (meaning that although faith, hope, and love are infused into,  mediated through, and cultivated in our mortal human lives and relationships, they are divine in nature; they can't be manufactured by us.) They shine an eternal light onto “the bottom” which allows us to recognize that absolute dependence is not only the truth of who we are, but the ultimate best place to live, to flourish as a human being. All of the core practices of Christianity revolve around locating, transmitting, and cultivating faith, hope, and love.

 

Any philosophy or religion that is worth its salt really needs to have grappled with “the bottom.” As I understand it, one of the ways the Christian tradition has done that historically is through the concepts of Heaven and Hell. Heaven is “the bottom” in the presence of faith, hope, and love. And Hell is “the bottom” in their absence. So, in one sense, Heaven and Hell are not two different places at all, but two different ways of relating to the very same reality of human existence. The key is the presence of that which grace alone can provide.  (Although it may sound like it, this is not the same as the more modern view that Heaven & Hell are just states of mind that we construct. Because it involves grace, the mind of God being the source of faith, hope, and love, it goes beyond the horizon of modern thought.)

 

As Jesus said, in the midst of one of the most Hellish environments imaginable, "the kingdom of Heaven is at hand."

 

 

 

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

Thanks Rishi. That's a very

Thanks Rishi. That's a very profound response that will probably take me some more time to digest. I think you understand what I'm getting at. I understand the heaven/ hell concept from experience here in this life. I agree that we are totally dependent. We are also interdependent...so, suppose, by the Grace of God, if I am able to give up my ego essentialy, and receive the Grace of God with faith hope and love...despite feeling unworthy. What about others who are not able to...whose concepts of themselves are already so beaten down that they fight grace and accept an artificial self concept, because they don't know how to do otherwise? Do you believe they will be lost? Or might they prevail like Jacob wrestling with God on the road? And what if they lose the struggle, will they still be lost?  Because I have a really hard time with the concept that anyone should be lost...it's not about me, it's about us.

rishi's picture

rishi

image

Kimmio wrote: What about

Kimmio wrote:

What about others who are not able to...whose concepts of themselves are already so beaten down that they fight grace and accept an artificial self concept, because they don't know how to do otherwise? Do you believe they will be lost? Or might they prevail like Jacob wrestling with God on the road? And what if they lose the struggle, will they still be lost?  Because I have a really hard time with the concept that anyone should be lost...it's not about me, it's about us.

 

I think a lot depends on the human community which surroundis those persons, how able it becomes to 'channel' the faith, hope, and love that they need to flourish.

 

One traditional Christian view of the afterlife for persons in such dire straights is that they find themselves in a realm (purgatory) where angelic beings, who are able to transmit divine faith, hope, and love more reliably, assist them in facing "the bottom," which was unbearable in their life on earth.  The idea here is that "the bottom" is a kind of purifying crucible, which we can only withstand the heat of through the continuous supports of faith, hope, and love. So if, due to evil conditions, earthly life does not provide a person with such supports to establishing the reign of God in their hearts, purgatory does.  In some ways, this resembles traditional Buddhist views of 'purification of karma,' which are also universalist (in the end.)

 

 

 

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

Kimmio wrote: Hi Arminius:

Kimmio wrote:

Hi Arminius: "Hope springs eternal..." --Alexander Pope (the other Pope ;) )

 

The better Pope, eh?wink

 

(But I think Mr. Ratzinger would agree with Mr. Pope. :-)

 

Mendalla's picture

Mendalla

image

Rishi,   Must digest your

Rishi,

 

Must digest your ideas more, but I think there's a lot of truth in there. The notion that Heaven and Hell are really just a difference in the presence of faith, hope, and love when we hit the bottom rings powerfully.

 

Mendalla

 

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

I don't think anyone is ever

I don't think anyone is ever totally lost. We all are safely in God's hands, at all times, only some of us are temporarily lost.

 

I think God's Grace is omnipresent and everpresent, only some of us are not aware of this, and therefore do not act accordingly. Opening ourselves to the Grace of God is becoming aware of what there already is, and of what we already are: the image of God. Once we have become aware, all there is left to do is think and act in the spirit of God.

 

In secular language, the creative power or force of the universe is omnipresent and everpresent. But it is up to us to become aware of IT, be at-one with IT, and think and act on ITs behalf.

 

 

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

I manage and operate a

I manage and operate a cemetery as a retirement project ...

 

Talk about people hitting bottom ... but then they don't have to think about life anymore do they! Perhaps they do but canot any longer feel life as something beyond that horizon of cognizance.

 

One Funeral Director told me he wishes to be frozen in liquid nitrogen, have his head sharpeded to a razor point and driven into the earth ... perhaps because he doesn't like the concept of not feeling things from a cool perspective ... or maybe because he'd like to heat up some of the cold thoughtless religious perspectives. It does raise questions in my mind. The earth is a hard mire to take as we've fallen here by a Dantean mode ... expected to rise up and fight for out connections ... to everything. But alas we are a greedy population by education.

 

I think of hell as just life for 95% of humanity ... about 5% or less seem to think they deserve it all ... why the old script says we don't need tyrants and monarchs. Some hidden altruism there? As a child of a single parent I never got frenzied over what "religious" people did but they sure made me question the sense of Christianity these people were given as they fought with everybody and everything within their horizon as if it were their private territory to be controlled ... no sharing even considered. Wouldn't it be hell for those upright citizens to know they were hurting the rest of creation by just being alive? But denial is a great thing ... then one doesn't have to be aware of anything ... that's theri definition of heaven ... like the blast of sex as a sign ... mind blowing experience ... me, I' strange or alien I'D like to know how to do it better so we could learn faster how not to self-destruct ... Maxwellian humours? Is that smart or a different kind of heaven ... that's hell for the disallusioned about their wealth ... thinking it was theirs to take with eM as they were pounded into the Mire ... the last frontier of the imaginary ... soul? Da sum mind eh b'y ... wah oude Scie ... right on dah edge ...

MC jae's picture

MC jae

image

Well, I was worthy of Grace,

Well, I was worthy of Grace, but I married Casey.

Mendalla's picture

Mendalla

image

MorningCalm wrote: Well, I

MorningCalm wrote:

Well, I was worthy of Grace, but I married Casey.

 

LOL. Who says Baptists don't have a sense of humour?

 

Mendalla

 

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

WaterBuoy wrote: I manage

WaterBuoy wrote:

I manage and operate a cemetery as a retirement project ...

 

Hi WB: I envy you; this is my dream occupation!

 

But I would prefer eco-burial (in a jute sack in a hole in the ground) with trees, shrubs and flowers planted on top, and with the cemetery doubling as a public park. People would walk and enjoy the consecrated park while contemplating nature, life and death, God, and all those that are buried.

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

Hi Kimmio-- I did not write

Hi Kimmio-- I did not write this ,other men have . But it is very close to what I believe.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Philippians 2:12-15

(12) Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; (13) for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure. (14) Do all things without complaining and disputing, (15) that you may become blameless and harmless, children of God without fault in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world,
New King James Version   Change Bible versions

These four verses admonish us on what God expects of us as the child in our relationship with Him. It is important for us to understand that "work out your salvation" does not mean work for salvation. It means we must take what God has given us to its logical conclusion. God liberated Israel from Egyptian slavery, but His purpose was not complete until they trekked across the wilderness and possessed the Promised Land. Their liberty came as an act of God's grace, but that same grace required them to meet responsibilities and carry them to their conclusion.

Verse 13 explains that God's grace did not end at the borders of Egypt for them, nor does it end for us once we are justified. He gives us both the motivation and the power to accomplish what His pleasure is for us. But we should understand that He gives us the desire and power to accomplish His will, not our pleasures. This is an excellent principle for parents to apply in motivating their children to respond positively. Children are largely the creations of their parents. If parents expect their children to reach certain goals, they must equip them with the attitudes, skills, and tools necessary to accomplish those aims.

"Fear and trembling" indicates both a deep respect for the Almighty who has called us, as well as a healthy measure of concern for uncertainties about what will be required of us as we proceed along this way. As we spiritually mature, the trials we must work through generally become more difficult, not easier. When the Philippians took up their cross, they did not know for sure what lay ahead, nor do we. For them, it was conflict (Philippians 1:29-30); for Jesus, death (Philippians 2:8); for Paul, martyrdom (Philippians 2:17); for Timothy, costly sacrificial service to the church (Philippians 2:20); and for Epaphroditus, physical illness nearly to death (Philippians 2:27).

Of course, these things are far more serious than a child's responsibility to put his room in order, but we must consider if God is fair in His dealings with man. Is a parent fair in charging his children with responsibilities to carry out around the house?


Hell to me , is not a place where you are put to die. all though it is called the secound death. Nor do I believe any one, is judge  there yet. God Bless airclean33

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

Arm, My plan is to have a

Arm,

My plan is to have a granite urn set into the ground (one of those flower attachments to a headstone) and my ashes buried beneath it ... that would fertilize anything stuck into the upper end of what's left ... a flowering genus ... or J' Nous ... Lilethe all over again ... a resurrection of the aforesaid in renewed form?

 

Everything changes ... look at the swirl of the cos mos ... an esh in symbol ... or is that Asian as the yellow horde that frightened the crap out of the medi-terranean tyrants of the pas-T ...

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

A few posts back, Mendalla

A few posts back, Mendalla said that we need to define "Grace" before discussing it.

 

To me, Grace is the awareness of universal unity or at-one-ment. This unity is already there, but most of us are not aware of it. Becoming aware of and experiencing our innate unity with everyone and everything, and thinking and acting from the depth of this awareness, is Grace.

 

As Rishi stated, often we need to hit rock-bottom, or undergo a severe personal crisis, a so-called dark night of the soul, before becoming aware of universal unity and divinity. 

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi Arminius,   Arminius

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

God's Grace rains on the unjust and just alike. We all are worthy of Grace.

 

Amen.

 

If we were worthy it couldn't be grace.  It would be reward.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

Grace is a given ... that's

Grace is a given ... that's A'Don's in old tongues sort of like a' pole us ... something to look upon as not the way to do IT ... so we don't ... beautiful souls are  non-existant they tell us ... imaginary like Newton's and other relative Jinn IO-us as portions of alchemy .. and you know what institutions believe of alchemy ... leads to change ...

 

That is to think ... a latent force in the emotional being ... but always some irregularities ... some of us do ... as nothing is perfect!

 

It's a given like PS alms ... is that sub Urnal ... like Matthew 6:8 ... the unknown father of all knowing what you need before you ask? That's a strickly out-of-here comment ... Eire! Post scripted ... like on a stele ... there has to be a bottom tuit or ID'll fall over ... Cos unknown to the St OI-c ...

rishi's picture

rishi

image

Mendalla

Mendalla wrote:

Rishi,

The notion that Heaven and Hell are really just a difference in the presence of faith, hope, and love when we hit the bottom rings powerfully.

 

Today's e-message from L'Arche sounds in the same key:

Jean Vanier wrote:

"The Despicable"

 

Martin Luther King said that people cannot stop despising others - as well as other groups of people - unless they accept what is despicable in themselves. What is it we all despise in ourselves? Isn't it our radical poverty, our utter helplessness in many situations, our need of others, our mortality, and our capacity to hurt others?

The Paradox of Disability, p.23

 

Also today's (Feb 11):

Jean Vanier wrote:

"Upside down"

 

The broken and the oppressed have taught me a great deal and have change me quite radically. They have helped me discover that healing takes place at the bottom of the ladder, not at the top.

From Brokenness to Community, p.23


Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

revjohn wrote: Hi

revjohn wrote:

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

God's Grace rains on the unjust and just alike. We all are worthy of Grace.

 

Amen.

 

If we were worthy it couldn't be grace.  It would be reward.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

 

Yes, revjohn, I agree: God's Grace is not a reward. But most of those who were graced try to become worthy of the Grace that was so miraculously bestowed on them. And some fall from Grace, and are graced again. Makes on speechless in awe and wonder.

 

 

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi Arminius,   Arminius

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

But most of those who were graced try to become worthy of the Grace that was so miraculously bestowed on them.

 

Supposing for the moment that I accept your assertion of "most of those graced try to become worthy" my question is, "what is the point?"  Followed quickly by "Is this an appropriate response?"

 

Do these most try to become worhty so as to up the value of the grace?  Does that mean that they think God in being gracious plays the part of the fool and their attempts to prove themselves worthy (after the fact of God's grace) is meant to save God some embarrasment?  Or, is it a prideful attempt to indicate that they really do not need such grace since they are worthy of a reward instead?

 

I understand a facet of gratitude would be attempting to do better (repentence comes to mind) or at least turn away from what it is that is so bad to begin with.  The drive to become worthy strikes me as grace killing.

 

Arminius wrote:

And some fall from Grace, and are graced again.

 

I reject the notion of fallen from grace on the grounds that it places greater emphasis on the individual who falls than it does God's ability to show grace.  It also, of necessity, limits God's ability to be gracious.  What new grace could possibly exist if any individual could throw themselves out of God's grace to begin with?  Does God have an even greater grace or does this new grace come from one who is far greater than God?

 

Arminius wrote:

Makes on speechless in awe and wonder.

 

Grace does indeed have the power to do that.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

Hi John:   My point was

Hi John:

 

My point was that most people whom we regard as saintly became so after they were graced. In other words, they were not graced because they were saintly, they became saintly because they were graced.

 

Some of them fell from Grace—in their own or other people's opinion—but lived up to it again and imagined themselves to be graced again.

 

My definition of "Grace" may, of course, differ from yours or other people's. I feel and think that we are united as one within the body of God. And experiencing this unity is Grace.

 

sheldon's picture

sheldon

image

Hi Kimmio... I am new here...

Hi Kimmio... I am new here... Please allow me to introduce myself...my name is Sheldon. I hope I can offer something of value in way of response to your thoughts and while I am by no means an authority on any topic, and my responses are invariably my personal opinion, I am always willing to put forward my view on a thing. If I may...

 

...I see grace as something given to me by my Creator without the need for me to cultivate a desire for it. I can only assume that grace is not with-held... I do not know for certain and yet, for such a lowly creature as I to show kindness to another human being... can my Creator be worth less?

 

I too see heaven and hell as states of being rather than physical realities.  Long ago and in another life, I read a description of heaven and hell that has stuck with me through the long years... that heaven is nearness to God and hell is remoteness from him.

 

Also, I believe that we are born unstained... I believe it is the calling of every new heart to fair-spoken, well-thought and filled with love and wonder. Only afterwards do we go this way or that way... one road leading to light and honour while the other road leads ever to mischief and strife.

 

I found your thoughts intriguing and hope that I have not been too bold in responding. 

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

Hi Sheldon. Welcome to Wonder

Hi Sheldon. Welcome to Wonder Cafe!

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. I appreciate your willingness to jump right into the discussion. I hope you join in more!

I think many here would agree with your description that heaven is nearness to God, and hell is remoteness.  Just how that is believed or experienced tends to differ. I think there's a lot of truth to Rishi's idea that heaven and hell are two different experiences of hitting bottom for some...depending on the faith hope and love present in the person's life.

sheldon's picture

sheldon

image

Thank you for the warm

Thank you for the warm welcome Kimmio and thank you for pointing me to Rishi's post. I have a tendency to read the original post in a thread and repsond without reading beyond that since it is the original post that catches my attention. 

seeler's picture

seeler

image

Welcome Sheldon!   I hope

Welcome Sheldon!   I hope that you enjoy your time on the Cafe and share your thoughts and ideas with us.

 

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

If grace is a given should it

If grace is a given should it be shared without limits to support the balance of creation? Now there's a far out idea ... stretch of the emotional state!

 

Mankind, in a Roman, or Macedonian sense is not predisposed to giving (a'Don's, or adonat) but to taking ... thus causeing collapse of the garden. Heavenly fallout ... Cosmological Tumble---Dantean irony? There is a spark of evidence that the Sahara and the Middle East were once a garden and a great effort was made to cut timbers to move stones for the construct of temples and palaces ... perhaps dark places for mankind to regress form social activity... in ignorance and unbalanced emotions?

 

Looking at this from exterior or explicit dimensions, something falls into place, but how mortals hate alien thoughts as we cling to the institution and rant on about technology that'll change things. Hey folk, eyore not allowed to go there by conservative law of polity ... being beyond is that hated fringe ... like mire lin' in the myth ... he and his crew conjured other things ...

 

That's beyond savannah ... either rediculous or sublime ... that should be looked into ... mankind's limited soul is one good example of the mortal state of affairs in which we stand opposed to active thinking ... with Carries ... a deep hole to put thoughts in ...

 

I did say that neurologically the mind is as tory and the corolary is balanced ... it soude th ere ... phonetic-Allah speaking as a differential of Hebrew and Aramaic! Hoo'n a fixed whorl wod know the difference ...

 

Hi, Shell-Don, welcome to delightful non-sense .. the sixth factor of the sole entiity leading to the 7th that's de wash or Bath's'eBa ... Dan's of delight of the lower wadis ... dry gulch in Meso Pot aime 'a' ... must be whetted with higher wadis ... shamayim of Gnoen ... or Gnomes that don't wish the subject bridged ... all the wee people would know all the errors of past conservation that wasn't!

 

In short the whole thing is a comedy to tickle the fantasy of higher powers stuck with us ... dae monis, or just dimons? Just observe and think about what humans do to one another and expect no eccos to come back at eM! That's an ancient expression on Ego, or reflection in sin that will come back at yah in de future ... why the Gods receeded ... regressed and not a sole of one've eM can be found today as St. Nickolas of Cusa stated Gods heart is everywhere and his thoughts nowhere to be found by the ignorate or illiterate that can't read into the whole thing ... a gross Torah as myth ... about oppression of thought in a state of delight! Can such a tier in the frothy state speak at yah? If it does the authority will tell you your insane to discourage you from goan th' Eire ... realm of the Celtic Myth! It Ayres ... like Sam's Une ... that wee beaut within ...

Oris that bode, easily converted to v'de ich terms if you see the alien tensor inuit ... of high brewing factors ... upended ...

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

sheldon wrote: Thank you

sheldon wrote:

Thank you for the warm welcome Kimmio and thank you for pointing me to Rishi's post. I have a tendency to read the original post in a thread and repsond without reading beyond that since it is the original post that catches my attention. 

 

Hi sheldon; welcome to wondercafe!

 

Reading the original post and responding to it is fine, especially if a thread is already several feet long when one first gets to it and one can't possibly respond to all replies.

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

Now, more on

Now, more on Grace.

 

When discussing the concept of godly grace, or any other religious or spiritual concept, it probably is best to state, as precisely as one can, how one defines the concept under discussion. Otherwise we are are talking by each others heads rather than into them.

 

Standard dictionary definitions can sometimes be applied, but even those often vary widely, and individual definitions can vary even more, so it seems best to define exactly what we mean when talking about a particular concept.

 

I feel and think that ultimate reality is an inseparable, self-creative whole in a state of synthesis. I call this reality "God," but those who are averse to that term can call it anything they like. Anyway, experiencing the ultimate reality, to me, is Grace.

 

Although they don't call it God, even some scientists agree that reality ultimately is in a state of synthesis. This state is not only one of utter unity, it is beyond analytical comprehension. But it is the real state of being, and we can experience it in the pure, non-analyzed or unconceptualized experience. This experience, to me, is Grace.

 

The Sufi mystic al-Balyani said, 700 or so years ago:

 

 The truth which is God is hidden by a veil. Reason cannot remove the veil because reason is the veil.

 

I agree. But when talking about anything, we must necessarily use logical concepts. But, to me, these concepts are no more than the best and most logical explanations I have available at the time. Tomorrow I may have different and better ones.

 

Panentheism's picture

Panentheism

image

Mendalla wrote: Arminius

Mendalla wrote:

Arminius wrote:

God's Grace rains on the unjust and just alike. We all are worthy of Grace.

 

There is, of course, the alternative point of view that none of us are worthy of Divine Grace, tainted as we are by sin, but that God, being loving and compassionate, gives it anyway in order to raise us up. IOW, we aren't worthy save that God's love makes us so. Or something like that.

 

I don't totally buy that one myself, but I do find that it, in some way, is a more humbling notion of Grace and has the added power of God taking the harder road by loving us in spite of our nature rather than because of it.

 

Likely, I'd take a more middle position and say that while we may not always be (or, at least, we not always see ourselves as being) worthy of God's Grace, it's there anyway because Supreme Love never fails even though ours might. Keeps the humility without the notion of "total depravity"  because, frankly, I don't buy the notion that we are THAT mired in our human weaknesses.

 

Now, this all begs the question of what Grace is for in the first place. I'm not really into afterlife theology (I'm agnostic on the existence of such at best, and largely disregard it as being not very relevant to my "real life"). For me, death is a physical transformation, a re-merging of our human form with the greater world of which we are a part. For me, then, it's about having God's love to uplift us and strengthen as people in this life, to enable us to make our lives better instead of sliding into our individual private Hells.

 

Mendalla

 

 

Nice and so have been the other posts.  To restate, afterlife is a possiblity metaphysically and empirically, but so what.  It is the now that is our concern the after life is up to God. But what we do here and now makes a difference to Supreme Love now and as a resource.  But Supreme Love can take the negative and in the old gospel hymn wash it clean.  That is not our worry how it is done or if is done in each nano second.  Grace is God's business, which when we learn it, we offer to othersn - it becomes out character.

sheldon's picture

sheldon

image

  Hello Rishi...I like how

 

Hello Rishi...I like how you write. If it's okay with you I would like to share something. You're thoughts on absolute dependence struck a chord with me and so...  My road in a nutshell.
 
Psychological and emotional neglect and abuse,
which led to isolation and lonliness,
from which came want and desire,
which birthed greed and addiction.
 
I hit bottom through a heady and long-term combination of drugs and alcohol.
 
Initially, it was pure instinct that kept me going. I was conscious of nothing beyond my physical needs. Not pleasure or comfort, rather, the basic need for food and shelter were the over-riding priorities. It was, perhaps, a personal biological imperative that kept me alive?... maybe not? It was long ago, yet, I do not remember fear... I remember despair... I remember wishing to be quit of this place. Hope did return, but it came later.
 
I clearly remember thinking, 'Is this it? Is this all there is? Why am I here then?'. I clearly remember my next thought... 'Why you are here is unimportant and you ask only out of vanity. Now that you're listening, the correct question is, where do I go from here?'
 
You must understand that a connection to my Creator was not a part of my life nor were thoughts of the spirit. I existed... nothing more. To say that the latter question, formed in my mind in just that shape, had an effect on me would be a serious understatement. 
 
Later, after much work, and as I began the long journey of re-joining humanity, I started to re-connect with life. This is when I began to understand the dependency you mentioned. To me, it means that we are nothing without others. I need them and, just as important, they need me. We are all connected. The molecules that describe us, the world, the stars and the universe are the same. The loss of any part diminishes the whole and yet, when a life is lived to its potential, that loss is lessened by such a contribution. 
 
Perhaps, that is grace... perhaps, accepting life in all its wonderful diversity is the grace by which our continued existence is ensured... perhaps, the question that formed in my mind, the one I spoke of earlier, was the grace of my Creator washing over me... perhaps.
Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

Thanks for sharing your

Thanks for sharing your experiences with us Sheldon- very honest and beautifully written!

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

I was wondering why there

I was wondering why there seem to be a different understanding on Grace . God already showed us this ,in His word.--------------------------------------------------------------------------

   

Jhn 3:15 that whoever believes in him may have eternal life."
 

airclean---God Loved The world well it was still in Sin. The offer is to all.

  Jhn 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

Jhn 3:17 For God sent the Son into the world, not to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him.

Jhn 3:18 He who believes in him is not condemned; he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God

 

sheldon's picture

sheldon

image

Thank you Kimmio.   Thank

Thank you Kimmio.

 

Thank you Seeler and Arminius for welcoming me into your fold.

 

Hi airclean33... perhaps, the different understandings is exactly what is expected, and desired... after all, the Creator obviously loves wonderous diversity. We are a garden... isn't it more desirable to have a variety of beautiful, fragrant blooms?

 

With that, I am off to do shopping. I am very glad I found this place and I am sure you all have much you can teach me.

airclean33's picture

airclean33

image

Hi sheldon -- I am sorry , I

Hi sheldon -- I am sorry , I left my maners at Home. You are weicome here friend . You may be surprised what some here teach. Any time you wish to come in, to help me, or others learn please do so. Wondercafe is here to teach or learn.If your lucky you may get a smile now and then. God Bless ---airclean33

rishi's picture

rishi

image

sheldon wrote: Hello

sheldon wrote:

Hello Rishi...I like how you write. If it's okay with you I would like to share something. You're thoughts on absolute dependence struck a chord with me and so...  My road in a nutshell.
 

 

From what you've said, we have a lot in common, Sheldon,  All that you've said hits home. There is something that I like to remind myself of frequently. It's four sentences that I often repeat to help me stay centered. It goes like this:

 

I am nothing

I have nothing

I deserve nothing

But I am given everything.

 

I tend not to share that widely, especially the line that says "I deserve nothing," because it can give people the idea that I must be drowing in low self-esteem, self-hatred, etc. etc.  But I'm not, not by any means.  For me those words evoke nothing but grace and liberation.  But I think their beauty may be hard to hear, unless the person hearing them is also at the "bottom" and happy to be there.

 

It's a joy to meet you, Sheldon.  Welcome!

 

sheldon's picture

sheldon

image

Hi airclean33...thank you

Hi airclean33...thank you :)

 

Hi Rishi...I sensed a commonality between us when I read your reponse to Kimmio's questions. I thought, 'here is an individual that may have gone down a similar path'. Different circumstances perhaps, yet, alike discoveries.

 

I like those four sentences very much. There is a lot of truth in those few words.. sometimes, humility can be mistaken for lowliness just as confidence can be mistaken for arrogance. I think it is the difference between knowledge and experience... they tend to be quite different. 

 

We live in a world that is obssesed with money and material gain and I can easily see how the third sentence would contradict what some folks believe about their selves.

 

My experience informs me that while I am not unimportant, life will continue without me and, since I have already been gifted with life and a spirit and a mind, what exactly is it that I think I deserve.

 

Thanks for sharing those words with me Rishi.

 

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

Well, Rishi and Sheldon, if

Well, Rishi and Sheldon, if you were given everything, then you are everything, aren't you?

 

Once one is given everything, then one becomes everything and nothing, has everything and nothing, and is everything and nothing.

 

Being everything seems like utter conceit, being nothing like excessive humility. But being everything and nothing is the highest possible conceit, the deepest possible humility, and the balance between the two. And, possibly, divine grace and enlightenment as well.

sheldon's picture

sheldon

image

Arminius wrote: Well, Rishi

Arminius wrote:

Well, Rishi and Sheldon, if you were given everything, then you are everything, aren't you?

 

 

My sense of this is different than yours Arminius, unless I have completely misinterpreted your words.
 
As I understand it, everything I am given is only and exactly what I need... to be who I am and perhaps who I will become. Beyond that, I cannot say.
Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

sheldon wrote: Arminius

sheldon wrote:

Arminius wrote:

Well, Rishi and Sheldon, if you were given everything, then you are everything, aren't you?

 

 

My sense of this is different than yours Arminius, unless I have completely misinterpreted your words.
 
As I understand it, everything I am given is only and exactly what I need... to be who I am and perhaps who I will become. Beyond that, I cannot say.

 

Yes, sheldon, I get what you mean.

 

Becoming everything, to me, is losing the sense of being an egoic self and becoming, well, everything.

 

After this, the individual self is still there, but no longer egocentric. It has shifted from egocentric to cosmocentric. Or, for those who regard the self-creative cosmos as God, the indvidual self is no longer in service of just itself but in the service of the all-inclusive totality which is God.

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

The Romans and the Jews had

The Romans and the Jews had trouble with the concept of nothing and everything (in-finite form?) thus you obseve this in their vocabulary ... that remains mortally limited constrary yo the myth that says we should revere all tongues ... as a door to what?

 

It has beem stated many times that love is nothing and intellect is all that is out there unless you don't like the composite that would be an integral God ...

 

That's all I have to say write now ... in coded fax ...

 

Fore you cannot tell a mortal an altruism ... they didn't wish to know and thus creation made a medium for the soul of all0that0is to pass through as a peon or paean ... so he'd learn hedonistically about what isn't ... which is so much of what mortal doesn't know in satirical tongues for that is the only way to present IT which is intellect ... all that which's outs Eire ...

 

God's Darl Side shimmers ... quantum-like ... frothy as St Nick 've Cusus ... cussed by the old popes as so much bull ... and thus the bacca Lauriate form ... the numbing og man by love ... omi Gaw'd assis Tues ...

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi Arminius,   Arminius

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

My point was that most people whom we regard as saintly became so after they were graced. In other words, they were not graced because they were saintly, they became saintly because they were graced.

 

Fair point.  The grace of God proceeds saintliness.  That is different than becoming worthy of grace though.

 

Arminius wrote:

Some of them fell from Grace—in their own or other people's opinion—but lived up to it again and imagined themselves to be graced again.

 

This appears to reduce grace to mere opinion.  That is has no real heft outside of the context of what I think.  If that is the case it isn't actually grace that we are dealing with so much as self-seteem.

 

Arminius wrote:

My definition of "Grace" may, of course, differ from yours or other people's.

 

If that is so it makes conversation exceedingly difficult.  Dictionaries exist only as evidence of wasted time attempting to define that which others define for themselves.

 

Arminius wrote:

I feel and think that we are united as one within the body of God. And experiencing this unity is Grace.

 

So then, using your own definition.  We are one within the body of God and that is something you have yet defined.  Experiencing this oneness is grace?  How is this grace given?  And those who do not have this experience what are they missing?

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hello sheldon and welcome to

Hello sheldon and welcome to the WonderCafe.ca

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

revjohn wrote: Hi

revjohn wrote:

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

I feel and think that we are united as one within the body of God. And experiencing this unity is Grace.

 

So then, using your own definition.  We are one within the body of God and that is something you have yet defined.  Experiencing this oneness is grace?  How is this grace given?  And those who do not have this experience what are they missing?

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

 

Hi John:

 

The unitive grace I believe in is not given. It is already there, but most of us are not aware of it. Becoming aware of it by experiencing it is grace.

 

Those who do not experience grace miss out on the experience of universal unity. They also miss out on the feelings that come with this experience, like unitive love, consciousness, and conscience. They further miss out on the impulse to enact those.

 

Enacting those is, of course, contained in the Commandments. But after we are graced, we abide by them voluntarily or intuitively, following an inner impulse.

 

I also think that this state of grace is Jesus' "kingdom of heaven." Jesus eloquently expressed his grace with the statement "I and the Father are one."

 

Why some people experience grace and others not is a mystery to me. It think we can come close to experiencing it in meditation. But not everyone who meditates experiences grace, and some who don't meditate do. I sometimes thought that belief in a separate God precludes an experience of unity with God, but some people who believed in a separate supernatural God did experience grace. Even some atheists experienced grace.

 

I sometimes entertain the notion that grace is sort of a postive psychosis, a rapturous high that releases a flood of endorphins which keep us in a postively charged emotional state. But then, from my experience as well as the anecdotal reports of others, grace persist even in a negative emotional state, even into death, and thus must be more than a mere emotionally positive psychosis.

 

Well, I'm speculating. But my experience of grace has given me the absolute certainty that there is a spiritual dimension to being.

 

Sola gracia,

 

Arminius 

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi Arminius,   Arminius

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

The unitive grace I believe in is not given. It is already there,

 

So to be clear . . .unitive grace is not given it is a given.  It does not get to be described as a grace until we experience it as given?

 

Arminius wrote:

Those who do not experience grace miss out on the experience of universal unity.

 

Fair enough.  They miss out on the experience and yet, if universal unity is a given how do they miss out on that?

 

Arminius wrote:

They also miss out on the feelings that come with this experience, like unitive love, consciousness, and conscience. They further miss out on the impulse to enact those.

 

It follows that without certain experiences I would not have certain feelings.  I'm not sure that it follows that a lack of certain experiences renders one unconscious.  Though being unconcious would eliminate most impulses that are anything other than autonomic.

 

Arminius wrote:

Enacting those is, of course, contained in the Commandments. But after we are graced, we abide by them voluntarily or intuitively, following an inner impulse.

 

Also for clarity.  Experience of unitive love is a necessity for grace yet that same grace can be won by following the commandments because by following the commandments we generate the experience which is the grace?

 

If I am following your position it would appear that grace is self-generated.

 

Arminius wrote:

I also think that this state of grace is Jesus' "kingdom of heaven." Jesus eloquently expressed his grace with the statement "I and the Father are one."

 

This appears to support the notion that grace is self-generated.

 

Arminius wrote:

Why some people experience grace and others not is a mystery to me. It think we can come close to experiencing it in meditation. But not everyone who meditates experiences grace, and some who don't meditate do. I sometimes thought that belief in a separate God precludes an experience of unity with God, but some people who believed in a separate supernatural God did experience grace. Even some atheists experienced grace.

 

If grace is self-generated then the only requirement for any to experience grace would be the self.

 

Arminius wrote:

I sometimes entertain the notion that grace is sort of a postive psychosis, a rapturous high that releases a flood of endorphins which keep us in a postively charged emotional state. But then, from my experience as well as the anecdotal reports of others, grace persist even in a negative emotional state, even into death, and thus must be more than a mere emotionally positive psychosis.

 

This appears to throw the notion of grace as self-generated phenomenon into question.

 

Arminius wrote:

Well, I'm speculating. But my experience of grace has given me the absolute certainty that there is a spiritual dimension to being.

 

Most theology is speculation so that isn't really problematic.  I also do not have a problem with spiritual dimensions in general.

 

I am intrigued by your experience of grace and the certainty it has given you.  Were you in doubt about being having spiritual dimension?

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

Hi John:   Was I in doubt

Hi John:

 

Was I in doubt about "being" having a spiritual dimension to it?

 

Before the experience, yes. After the experience, never! In that I am an absolutist. But my certainty applies only to the experience itself.  As far as interpreting the experience goes, I am speculating.

 

Whether or not grace is self-generated is an interesting question. I think that separateness, or lack of grace, is an illusion created by the individual mind. Letting go of that illusion can result in an experience of grace

 

When we experience the creator-created unity, then this unity is a coming together of the two. The splitting of the two has been generated by the orginal One splitting itself into two, but the coming together of the two into original One is not really generated by either but is the awareness that the two are innately one. Grace, in my definition, simply is the awareness of what there is. The two are two, but also one. This seeming paradox is resolved in grace.

 

If oneness is the actual state of being, and separateness a man-made illusion, then all we have to do is let go of the illusion and the innate unity comes shining through. But it isn't that simple. The mere intellectual insight of or the belief in what I just said does not necessarily result in an experience of grace.

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

Hi again, John:   More

Hi again, John:

 

More answers to your questions.

 

Yes, I believe that unity is not given, it is a given. But most of us are not aware of this. Experiencing unity, and thereby becoming aware of it, is unitive grace.

 

And yes, unitive love is an inevitable outcome of the experience of unity. But if one practices unitive love as the foremost comandment, then this can also result in an experience of unitive grace. Thus, unitive love is or can be both the cause and the effect of an experience of unitive grace.

 

I think that the Triple Paradox—wereby diametric opposites are both separate and united, and the transcendental power or force, a.k.a. Holy Spirit, unites and separates the two—is the foremost spiritual and physical principle. In spirtuality it is known the Holy Trinity, in physical science as the Principle of Complementarity and Uncertainty. Even some aspects of Quantum Physics can be explained by the Triple Paradox.

 

Experiencing the Triple Paradox, experiencing that creator and created are one, but also two, and experiencing the transcendental power that unites and separates the two, is an experience of the foremost spiritual and physical principle, an experience of spiritual and intellectual enlightenment, and, of course, an experience of grace.

Back to Religion and Faith topics